Select Committee on Health Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence


APPENDIX 2

Memorandum by HCSA (CC4)

  This paper is presented to the House of Commons Select Committee on Health as written evidence to its examination of NHS Consultant Contracts. It argues the case for the introduction of a "Work Sensitive Contract" to replace the current arrangements. The Hospital Consultants and Specialists Association would be pleased to offer oral evidence to the Committee.

CONSULTANTS' CONTRACTS

  Many of the problems that now arise over Consultant remuneration stem from a contract that has long since ceased to be a framework within which Consultants' work can be properly recognised.

  HCSA has consistently pursued the idea of a Work Sensitive Contract, centrally negotiated, and based upon the concept of the existing Notional Half Day priced annually by the Doctors' and Dentists' Review Body. The outline principles of a new contract are set out below:

Why the Need for Change

  Since 1955, when the entitlement to exercise the option of a whole-time or maximum part-time contract was introduced (except for those with limited commitments), contracts for Consultants have been fundamentally flawed and have created division and friction. The Reforms which introduced Trust Hospitals together with changing patterns of work have meant that the present contracts have become steadily less appropriate to the 1990s.

  The whole-time contract is neither fully closed nor fully defined. The January 1980 amendments, which followed the failure of the 1979 negotiations, were at best a fudge.

  This was seen by September 1980 when the Department said "Ministers would expect any definition to make absolutely clear that the duties of a whole-time post are not subject to an upper limit of time, and would not wish to see any wording which cast doubt on this point." And again, that an Authority "can expect as much from a consultant on a maximum part-time contract as on a whole-time contract" (despite the former being paid 1/11th less in salary).

  The HCSA proposals are sound and workable and do not conflict with new NHS legislation. The NHS would get value for money and Consultants get justly paid for the work they do. Such proposals would also give flexibility to enable local needs to be met within a National framework.

  A work-related contract in which the work is assessed in Notional Half Days (as defined in paragraph 61 of Terms and Conditions of Service) must surely be the most equitable arrangement that can be reached. With this in mind all HCSA pay claims and evidence to the Review Body since 1978 have been related to the value which should be placed on a Notional Half Day.

  The 1990 introduction of Job Plans and Work Programmes (HC(90)16) stipulated that most Consultants should work five to seven NHDs per week as Fixed Commitments and the remainder of their time flexibly.

The Work Related Contract

  A study of work-loads for different specialties, carried out by the HCSA, showed that the actual manner in which Consultants need to employ their time varies greatly. If the work-load and level of commitment is assessed in Notional Half Days, each of which is remunerated at the same rate for all specialties, then that same basic form of contract can apply to all. Any variations between individuals will exist as a result of the agreed content of each Job Plan and Work Programme.

  By this approach the contract will be work related, or work sensitive. Any work over and above the contractual commitment, medical audit included, should be regarded as additional and remunerated either by payment for additional NHDs or by a fee per item of service payment.

  Effectively, therefore, any new contract proposals will not contain any element of part-time or maximum part-time with the concomitant problems created by these differing contracts. The only differences will be created by the number of NHDs for which a Consultant accepts a contracted commitment to the NHS. In turn it follows that there will be no limitation on levels of private practice, but a Consultant cannot have a planned commitment for private practice that conflicts with an NHS Fixed Commitment; nor should a Consultant's overall commitment to private practice act to the detriment of his/her commitment to the NHS.

  Nor can any allowance for time travelling between private consulting rooms and NHS hospitals be included within the assessment of an NHD, but an allowance for travelling time between NHS hospitals may be included in the overall assessment of NHDs.

  The only specific concessions to cover private practice that must be built into all contracts is that necessary to cover the ethical responsibility of a Consultant to all patients whether NHS or private.

  A further element is that there will be flexibility of working within the Consultant Work Programme including the fixed NHDs—essential for many groups including those working in laboratories, pathology,x-ray, et cetera.

