Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
Mr. Fitzpatrick: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what progress has been made in reforming the arrangements for industrial relations in prisons and in setting up a Prison Service Pay Review Body for England, Wales and Northern Ireland. [150088]
Mr. Straw: On 26 July 2000, Official Report, column 713W, my right hon. Friend the Minister of State, Home Office, announced that it was my intention to set up a pay review body to make independent recommendations to the Government on the pay of prison governors, prison officers and related grades for the Prison Service in England and Wales and for the Northern Ireland Prison Service.
I indicated that the delivery of those intentions depended on my being satisfied that the state of industrial relations within prisons is such to enable the effective and efficient management of the service. At that time, relations were not satisfactory because the Prison Officers Association (POA) had withdrawn goodwill following a decision to market test Her Majesty's Prison, Brixton.
Since then, there has been a very frank but positive dialogue between the Prison Service, the POA and Ministers on this and a range of other issues. I am pleased to announce today that I am satisfied that the industrial relations climate is now conducive to proceeding with plans for a pay review body.
I am also able to announce the appointment of Sir Toby Frere to the post of chair of the Prison Service Pay Review Body.
This review body will operate on the lines of the five existing review bodies which deal with 1.3 million public sector employees. Like the existing review bodies, it will have a secretariat from the independent Office of Manpower Economics. The remit of the Pay Review Body will also have the scope to make an independent determination in relation to the pay of prison governors, prison officers, night patrol officers and prison auxiliaries in the Northern Ireland Prison Service based on submissions made to it by that service.
This establishment of an independent pay determination mechanism is under the provisions of section 128 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994. It is part of a comprehensive improvement in Prison Service management.
It is also my intention, when parliamentary time allows, to replace section 127 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 with a reserve statutory power and a voluntary industrial relations agreement. Section 127, as it stands, makes it unlawful for officers of a prison to take industrial action. The voluntary agreement which has been
9 Feb 2001 : Column: 748W
accepted by the Prison Governors Association (PGA) and the POA national executive committee will be put to a special POA delegates conference at the end of February. This will mean that they have agreed not to induce, support or authorise industrial action. In recognition of this we will provide them with a new disputes procedure which will include independent arbitration. The voluntary agreement, which will be legally binding, will give me, as Secretary of State for the Home Department, the power to seek injunctive relief.
In order to bring about these important improvements in industrial relations in the Prison Service in England and Wales quickly, I intend to use the provisions of the voluntary agreement instead of those in section 127, while awaiting parliamentary time to effect the changes in legislation. However, it is clear on all sides that section 127 would be used in the event of a breakdown of the agreement.
Together, these measures create a new climate for industrial relations in the service. They clear the way for more constructive dialogue on a wide range of issues by modernising the way that this key group of public sector workers deal with their employer.
Mr. Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will make a statement on his policy towards monitoring the European Commission's spending on its budget lines, with particular reference to moneys spent on (a) information campaigning and (b) lobby groups. [147516]
Mr. Vaz: The Council and Parliament are the joint arms of the EU Budgetary Authority and have responsibility in monitoring and setting annual spending for all EC institutions, including the Commission. Within this arrangement, it is the Parliament which has the final say (in its Second Reading of the Budget) over all items of non-compulsory expenditure, which includes funding for information campaigns and lobby groups. With regards to these, it is within the remit of the Commission to make commitments and payments, based on the criteria for the targeting of funds from these budget lines. The Court of Auditors has general responsibility for checking the legality and regularity of underlying transactions involving these and other EC funds and for ensuring the reliability of the Commission's accounts.
Mr. Denzil Davies: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how many EU regulations and directives containing comitology powers were issued in the last 12 months. [147320]
Mr. Vaz: Many pieces of Community legislation contain implementing measures governed by comitology rules. In 1996, the total number of EU measures containing comitology powers was 4,500. No figures have been released by the Commission since then.
More in-depth information about all EU legislation is available on the internet at europa.eu.int/eur-lex.
9 Feb 2001 : Column: 749W
Mr. McDonnell: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (1) what representations the Government have made within the institutions of the European Union to enable the free movement of third-country nationals travelling from one EU member state to another; [149092]
Mrs. Roche: I have been asked to reply.
The Government have made no such representations and do not intend to do so. The right of free movement within the European Union is limited to citizens of the European Economic Area and their family members. The Government are committed to maintaining the United Kingdom's frontier controls and retaining national control over immigration policy in relation to third-country nationals. Third-country nationals wishing to travel within the European Union may do so in accordance with the requirements applicable in the member state concerned, obtaining visas if necessary.
