Annex H
ILLUSTRATIVE STATEMENT OF EXCESSES UNDER
RAB
This Annex contains an illustration of a resource-based
Statement of Excesses under RAB. It includes, for illustrative
purposes, a number of fictitious examples based on the following
scenarios:
— Department A exceeds its current
provision in RfR2, partly offset by excess resource Appropriations
in Aid (AinA).
— Department B exceeds its administrative
costs limit within RfR1, partly offset by an underspend on non-administration
costs, the remainder offset by excess AinA, leaving a token £1,000
to be voted.
— Department C incurs a shortfall
in current AinA in RfR3, partly offset by underspending on other
current subheads.
— Department D has a shortfall
in non-operating AinA partly offset by underspending on capital,
leading to an overall overspend on its net cash requirement.
— Department E incurs an excess
on its net cash requirement with no resource implications.
— Department F exceeds its current
provision on RfR1, partly offset by excess resource AinA. There
is a additional unrelated excess on the department's net cash
requirement.
2. The reasons for the excesses are explained
more fully in the illustrative Explanations in Part III of the
Statement.
3. It is important to note that it has been
assumed in some of the examples, for the sake of simplicity, that
the cash implications of the excess are identical to the resource
implications, but that will not always be the case.
2001-02: STATEMENT OF EXCESSES
PART I
|
| Total net resource requirement | £2,751,000\20
|
| Total cash net requirement | £3,251,001\00
|
|
|
