Select Committee on International Development Sixth Special Report



APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO THE FIRST REPORT OF THE INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE: "THE EXPORT CREDITS GUARANTEE DEPARTMENT—DEVELOPMENTAL ISSUES"

I have pleasure in attaching the Government's response to the conclusions and recommendations contained in the Committee's First Report on "The Export Credits Guarantee Department—Developmental Issues", published on 17 December 1999.

The Report enclosed a number of submissions from NGOs about ECGD's policies on environmental and developmental issues and we were able to take these into account in carrying out the Review of ECGD's Mission and Status.

I am enclosing copies of the Mission & Status Review Report on which Stephen Byers made an announcement earlier today.

I would of course welcome any further observations that the Committee may wish to make.

Rt Hon Richard Caborn MP, Minister for Trade

25 July 2000



INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT

"THE EXPORT CREDITS GUARANTEE DEPARTMENT—DEVELOPMENTAL ISSUES"—REPORT PUBLISHED 17 DECEMBER 1999

ECGD RESPONSE TO THE CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED IN THE REPORT

1.  We intend to return to these issues in the New Year and hope that further consultation will take place before the finalisation of the Review. We do, of course, expect developmental concerns to be seriously addressed during the course of the Review and discussed fully in the report of the Review's findings (paragraph 5).

The Review of ECGD's Mission and Status has taken full account (as required by its terms of reference) of the relationship between ECGD's activities and the Government's wider objectives, including in relation to sustainable development. The Secretary of State for Trade and Industry also made it clear when he announced the Review, in July 1999, that he wanted it to consider how ECGD could help developing countries to emerge from debt and poverty burdens and return to the international trading community.

Chapter 5 of the Review report looks at ECGD support for developing countries and the question of debt sustainability and Chapter 6 looks at what else ECGD will do to ensure its support for projects is consistent with the Government's sustainable development and foreign policy objectives.

2.  We recommend that the Review propose an inclusion of the Government's developmental objectives in ECGD's revised Mission Statement. We will examine with interest the specific wording proposed by the Review (paragraph 8).

ECGD's new Mission will be "To benefit the UK economy by helping exporters of UK goods and services win business and UK firms to invest overseas, by providing guarantees, insurance and reinsurance against loss taking into account the Government's international policies." ECGD will also have an objective "to ensure its activities accord with other Government objectives, including those on sustainable development, human rights, good governance and trade."

3.  We recommend that the Review investigate the claim that the high proportion of cover provided by ECGD for defence equipment is at the expense of non-defence related exports (paragraph 19).

There is no evidence of ECGD support for defence business crowding out civil contracts. ECGD's primary remit is to facilitate the export of capital goods from the UK without discriminating between industrial sectors. ECGD's support is given to exporters on a first come (with firm business), first served basis and so defence-related exports have as much right to ECGD support as do civil exports.

The same underwriting criteria and premium rates apply to civil and defence business although defence business usually attracts more restrictive payment terms.

4.  We consider the protection of DFID's budget, mentioned in the Oxfam recommendation, to be an important principle in this debate on the forgiveness of ECGD debt. Any write-off should be borne by the Treasury and should have no implications for the future funding of DFID. We also believe that it is important to link debt forgiveness to poverty reduction strategies (paragraph 21).

The Treasury and DFID will agree the budget necessary to ensure the full financing of this commitment, in the context of DFID's budget and reflecting the need to ensure that funding is not diverted from other development needs.

All countries requesting assistance under the HIPC Initiative must adopt and implement a poverty reduction strategy developed through a broad-based participatory process.

5.  We expect ECGD to review current research and if necessary commission new research into the impact of ECGD, and of export credit agencies more generally, on developing economies (paragraph 25).

Chapter 5 of the Review report looks to the future and addresses the issue of how ECGD can do more to help developing countries. ECGD is also to hold a joint seminar with DFID, in September 2000, to look at how ECAs in general can help developing countries to reduce poverty and how ECGD can take forward the implementation of the ECGD Review's conclusions. Members of the Committee will be invited to attend this seminar.

6.  We recommend that the Review place its policy proposals within a strategy for the internationally agreed reform of export credit agencies, and that this strategy have as a priority the elimination of poverty in developing countries (paragraph 26).

The Review has examined ECGD's aims and objectives to ensure that its support is consistent with wider Government objectives for sustainable development. ECGD will press for international acceptance of its productive expenditure policy and will keep open the option of applying this to other countries.

As well as developing a set of Business Principles, ECGD will publish information for customers and others on its screening and assessment procedures. ECGD will press strongly for standards of project assessment to be raised multilaterally and for the adoption of sustainable development principles and policies by ECAs.


 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 7 August 2000