Select Committee on International Development Minutes of Evidence



Examination of witnesses (Questions 100 - 109)

TUESDAY 14 MARCH 2000

THE RT HON CLARE SHORT, MR BARRIE IRETON and MR ROB HOLDEN

  100. What is bothering about it as well is that it is simply announced as cash, and my bet would be that very, very little money in fact has been expended, through ECHO, on the emergency. So not only were we slow in reacting with funds, it then will only come through when the emergency has passed. Is that correct?
  (Clare Short) That is the problem in the whole international system. You get people announcing money on television, right through the international system, that does not get on to the ground, sometimes, until a year later. They say "What is X country doing?" They say "Big song".

Chairman

  101. Can we jump on, because we will need to get you to your meeting, Secretary of State. Could you write about what exactly ECHO did and, also, tell us what the United States contributed?[4] I know they were having a conference in Washington at the time on Africa, but I do not think they have contributed anything, and they have got Diego Garcia not very far away.
  (Clare Short) They have got quite a lot of troops there now, have they not?

  Chairman: I want to move quickly, Mr Robathan, to regional responses and then to debt.

Mr Robathan

  102. We have already covered the question of helicopters actually within Mozambique, but there have been a lot of problems with visas there, I understand, for emergency personnel and civilian personnel.
  (Clare Short) That is part of the problem that Barrie Ireton referred to, of a very bureaucratic system that cannot even move in an emergency. So there are people coming in to help with the emergency being held up with visas.

  103. The overriding question is, really, if there is anything that can be done either by Britain or the international community to assist developing countries respond to crises like this, and that is a particular example—and another example is the aircraft that flew into South Africa and was told it could not stop and had to move on; whether there is anything the international community can do to foster regional co-ordination prior to the crisis and, particularly, thinking about water control in the Cahora Bassa, or wherever it might be. In particular—and this is a specific instance—what do you think of the regional response to the emergency? We have heard what you think about South Africa. Zimbabwe, of course, has a lot of helicopters and most of them are fighting a rather unpleasant war in the Congo. Is there anything else that could have been done regionally?
  (Clare Short) I think the first part of your question I fully take, and I have already answered that. We need to strengthen the international system, its regional capacity and in-country, especially in countries subject to these disasters. We have been working on it, it needs a push and it needs more urgency. On the general water in the region, we have this conference coming up in The Hague very shortly about water and sanitation for people that are lacking either. We need better management of water both to deliver it to people but also for its use for agricultural and to prevent wars, and so on. We need to think much, much more strategically about water and the interface with the environment, and we do hope to push that forward. In terms of Zimbabwe, you are right, they were affected by the crisis and they have their own flooding. I do not know how many helicopters they have but they are engaged elsewhere, and they have got an awful lot of problems themselves.

  Chairman: I think we will have to leave it there, Secretary of State, if you are to keep your appointment.

  Mr Grant: Clare, you wanted suggestions, not only negative criticisms. Can I suggest that you develop a system where you divide up the world into spheres of influence and have individual countries responsible if there is a disaster in that area? Those countries can then liaise with the United Nations as well as other countries in order to get the effort sorted out. If it is left to the United Nations I doubt very much whether we will be here in five years' time.

Chairman

  104. Not exactly a short question.
  (Clare Short) I understand the frustration that goes into the system, but the UN is the only UN we have got and it is a completely precious instrument. It is the only thing that can do, with real moral authority and respected by the governments concerned, this co-ordinating job, and we have to strengthen the capacity of the governments that are subject to these disasters to cope themselves. So I understand, you are almost saying that because all that does not work why do we not get different donors to take responsibility. Mozambique, for example, has a very proud Government—quite right too—and early on very much wanted to be in control of events, and then got a little bit outpaced by the scale of the emergency. So one has to be respectful—and you are the last person I have to tell this to. So the real test is to get the UN working, get regional systems and get governments more prepared to cope with disasters.

  105. Secretary of State, I was going to ask you about the debt question but I think, if I may, I will simply write to you and ask if you would write a note.
  (Clare Short) I would be happy to provide you with a full note.[5] This is very important for the reconstruction phase, but not of course for this phase. As a matter of fact, at the moment Mozambique has quite a lot of reserves and we need to make sure they are properly deployed. Barrie Ireton is working on this in the reconstruction phase. So debt really matters to the development of Mozambique but not to getting people off trees and then getting them fed and preventing the spread of disease.

  106. Would Mr Ireton include the financial perspective that you describe in dealing with the debt issue? We would be very grateful.
  (Clare Short) Insofar as we can, because they are not our reserves, but we will tell you all we know about them.

  107. What the financial situation is, because there is, of course, total debt forgiveness in Mozambique.
  (Clare Short) You know the UK has done that and Gordon Brown has been working to get everyone to have a moratorium, which happened in the case of Central America. So as well as the debt relief coming there should be a moratorium about any payments while that is sorted out, as the UK has done. Gordon is working hard to try to get agreement on that.
  (Mr Ireton) There is a meeting at the Paris Club on Wednesday and Thursday of this week, in which we will be proposing that everybody agrees a moratorium on the bilateral issue there.

  108. I know there are other pressing duties, but if you could get us a letter by the end of the week.[6]
  (Clare Short) We will indeed. It is here, we can get it to you.

  109. Thank you very much for coming, Secretary of State. You have clarified a whole raft of questions for us and enabled us, and I think the public in general, to see that you have been working extremely hard and effectively to try and rescue people from the desperate situation they are in in Mozambique. Thank you, all three of you, for coming this morning and spending your time telling us what you are doing.
  (Clare Short) Thanks a lot.


4   See Evidence Ibid. Back

5   See Evidence pp. 21-2. Back

6   See Evidence pp. 21-2. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 3 May 2000