Select Committee on Science and Technology Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence


APPENDIX 38

Memorandum submitted by Professor Emeritus James Spencer Malpas, University of London

  INTRODUCTION

1.  During my career as a medical oncologist I served on numerous committees concerned with cancer research and the provision of services for the care of patients with cancer in adults and children. Among the most frustrating were those concerned with medical or scientific manpower. The present shortage of cancer clinicians and academics was entirely predictable. I hope in this short memorandum to suggest how this could be remedied as this shortage is the single most important factor affecting cancer research at this time.

  2.  It is undeniable that there is presently a shortage of medically trained academics with 20 per cent of established chairs vacant. Careers in academic medicine are perceived as unattractive because of the shortfall in earnings at every stage. It is no help for doyens of the profession to say that the work is sufficient reward—it does not pay the mortgage. A second factor is the removal of tenure which has affected the security of many senior academic positions and which compares unfavourably with that enjoyed by colleagues in whole time clinical practice.

  3.  There is going to be a shortage of doctors in the United Kingdom for at least the next 10 years. The key to improving research on cancer and its treatment is to attract the best trainees in sufficiently large numbers to provide a critical mass of expertise.

  4.  This can be achieved by:

    1.  Making financial earnings compatible at each stage of an academic career with their non-academic counterpart.

    2.  The introduction of a tenure track system in which suitable young physicians are given an appropriate length of scientific training leading, if everything is satisfactory, to a tenured post. The duration of this tenured position is arguable but for someone in their early 30s it should not be less than 15 years thereby covering the most productive period of their careers.

    3.  The introduction of a distinction award system for medical scientists. There has been some criticism of the distinction award system but as Churchill said of democratic government it's the worst form except for all the others!

    4.  Encouraging young post-doctorates, either from a clinical or scientific background to join research teams in Universities or Hospitals. It is important to avoid the temptation of setting up a monolithic cancer institute. These institutes only serve to denude other good centres of expertise and result in an unacceptable concentration of cancer patients. The United Kingdom has an insufficient reserve of cancer orientated medical manpower to enable this to work.

SUMMARY

  The attraction of the best medical and scientific personnel into cancer research is impeded by lack of financial reward and security. This is the fundamental cause of the unsatisfactory state of affairs in this country. All other considerations are of secondary importance.

  A proposal is made to address this problem and to avoid damaging existing centres.

March 2000


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 28 July 2000