Mr. Mitchell: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, pursuant to his answer of 23 January 2001, Official Report, columns 564-65W, concerning the consultative conferences and other activities required of European presidencies during 2001 in Annexe IV of the provisional treaty of Nice, if he will list (a) the procedures and criteria by which Her Majesty's Government will select representatives of statutory and non-statutory bodies, (b) the funds to be used for organising and running these conferences and (c) to whom such representatives will report, and how they will consult. [148396]
Mr. Vaz: The Nice treaty agreed that the consultative process should be wide and involve members of civil society. No details have yet been worked out. The Swedish presidency has been mandated to report to the Gothenburg European Council in June. We expect this report to address possible mechanisms and scope for this process.
Mr. Baker: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, pursuant to the answer to the hon. Member for Hendon (Mr. Dismore) of 29 January 2001, Official Report, column 58W, on Sir David Hannay, how many days Sir David has worked; and how much Sir David was paid in the last financial year for which figures are available. [148876]
Mr. Vaz [holding answer 5 February 2001]: During financial year 1999-2000 Sir David worked 92.5 days in London and overseas at the per diem rate of £400 per day.
Mr. Hawkins: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs on how many occasions since he became Minister for Europe the hon.
9 Feb 2001 : Column: 750W
Member for Leicester, East (Mr. Vaz) has visited India; and how many of these visits were (a) on Government business and (b) at the expense of the Hindujas or one of their companies or foundations. [149829]
Mr. Vaz: The information is as follows:
Mr. Simon Hughes: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how his Department implements the Joint Entry Clearance Unit's advice to entry clearance officers that an applicant for entry clearance should be advised of the possibility of a human rights appeal only if he or she is insistent that his or her human rights have been breached. [149530]
Mr. Vaz: All applications for entry clearance are considered under the immigration rules and since 2 October 2000 in the light of the Human Rights Act 1998. Should applicants consider that their human rights have been breached, they can make an allegation of non-compliance either at the time of interview or subsequent representations. This will be investigated. If the applicant remains dissatisfied, an appeal will be triggered.
Mr. Simon Hughes: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will provide a monthly breakdown, by entry clearance post, of the number of family visit visa refusals in relation to which (a) an appeal has been received, (b) the refusal has been overturned by an entry clearance manager after receipt of an appeal, (c) an appeal has been despatched, (d) entry clearance has been issued prior to the outcome of an appeal, (e) an appeal has been allowed and notified to the post and (f) an appeal has been dismissed and notified to the post, since October 2000. [149531]
Mr. Vaz: The breakdown on family visit refusals, appeals received, refusals overturned after receipt of an appeal and appeals despatched, covers information received from the largest 100 entry clearance posts, which submit monthly statistical returns. There are individual tables for the months of October, November and December. I regret that the information for the remaining 64 small posts (those issuing fewer than 1,200 visas a year) is not available centrally.
The information requested on the issue of entry clearance prior to the outcome of an appeal is not available centrally or locally. The entry clearance manager may only sign the appeal form if he/she decides after review that the refusal stands.
The second breakdown on appeal decisions was provided by the Lord Chancellor's Department and covers all 164 entry clearance posts. The information requested on the notification of the outcome of appeals is not
9 Feb 2001 : Column: 751W
available centrally and could be provided only at a disproportionate cost by contacting each of the 164 entry clearance posts individually. The Home Office informs
9 Feb 2001 : Column: 752W
posts on the outcome of allowed appeals. The Lord Chancellor's Department informs posts of dismissed appeals.
9 Feb 2001 : Column: 751W