Notional Half Day

  The definition of a Notional Half Day must be established by modifying paragraph 61 of Terms and Conditions of Service to read as follows:

ASSESSMENT OF DUTIES

  For all Consultants the Trust shall make a general assessment, in terms of Notional Half Days and fractions thereof, of the average time per week required by an average practitioner in the grade and specialty to perform the duties of the post, a Notional Half Day being regarded as the equivalent of a period of three and a half hours.

  In making this assessment, the Trust shall take into account out-patient clinics, ward rounds, operating sessions, laboratory work, medical audit, administration including relevant committee work, on-call duties, emergency visits and so on in their hospitals. This shall include visits to other hospitals, GP Fundholders, for consultations, diagnosis or operative work, and time necessarily spent travelling to and from them. The Authority shall also include time given, eg, as Consultant Adviser to the Trust on special branches of the service or by way of "pastoral visits" to outlying hospitals. Not included in the computation are elements of time for the care of private patients under Section 65(2) of the National Health Service Act 1977. There shall also be excluded time required for domiciliary consultations (for which special fees are payable) and any additional time contracted for, and remunerated separately.

The Standard Contract

  1.  At the outset each Consultant will agree with the employing authority a Job Plan and Work Programme covering the clinical duties assessed in NHDs.

  2.  The standard contract will consist of 10 NHDs per week which will be remunerated by the full agreed basic salary.

  3.  By agreement a Consultant may contract to undertake more or less than 10 NHDs. Contracts of less than 10 NHDs will be of advantage to those with special family commitments; the handicapped, those with split contracts, and those who have high levels of private practice either within or outside the NHS hospitals.

  4.  Each Consultant will have allocated as part of the contracted commitment and included within the total number of NHDs appropriate to the standard week, two NHDs allocated as follows:

    (a)  One NHD in recognition of the basic on-call commitment which derives from Consultants' continuing clinical responsibility for the care of patients in their charge, or for the continuing responsibility for their department in the case of non-clinical Consultants.

    (b)  One NHD in recognition of the administrative duties associated with the post.

  For those holding contracts for less than the standard week the allocations (a) and (b) above will be applied pro rata.

  5.  On-call duty which is additional to the basic commitment of continuing responsibility and is obligatory will be allocated as NHDs related to the frequency, degree of availability and level of supporting staff.

  6.  Emergency re-call which is obligatory will be allocated as NHDs averaged over a period and built in to the overall assessment.

Additional Work

  All work over and above the standard or basic week undertaken by mutual agreement is to be regarded as additional and will be remunerated by the allocation of additional NHDs or item of service payments, eg:

    By NHD

      (a)  Deputising for absent colleagues

      (b)  Formal Teaching and Training

      (c)  Research

    By Item of Service

      (a)  Domiciliary Consultations

      (b)  Exceptional Consultations

      (c)  Family Planning

  Additional duties, whether managerial or clinical, shall be remunerated by NHD allocation or by item of service payments as appropriate to the department.

REVIEW MECHANISM

  To be established to agree the assessment of duties and allocation of NHDs on a regular annual basis.

SUPERANNUATION

  All NHD payments above 10 must carry the option of being superannuable.

  The HCSA believes that a contract based upon these principles will give the rewards and flexibility that the massive changes in staffing structures heralded by the introduction of the reduction in Junior Doctors' Hours and Calmanised Training will inevitably bring. There will undoubtedly be severe staff shortages until the necessary projected increase in Consultant numbers takes place and by rewarding the Consultants in post for the additional work that they will inevitably be called upon to undertake, will go some way to lessen the general feeling of lack of appreciation now so widely held by the Consultant Body.

  In particular it will be essential to provide a proper recognised framework within which the increasing number of women doctors, with their special needs, can be accommodated. Job sharing and part-time working will need to be integrated fully into the staffing system if the NHS is not to lose a large proportion of specialist trained doctors because of the difficulties endured in the competing demands of family and NHS.

  The present ad hoc arrangements to which the 26th Review Body refers, that of granting additional Notional Half Days, presents too much of a hostage to fortune as Trusts increasingly claim that they are unable to pay and therefore place an unacceptable moral blackmail upon the professionalism of Consultants who as a matter of course put the interests of their patients first.

June 2000


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 13 July 2000