Select Committee on Science and Technology Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence


Annex 1

  

MRC LEUKAEMIA TRIALS: ACHIEVEMENTS TO DATE

1.1  The treatment of acute leukaemia in the UK, for both adults and children, has benefited greatly from the structured organisation and networking within national trials over the last 30 years. These trials have been supported by the Medical Research Council and have led to substantial improvement in survival rates (figures 1, 2, 3). They are now recognised as amongst the most influential trials worldwide and their success has led to participation and collaboration by other respected national groups. In the UK, recruitment has steadily increased with over 90 per cent of children now treated on MRC Leukaemia Trials. Such recruitment, for both adult and childhood leukaemia, has allowed these trials to be amongst the largest in the world facilitating a series of important questions about leukaemia treatment to be addressed in a logical and sequential manner over the years.

  1.2  National trials with their proven ability to recruit large number of patients have not only shown themselves capable of evaluating new treatment regimes, but have also provided a very large clinical database extending back over 30 years. This database is an unequalled resource for evidence based treatment which is now crucial with the establishment of the National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Past trials have identified new treatments which have led to an improvement in survival but as importantly have shown some expensive new drugs or treatment modalities to be of no benefit. It is of importance to note that continued improvement in outcome and evaluation of treatment modalities have taken place in over 200 district hospitals in the UK as well as in teaching centres showing the benefit of maintaining structured and successful networking.

  1.3  The Leukaemia Research Fund has been an important partner in the success of leukaemia treatment by funding Clinical Training Fellowships and grants to support associated scientific projects and more recently by sponsoring smaller development trials to test new treatment options before more extensive trial evaluation. In addition, the LRF supported Acute Leukaemia Cytogenetic Database at the Royal Free School of Medicine, London provides an important resource for peer review of cytogenetic data and correlation of findings with outcome.

CURRENT CONCERNS

  21  The present structure, which allows effective networking and has led to the success of leukaemia treatment, is now under significant threat because of insufficient finance within the MRC to allow continued support of highly rated, peer-reviewed trial proposals as has happened in the past.

  2.2  There are major implications of not sustaining the present network. Firstly, in the absence of supported clinical trials recruitment would fall off. Secondly, there is the risk of expensive new approaches being introduced in an ad hoc manner without proper evaluation by trial. Thirdly, the improvement in outcome may not be sustained. It must be obvious that the present network is one of the principal reasons for the improvement in outcome seen over the last 20 years, is essential to future progress, is an asset to the National Health Service and represents a model for clinical research of cancer.

  2.3  It is essential, as a matter of urgency, to find a way of maintaining the present successful system which may involve a partnership of resourcing between the NHS, the MRC, and Medical Charities; principally the LRF for leukaemia treatment.

Professor Alan Burnett

Chair MRC Adult Leukaemia

Working PartyDr Brenda Gibson

Chair MRC Paediatric Leukaemia

Working Party







LRF CLINICAL TRIALS ADVISORY PANEL

  TERMS OF REFERENCE

(i)  to promote the highest quality of clinical research within the context of clinical trials

  (ii)  to promote phase II/small phase III trials of new chemotherapy and biological entities as a precursor to definitive phase III trials

  (iii)  to peer review applications for the funding of trials from established expert trial groups

  (iv)  to identify new opportunities for trial support

  (v)  to recommend funding options to the LRF Executive Committee

  (vi)  to liaise with the NHS, the MRC and other funding agencies and with international trial groups

  (vii)  to ensure trials, data collection and analysis are conducted on the basis of GCP guidelines

  (viii)  to monitor the progress of trials by annual reports and, if appropriate, audit

  (ix)  to liaise with the LRF Medical & Scientific Advisory Panel for the inclusion of research projects as integral components of trials whenever possible

  (x)  to ensure the publication and dissemination of trial outcomes within an agreed time frame

  (xi)  to promote regular review meetings and, when appropriate, workshops etc. to disseminate information to trialists

  (xii)  to support the LRF website for trial organisers and patient advocacy groups.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 28 July 2000