File number | Country | Date fax received | Date appeal received in office | Date sent to hearing centre | Time taken to action in Lough. | Hearing centre | Date of hearing |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VV00008/2000 | Bangladesh | 5 November 2000 | 10 November 2000 | 10 November 2000 | Same day | Leeds | 30 November 2000 |
VV00010/2000 | India | 7 November 2000 | 14 November 2000 | 14 November 2000 | Same day | Taylor HS | 5 December 2000 |
VV00018/2000 | Nigeria | 13 November 2000 | 20 November 2000 | 20 November 2000 | Same day | Leeds | 7 December 2000 |
VV00027/2000 | Pakistan | n/a | 22 November 2000 | 22 November 2000 | Same day | Hatton X | 13 December 2000 |
VV00029/2000 | Pakistan | 16 November 2000 | 22 November 2000 | 22 November 2000 | Same day | Hatton X | 13 December 2000 |
VV00030/2000 | Pakistan | 16 November 2000 | 22 November 2000 | 22 November 2000 | Same day | Taylor HS | 13 December 2000 |
VV00032/2000 | Pakistan | 16 November 2000 | 22 November 2000 | 23 November 2000 | 1 day | Hatton X | 14 December 2000 |
VV00037/2000 | India | 14 November 2000 | 23 November 2000 | 23 November 2000 | Same day | Taylor HS | 13 December 2000 |
VV00042/2000 | India | 14 November 2000 | 29 November 2000 | 29 November 2000 | Same day | Hatton X | 20 December 2000 |
VV00044/2000 | Nigeria | 20 November 2000 | 29 November 2000 | 29 November 2000 | Same day | Taylor HS | 20 December 2000 |
VV00045/2000 | India | 17 November 2000 | 29 November 2000 | 29 November 2000 | Same day | Birmingham | 21 December 2000 |
VV00047/2000 | India | 16 November 2000 | 29 November 2000 | 29 November 2000 | Same day | Taylor HS | 20 December 2000 |
VV00067/2000 | Nigeria | 23 November 2000 | 4 December 2000 | 4 December 2000 | Same day | Birmingham | 21 December 2000 |
VV00082/2000 | Pakistan | 24 November 2000 | 7 December 2000 | 7 December 2000 | Same day | Taylor HS | 28 December 2000 |
VV00088/2000 | Pakistan | 6 December 2000 | 13 December 2000 | 13 December 2000 | Same day | Manchester | 3 January 2001 |
VV00103/2000 | Pakistan | n/a | 20 December 2000 | 20 December 2000 | Same day | Taylor HS | 10 January 2001 |
VV00114/2000 | Sri Lanka | n/a | 21 December 2000 | 21 December 2000 | Same day | Taylor HS | 18 January 2001 |
VV00116/2000 | Pakistan | 13 December 2000 | 21 December 2000 | 21 December 2000 | Same day | Birmingham | 11 January 2001 |
VV00120/2000 | Pakistan | 7 December 2000 | 22 December 2000 | 28 December 2000 | 2 days | Taylor HS | 12 January 2001 |
VV00121/2000 | Pakistan | 7 December 2000 | 22 December 2000 | 28 December 2000 | 2 day | Leeds | 16 January 2001 |
VV00124/2000 | Israel | ? | 28 December 2000 | 28 December 2000 | Same day | Taylor HS | 18 January 2001 |
VV00131/2000 | Pakistan | 8 December 2000 | 28 December 2000 | 28 December 2000 | Same day | Hatton X | 18 January 2001 |
VV00138/2000 | Pakistan | 8 December 2000 | 29 December 2000 | 29 December 2000 | Same day | Taylor HS | 23 January 2001 |
VV00001/2001 | Nigeria | 28 December 2000 | 3 January 2001 | 3 January 2001 | Same day | Taylor HS | 24 January 2001 |
VV00002/2001 | Pakistan | 19 December 2000 | 3 January 2001 | 3 January 2001 | Same day | Hatton X | 24 January 2001 |
VV00003/2001 | Pakistan | 19 December 2000 | 3 January 2001 | 3 January 2001 | Same day | Manchester | 24 January 2001 |
VV00005/2001 | Pakistan | 15 December 2000 | 3 January 2001 | 3 January 2001 | Same day | Leeds | 24 January 2001 |
VV00006/2001 | India | 22 December 2000 | 3 January 2001 | 3 January 2001 | Same day | Hatton X | 24 January 2001 |
VV00017/2001 | India | 19 December 2000 | 3 January 2001 | 4 January 2001 | Same day | Manchester | 25 January 2001 |
VV00019/2001 | India | 29 December 2000 | 5 January 2001 | 5 January 2001 | Same day | Birmingham | 26 January 2001 |
VV00024/2001 | Casablanca | n/a | 9 January 2001 | 9 January 2001 | Same day | Hatton X | 30 January 2001 |
VV00045/2001 | Bombay | 29 December 2000 | 15 January 2001 | 15 January 2001 | Same day | Manchester | 5 February 2001 |
VV00046/2001 | New Delhi | 5 January 2001 | 15 January 2001 | 15 January 2001 | Same day | Taylor HS | 7 February 2001 |
VV00048/2001 | Dakar | 4 January 2001 | 16 January 2001 | 16 January 2001 | Same day | Birmingham | 6 February 2001 |
VV00049/2001 | New Delhi | 9 January 2001 | 16 January 2001 | 16 January 2001 | Same day | Taylor HS | 6 February 2001 |
VV00051/2001 | Dakar | 4 January 2001 | 16 January 2001 | 16 January 2001 | Same day | Taylor HS | 6 February 2001 |
