Select Committee on Health Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence


APPENDIX 9

Memorandum by the NHS Executive, Department of Health (CC1A)

TEMPORARY ADDITIONAL NOTIONAL HALF DAYS (TANHD'S)

  1.  Employers can also contact with consultants for up to two, or exceptionally three, TANHD's to recognise work undertaken outside their normal contractual duties. These extra NHD's are paid at one eleventh of the whole-time salary.

  2.  Information collected in 1998 suggested that 5,700 consultants in England (or 27 per cent) were receiving one or more TANHD's, most commonly to recognise extra clinical duties, onerous on-call commitments and heavy non-clinical workload, particularly management responsibilities. Some 70 per cent of clinical directors and almost 80 per cent of medical directors received TANHD's in respect of the additional responsibilities on these activities, whereas 15 per cent of other consultants received TANHD's in respect of activities other than clinical or medical directors. The annual cost is around £50 million.

CONSULTANTS' DISCRETIONARY POINTS

  3.  Discretionary Points (DP) are consolidated payments in addition to the maximum of the consultant's salary scale, paid at the discretion of employers. The DP scheme was introduced in 1996. Until 1 April 2000, the DP scale consisted of five points of equal value. However, there are now eight points available, worth about £2,500 each. These are uprated from time to time in light of recommendations of the Review Body on Doctors' and Dentists' Remuneration (DDRB).

  4.  Discretionary Points are not seniority payments, nor automatic annual increments. To warrant award, consultants are expected to demonstrate above average contributions in respect of one or more of service to patients, teaching, research, and management and development of the service. Progression up the DP scale reflects the continuing quality and range of the contribution made by consultants. To attain the maximum of the scale they will be expected to have demonstrated an outstanding contribution to services.

  5.  The criteria for payment of DP were also changed from 1 April 2000, to allow greater recognition of service achievement (highlighted in italics below). The criteria allow for contributions made in the following areas to be taken into account:

    (i)  professional excellence, including;

      —  quality of clinical care of patients;

      —  sevice development;

      —  professional leadership;

      —  improvements in public health;

    (ii)  significant contribution towards the achievement of local NHS service priorities;

    (iii)  undertaking recognised significant heavy workload or responsibilities in pursuit of local NHS service goals;

    (iv)  contribution to professional and multidisciplinary teamworking;

    (v)  research, innovation and improvement in the service;

    (vi)  clinical audit;

    (vii)  administrative or NHS management contributions;

    (viii)  teaching and training, including;

      —  training of junior staff;

      —  involvement in undergraduate or postgraduate teaching;

      —  public education and health problems;

      —  contribution to training of other staff;

    (ix)  Wider contribution to the work of the NHS nationally.

  6.  Consultants must have reached the maximum of their basic salary scale to be eligible for consideration for a DP. Consultants who have been awarded a Distinction Award are not eligible.

  7.  NHS and Health Authorities are required to award each year 0.35 new points for each eligible consultant. About 34 per cent of Consultants (about 7,500) in England in 1999 were in receipt of one or more DP, at an annual cost of around £60 million.

MAXIMUM PART-TIME CONTRACTS

  8.  There were 22,020 hospital medical consultants in England as at 30 September 1999, according to the NHS Executive's annual census of Trusts and Health Authorities, 25 per cent of these were on maximum part-time contracts, as shawn in the following table (which also shows a breakdown by speciality group).

HOSPITAL MEDICAL CONSULTANTS BY TYPE OF CONTRACT AND SPECIALTY GROUP

England: 30 September 1999


percentage
All
Whole time
Max Part-Time
Part-Time
Honorary

All Specialties
100
58
25
11
5
Accident & emergency
100
88
7
5
0
Anaesthetics
100
56
35
8
2
Clinical oncology
100
57
25
12
7
General medicine
100
58
20
12
10
Obs & Gynae
100
42
42
10
6
Paediatric group
100
78
4
12
8
Pathology group
100
84
14
10
12
Psychiatry group
100
73
4
17
6
Radiology group
100
46
37
14
2
Surgical group
100
46
43
8
3


  Source: NHS Executive medical and dental workforce census

  9. Within the surgical group, there are variations in the percentage of maximum part-time contract holders by individual specialty, as shown below.

HOSPITAL MEDICAL CONSULTANTS IN THE SURGICAL GROUP: BY TYPE OF CONTRACT AND SPECIALTY

England: 30 September 1999


percentage
All
Whole time
Max Part-Time
Part-Time
Honorary

Surgical Group
100
46
43
8
3
Cardio-thoracic surgery
100
51
36
9
3
General surgery
100
47
43
6
4
Neurosurgery
100
63
29
4
4
Ophthalmology
100
42
40
15
3
Otolaryngology
100
38
49
10
3
Paediatric surgery
100
77
9
8
6
Plastic surgery
100
46
39
14
1
Trauma + Orthop
100
45
45
7
2
Urology
100
46
45
7
2


  Source: NHS Executive medical and dental workforce census

DATA ON NHS AND PRIVATE PATIENTS

  10.  The Health Select Committee asked whether any exercise had been undertaken in respect of evaluating the operating lists, the use of individual theatres used for NHS and private patients and the clinical needs of those patients; and whether the NHS shared data with the private sector.

  11.  The Committee may wish to refer to the study by Professor Brian Williams, published in Volume 29, No 1 of the 1997 edition of Health Trends: Utilisation of NHS hospital beds in England by private patients. This used Hospital Episode Statistics data from 1989-90 to 1994-95 to compare NHS patients treated in NHS hospitals with private patients treated in NHS hospitals.

  12.  We do not at present share data with the private sector. We know that the private sector have detailed information on the treatment of patients, but this is sensitive information and is not published. We will be exploring, as part of the concordat development, the opportunities for sharing information between the NHS and the private sector, both at local and national level. However, we are only at the early stages of this work and we will need to pay particular attention to confidentiality issues.

June 2000


 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 13 July 2000