Select Committee on Science and Technology Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence


APPENDIX 58

Supplementary memorandum submitted by Professor Emeritus James Spencer Malpas, University of London Letter to the Clerk of the Committee

  Thank you for your letter of the 3 April and for the subsequent "Press Notice" of the 19 May. After our telephone conversation, I thought rather than applying to give oral evidence before the Select Committee, I would support my written evidence[32] with two relevant references.


  The first is:

    Reviving Academic Medicine in Britain.

    Sandra Goldbech-Wood in the British Medical Journal volume 320, p 591.

  Two quotations are relevant; "Without high quality research there can be no high quality evidence on which to base effective health care" and "Pay and conditions (of academics) have not kept up with the NHS, and an academic may end up £22,000 worse off after five years than a clinical colleague".

  The second is an in depth review of the problem of academic careers as given in:

    College of Vice Chancellors and Principles. Clinical Academic Careers. Report of an independent task force. London. CVCP. 1997.

31 May 2000


32   See Appendix 38. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2000
Prepared 28 July 2000