Select Committee on Health Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence


APPENDIX 8

Letter from the Chief Pharmacist George Elliot Hospital NHS Trust to the Chairman of the Committee (GD 11)

  The Pharmaceutical Journal arrived over the weekend and I noticed that you were inviting evidence about Generic medicines. In view of the fact that the evidence has to be with you by 11 a.m. on 1 November, this is going to be a very brief note. If further details are needed I would be happy to help.

  I understand, empathise with and welcome your concern about the impact on the drug budgets of PCG's due to increases in prices of generic medicines. I am writing to alert you to the fact that similar impact has been occurring in the hospital sector, and the hospital pharmacists have been alerting the various committees for many months. However, it seems little notice has been taken of this. It certainly has not resulted in adjustments of the drug budgets to the hospital sector.

  I will illustrate with just two examples. The price of Digoxin 250 micrograms tablets has increased by nearly 500 per cent (pack of 28 now costs 42p whereas we used to buy a pack of 1,000 for £2.64). A pack of Thyroxine 28 tablets now costs us 33p whereas we used to buy 1,000 for £1.29. This represents an 800 per cent increase. Both the drugs are very commonly used, one for heart failure and the other for hormone replacement. Both these purchases have been made in the last few months so the prices quoted are recent examples. Both drugs have been purchased through our well established and excellent Central Division Contracts. So, even when we have the "muscle" for large volume purchase we are faced with these increases. One can imagine the Community Pharmacies are likely to be paying even more. Whilst it is understandable that the patient packs inevitably increases the costs in packaging it seems to me that this opportunity is being used to increase profit opportunities.

  The supplier of these drugs is a generic house and has been in operation for many years—long before Regent was closed down by MCA. Other generic suppliers have similarly increased their prices. I am sure you are also aware that some of the generic manufacturers have parent companies which actually control large sections of the market of branded products used by the NHS.

  A draft Health Circular Version 0.9 HSC1999/XXX landed on my desk on 19 October. It is concerning the Year 2000 problem and Medicine Supplies. This urges hospitals to ensure that patients do not need to see their GP's for repeat prescriptions between 20 December and 10 January. In essence the impact of this would be that we would have to issue patients with up to five weeks' supply of medicines. Our normal practice is to give patients either seven days or 14 days supply depending on the speciality. If we are required to follow this circular it will have major impact on stock holding and availability.

  To date, hospital pharmacists have had a gentlemen's understanding not to increase the stocks for Y2K. I know my colleagues in West Midlands have abided by this. However, I fear this circular may require us to re-examine our positions so as to ensure patients do not run out of their medicines.

  I would also urge you to bear in mind that hospital drug budgets are constantly under pressure from advances in new medicines for which funds do not generally follow. Hospital pharmacists have been recognised widely as making major contributions in rationalising medicines usage whilst at the same time ensuring best value for money for the NHS. We already have very serious difficulties in recruiting and retaining staff (largely due to poor salaries and conditions), the last thing we want is to divert our energies to what is essentially avoidable workload resulting from shortages in some very basic medicines.

  Should the NHS not have its own Manufacturer of Generics? We have proved it can be done with IV fluids in the past (Parkfields in Wolverhampton, until under the privatisation panacea of last government it was sold off).

  Please note the views expressed are my own and do not reflect our Trust's position.

1 November 1999


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1999
Prepared 21 December 1999