Select Committee on Health Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence


APPENDIX 7

Memorandum by Cambridgeshire Health Authority (GD10)

  Please find attached a report to the Health Committee expressing our concerns about the shortage of supply and high cost of generic drugs.

  The implications for the NHS are significant. Of particular concern is the fact that overspend on GP prescribing expenditure arising as a result of the shortage of supply and rapid rise in prices, will have to be met through reductions in other budgetary expenditure, notably hospital and community services.

 AVAILABILITY OF GENERIC DRUGS TO THE NHS

  Health Committee Review on availability of generic drugs/Written evidence from five Primary Care Groups (PCGs) in Cambridgeshire Health Authority/1 November 1999

  This response is sent on behalf of the following organisations:

    South Cambridgeshire PCG

    Hungtingdon PCG

    Cambridge City PCG

    East Cambridgeshire PCG

    Fenland PCG

  PCGs are responsible for improving the health and health services for their local population. This includes the delivery of primary care services, including responsibility for managing prescribing expenditure in primary care; and the commissioning of hospital and community health services.

BACKGROUND

  1.1  The prices of generic drugs have soared in the past eight months. A leading generic producer (Regent GM) was forced to stop production in February and this has led to shortages of some products. Other suppliers have struggled to meet demand and the prices have, therefore, increased.

Table 3

ILLUSTRATES THE INCREASES IN GENERIC DRUGS
Table 3 1998 (based on 1 qtr cost) 1999 (based on 1 qtr cost)1998 cost per item 1999 cost per item% Increase
££ ££
Bendrofluazide (2.5mg)1,743 5,6660.280.58 107.14
Cimetidine (400mg)6,077 9,9695.919.44 59.73
Dihydrocodeine (30mg)5,204 8,8352.293.48 51.97
Frusemide (400mg)2,612 18,9940.532.46 364.15
Metronidazole (400mg)491 5230.921.01 9.78
Thyroxine (100mg)1,391 17,4550.212.05 876.19
Total17,608 61,44210.14 19.0287.57

  Source:  Prescription Pricing Authority (PPA).

  1.2  Supply and costs have also been affected by the new packaging (28 day blister packs) required by European regulations. This is predicted to cause an increase of three per cent in the PCG's drug spend.

  1.3  The increase in the numbers of Category D items, identified by the PPA, highlights the reduced availability of generic items. In March 1998, 30 items were listed, in January 1999, 50 items were listed, at the end of September the list has grown to 190 items.

 2.  IMPLICATIONS

  2.1  There are three main implications to the NHS because of these shortages:

    (a)  a significant cost implication to the NHS. The shortage of generic drugs has meant that pharmacists are having to dispense more expensive alternatives. In some cases a branded drug will be paid for by the NHS at many times the list price for the generic version.This represents a massive in year cost pressure for PCGs to manage, with little financial flexibility available, as the vast majority of Health Authority resources have already been committed to "commissioning" services from NHS trusts with no contingency reserves held. Points to note include:

      —  the NHS Confederation has established the cost pressure facing the average PCG because of generic problems as £250,000;

      —  local PCGs in southern Cambridgeshire are reporting forecast overspending on their GP prescribing budgets estimated by the PPA ranging from £301,000 to £544,000 (July 1999 data);

      —  the table above shows examples generic prescribing price increases in the last year. These range from an increase of + 10 per cent to + 876 per cent;

      —  PCG GP prescribing budgets have received their lowest increase for many years.

    (b)  reductions to hospital and community services to offset the overspend on prescribing. On 1 April 1999, prescribing expenditure became part of an integrated allocation for the provision of health services. An overspend on prescribing expenditure has to be offset by a corresponding reduction in expenditure elsewhere from within the integrated budget, the target part being hospital and community services. The current £2.21 million prescribing overspend across the five PCGs will have significant undesirable impact on our ability to maintain the existing range of services, and this is at a time when there are greater pressures than ever on delivering services to meet demand, and improve service quality. This has the potential to damage credibility of both PCGs and the Government;

    (c)  lack of availability of specific medicines can result in patients not receiving the medication considered most appropriate by their doctor. In most cases, the doctor will prescribe an alternative drug, but the patient, in this case, will not be receiving the best medication for their disease. Changing the prescription also wastes time both for the doctor, and the patient.

  2.2  Much work has been done to encourage practice to prescribe generically, a major focus of the Audit Commission's Value for Money recommendations, but this good practice is actually now costing the NHS more.

3.  RECOMMENDATION

  3.1  That the Health Committee:

    —  consider the implications of the shortage of supply and increase in cost of generic drugs;

    —  recommend actions in relation to the following:

      —  some form of price regulation should be introduced;

      —  the clawback of profits, by increasing the discount factor should be made permanent (approximately 2 per cent);

      —  "user" representation, notably PCGs, should be involved in discussions with the pharmaceutical industry or other appropriate forums;

      —  better communication from the centre advising of problems ahead. Very little hard information was received regarding Regent and generic production problems;

      —  more timely information from the PPA regarding GP prescribing spend, information is frequently received between two to three months in arrears;

      —  European regulations regarding packaging of drug products should be reviewed.



29 October 1999


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1999
Prepared 21 December 1999