VV00058/2001 | Nigeria | 11 January 2001 | 17 January 2001 | 17 January 2001 | Same day | Taylor HS | 7 February 2001 |
VV00059/2001 | India | 2 January 2001 | 17 January 2001 | 17 January 2001 | Same day | Trafford | 6 February 2001 |
VV00063/2001 | Iran | n/a | 17 January 2001 | 18 January 2001 | 1 day | Birmingham | 8 February 2001 |
VV00065/2001 | India | 12 January 2001 | 19 January 2001 | 19 January 2001 | Same day | Hatton X | 9 February 2001 |
VV00066/2001 | Pakistan | 15 January 2001 | 19 January 2001 | 19 January 2001 | Same day | Hatton X | 9 February 2001 |
VV00068/2001 | Pakistan | 15 January 2001 | 19 January 2001 | 19 January 2001 | Same day | Hatton X | 9 February 2001 |
VV00075/2001 | Nigeria | 15 January 2001 | 22 January 2001 | 22 January 2001 | Same day | Hatton X | 12 February 2001 |
VV00077/2001 | Nigeria | 15 January 2001 | 22 January 2001 | 22 January 2001 | Same day | Taylor HS | 13 February 2001 |
VV00078/2001 | Nigeria | 15 January 2001 | 22 January 2001 | 22 January 2001 | Same day | Taylor HS | 13 February 2001 |
VV00079/2001 | Uganda | n/a | 22 January 2001 | 22 January 2001 | Same day | Taylor HS | 12 February 2001 |
VV00081/2001 | Pakistan | 9 January 2001 | 23 January 2001 | 23 January 2001 | Same day | Birmingham | 12 February 2001 |
VV00083/2001 | Nigeria | 18 January 2001 | 24 January 2001 | 24 January 2001 | Same day | Hatton X | 14 February 2001 |
VV00084/2001 | Nigeria | n/a | 24 January 2001 | 25 January 2001 | 1 day | Leeds | 14 February 2001 |
VV00085/2001 | Nigeria | n/a | 24 January 2001 | 25 January 2001 | 1 day | Leeds | 14 February 2001 |
VV00091/2001 | Turkey | 17 January 2001 | 25 January 2001 | 26 January 2001 | 1 day | Taylor HS | 16 February 2001 |
VV00100/2001 | Pakistan | n/a | 25 January 2001 | 29 January 2001 | 1 day | Glasgow | 19 February 2001 |
VV00105/2001 | Pakistan | 21 November 2000 | 29 January 2001 | 31 January 2001 | 2 days | Hatton X | 22 February 2001 |
VV00109/2001 | Pakistan | 17 January 2001 | 31 January 2001 | 31 January 2001 | Same day | Manchester | 23 February 2001 |
VV00110/2001 | India | 23 January 2001 | 31 January 2001 | 31 January 2001 | Same day | Manchester | 27 February 2001 |
VV00111/2001 | India | 29 January 2001 | 31 January 2001 | 31 January 2001 | Same day | Manchester | 27 February 2001 |
VV00112/2001 | Nigeria | 25 January 2001 | 31 January 2001 | 31 January 2001 | Same day | Taylor HS | 22 February 2001 |
VV00115/2001 | India | 29 January 2001 | 31 January 2001 | 1 February 2001 | 1 day | Hatton X | 22 February 2001 |
VV00117/2001 | Nigeria | 25 January 2001 | 1 February 2001 | 1 February 2001 | Same day | Hatton X | 23 February 2001 |
VV00119/2001 | India | 23 January 2001 | 31 January 2001 | 1 February 2001 | 1 day | Birmingham | 22 February 2001 |
VV00120/2001 | Pakistan | n/a | 1 February 2001 | 1 February 2001 | Same day | Birmingham | 22 February 2001 |
VV00121/2001 | Turkey | n/a | 2 February 2001 | 2 February 2001 | Same day | Leeds | 27 February 2001 |
VV00121/2001 | Pakistan | n/a | 6 February 2001 | 6 February 2001 | Same day | Birmingham | 26 February 2001 |
VV00123/2001 | Pakistan | n/a | 6 February 2001 | 6 February 2001 | Same day | Hatton X | 27 February 2001 |
(34) Adjourned due to Loughborough error--relisted to 8 February 2001 Birmingham
9 Feb 2001 : Column: 753W
9 Feb 2001 : Column: 755W
Mr. Simon Hughes: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what has been the total cost to his Department of collecting and refunding family visit appeal fees since 2 October 2000. [149532]
Mr. Simon Hughes: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will provide a breakdown, by entry clearance post, of the number of family visit visa applications (a) received, (b) determined, (c) allowed and (d) refused in each month since 2 October 2000. [149533]
Mr. Vaz: The breakdown gives the required details for November and December, based on statistics received from the largest 100 entry clearance posts, which submit monthly statistical returns. I regret that the information for the remaining 64 small posts is not available centrally. For the October figures, I refer to my answer to the hon. Member on 12 December 2000, Official Report, columns 125-26W.
(35) Combined total for November/December
9 Feb 2001 : Column: 756W
(36) Combined total for October/November
9 Feb 2001 : Column: 758W
9 Feb 2001 : Column: 760W
9 Feb 2001 : Column: 761W
Next Section | Index | Home Page |