Select Committee on Science and Technology Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence


Annex 1

Case Study

THE DETECTION AND TREATMENT OF PROSTATE CANCER

1.  Prostate cancer is the second most prevalent form of cancer in men. Around one in 12 men in the UK will develop the disease which, like many cancers, will have high survival rates if the disease is detected and treated at an early stage. Regrettably, in the UK, detection is often not until the later stages and, accordingly, some 10,000 deaths per annum are attributed to prostate cancer.

  2.  In countries such as the USA and Canada, where there is more emphasis upon the early detection of prostate cancer, the morbidity rate is proportionately substantially less. Both countries have more prevalent screening for the cancer which is by means of regular testing of the at risk population. A relatively simple blood test is conducted which, over a period of time, monitors the amount of Prostate Specific Antigen in the blood. Growing levels of PSA are a good indication of the onset of prostate cancer and when detected, urologists can conduct further examinations to determine the presence and extent of cancer and take appropriate action. This is usually in the earlier stage of the disease's development when treatment success rates can be as high as 85 per cent of patients surviving disease free for at least ten years.

  3.  There are a number of treatment options available for the cancer. The current "gold standard" is radical prostectomy—the surgical removal of the gland. Radiation treatment by external beam therapy is also common. Both techniques carry the risk of undesirable side effects—incontinence, impotence and discomfort for the patient which clearly lowers the patient's quality of life and costs healthcare providers more money to treat over a prolonged period. Both options also involve extensive time in hospital either for surgery, taking up bed space, or with repeated visits to radiology departments over several weeks for external beam therapy.

  4.  A further option is that of brachytherapy. This involves the implant of radioactivity directly into the prostate gland which irradiates the cancer from within. This technique has several advantages over other methods, notably it has much less incidence of side-effects and can be performed with only a one night hospital stay or even on an out-patient basis as the technique does not involve surgery. Instead, 80 to 100 tiny seeds of radioactive material are placed, under local anaesthetic, into the gland using a needle-like device. Once implanted into the prostate the radioactivity, which is tailored precisely to the amount required to treat the individual patient's cancer, irradiates the cancer from within over a period of months. The seeds are not removed from the patient and they cause no problem to him.

  5.  Nycomed Amersham has been amongst the pioneers of providing this technique across the globe. Around 30 per cent of all prostate cancers in the USA are now treated by brachytherapy and of the 40,000 OncoSeedsTM produced each week by the company in the UK, around 90 per cent are destined for patients in North America. In the UK, only about 400 patients in total have been treated with OncoSeedsTM in the past two years and the technique is still not readily available.

  6.  With its inherent advantages over surgery, it is right to query why so few patients have been treated with brachytherapy in the UK. The first problem has been that the technique is relatively new and requires considerable skill and training for urologists or radiologists to conduct implants. Nycomed Amersham has been helping to achieve this by inviting USA experts to Europe to demonstrate the technique and train clinicians at key centres in the UK. There are now about a dozen centres in the UK which can offer brachytherapy and the next challenge is to increase GPs awareness of the technique as a treatment option. This is now occurring faster as patients become more aware of the technique through prostate cancer charities and support groups which promote their work using the internet.

  7.  The second important problem to overcome is the poor record of early detection of prostate cancers in the UK. By the time it is diagnosed, for many men the disease has progressed beyond successful treatment by any method. This simply is a preventable waste of life as routine PSA testing could identify many cancers before they reach a life threatening stage. In the UK, only 35 to 40 per cent of prostate cancers are detected at an early stage, compared to 65 to 70 per cent in the USA. Trials in Canada showed that screening resulted in a five fold reduction in deaths from prostate cancer and that close to 100 per cent of cancers diagnosed at an early stage were curable.

  8.  We would urge the Government to consider the full benefits in terms of avoided treatment costs and increased life expectancy from diagnosing prostate cancer earlier and treating it using proven techniques, including brachytherapy. In the same way, that the cost benefits of providing mass routing screening for cervical cancer have been shown, the same case could be made for PSA testing for prostate cancer.

  9.  Finally, as new technology emerges, it is likely that within a few years there will be a genetic screening test available for the predisposition of prostate cancer. This will provide the ability to either treat the patient with new genetically based drugs which could alter the relevant protein structure which causes the cancer, or at least alert the patient to be regularly screened in later life using conventional methods to determine when the disease begins to take effect and at which point treatment could be administered with excellent prospects of success.

  10.  Nycomed Amersham would be pleased to provide further information on its OncoSeedsTM radiopharmaceuticals and RAPIDStrandTM delivery system for the Seeds to the Committee.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 28 July 2000