Previous Section Index Home Page


Mobile Police Stations

Miss McIntosh: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what specific role mobile police stations will play in reducing crime; if they will replace (a) officers on the beat and (b) high-speed police cars; and if he will make a statement. [149452]

14 Feb 2001 : Column: 175W

Mr. Charles Clarke: A number of forces are using mobile police stations for increased visibility and accessibility, to reduce fear of crime, to enhance policing in rural areas, and as mobile custody units.

I strongly support this, and other, imaginative initiatives taking their place alongside beat officers and police vehicles as part of an overall approach to meeting local policing needs.

North Yorkshire Police

Miss McIntosh: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will make a statement reconciling the figures for numbers of North Yorkshire police in (a) the answer of the Minister of State, Home Office, the hon. Member for Norwich, South (Mr. Clarke), of 18 January 2001, Official Report, column 352W, and (b) the recent press statement made by North Yorkshire Police Authority. [148953]

Mr. Charles Clarke: At 30 September 2000 North Yorkshire police had 1,293 officers.

The Chief Constable of North Yorkshire police has advised me that for March 2002 the force projects that it will have increased its numbers to 1,420 police officers. This figure was announced by the force in its press statement of 9 January.

This increase includes 43 officers to be recruited through the Crime Fighting Fund, 60 officers to be recruited through the Rural Policing Fund, the remainder being part of normal planned force recruitment.

Police Expenditure

Mr. Cash: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the levels of spending on police services in (a) Staffordshire and (b) each other county of England (i) in the current year and (ii) in each of the last three years. [148296]

Mr. Charles Clarke: The information is set out in the table.

Police force net expenditure in England 1997-98 to 2000-01

£000
1997-981998-991999-20002000-01
Avon and Somerset152,673162,726174,336181,210
Bedfordshire58,57061,77863,61166,426
Cambridgeshire68,68173,43275,05279,244
Cheshire104,005107,093113,280114,576
City of London57,89360,35057,85258,947
Cleveland75,42681,29585,25685,600
Cumbria61,70962,53264,78667,400
Derbyshire95,641100,064105,590110,819
Devon and Cornwall155,435166,330175,055182,873
Dorset69,72773,11776,95780,996
Durham75,16674,67379,66285,775
Essex157,487156,822167,969184,485
Gloucestershire58,63362,86265,75568,695
Greater Manchester353,319354,171374,804400,004
Hampshire180,791186,661197,483202,527
Hertfordshire93,01195,068104,448120,945
Humberside106,220112,571113,944119,900
Kent174,211175,577186,261193,127
Lancashire169,275177,310182,004190,181
Leicestershire98,789102,790107,262110,150
Lincolnshire66,18466,66469,37875,725
Merseyside224,327240,267248,414257,114
Metropolitan1,676,6171,716,4251,838,8881,837,571
Norfolk80,22280,54387,18291,514
Northamptonshire64,60567,05769,14873,076
Northumbria195,092205,270212,704218,387
North Yorkshire71,84075,34478,17883,750
Nottinghamshire120,556127,018129,465134,302
South Yorkshire166,027167,159176,007181,054
Staffordshire110,264116,231127,000126,964
Suffolk63,67666,09670,50674,061
Surrey90,97691,425100,094120,130
Sussex157,631161,847165,564172,513
Thames Valley210,333209,675227,020236,952
Warwickshire51,00352,01555,16459,011
West Mercia107,788113,755111,446125,700
West Midlands360,129368,608381,484395,102
West Yorkshire281,745277,994286,088304,125
Wiltshire58,53568,81169,82371,981
England total6,524,2126,719,4267,074,9207,339,912

Source:

The Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy Police Statistics Actuals for 1997-98 to 1999-2000 and Estimates for 2000-01


14 Feb 2001 : Column: 176W

Prison Governors

Mr. Stinchcombe: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will list those prison establishments in which there have been changes at governor level, including changes involving those acting as governor for one month or more, over the last five years, the date upon which each such change took place, the name of the governor leaving and the name of his or her replacement in each case. [147561]

Mr. Boateng: I will write to my hon. Friend and place a copy of the letter in the Library.

Police Officers (Hertsmere)

Mr. Clappison: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many police officers have been available for duty in the Hertsmere police division in each year since 1992. [150048]

Mr. Charles Clarke [holding answer 12 February 2001]: I understand from the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis that before the boundary changes with the Hertfordshire constabulary on 1 April 2000 Hertsmere was part of the Barnet division. It is not possible to identify separately the number of police officers who policed Hertsmere.

I am told by the Chief Constable of Hertfordshire that for the financial year 2000-01 the Hertsmere division has an establishment of 139 police officers. On 31 January 2001 the actual number of officers available to police Hertsmere was 131 officers.

Naturalisation Applications

Mr. Lidington: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) if it is his policy for a record note to be kept of representations made by Ministers about an individual application for naturalisation; [149579]

14 Feb 2001 : Column: 177W

Mrs. Roche [holding answer 8 February 2001]: Correspondence from any source about individual applications for naturalisation would be recorded on the relevant case file or on an associated file.

Mr. Lidington: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department at what level within his Department an application for naturalisation is normally determined. [149578]

Mrs. Roche [holding answer 8 February 2001]: The level at which naturalisation applications are determined varies according to the nature and complexity of the case. The majority, however, are decided by administrative officer caseworkers.

Mr. Lidington: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what criteria govern whether an application for naturalisation is referred for personal determination by (a) the Secretary of State and (b) a Minister. [149574]

Mrs. Roche [holding answer 8 February 2001]: Applications are referred to Ministers if they are likely to be controversial or sensitive or if they raise complex issues or questions of security. Whether the Secretary of State will decide an application will depend on the circumstances of the individual case, although he will see referrals where the key issue is one concerning security.

Asylum Seekers

Mr. Simon Hughes: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what assessment he has made of the compatibility of the systematic detention of asylum seekers coming directly from their country of origin or an unsafe third country with the 1951 UN convention on refugees and the 1999 UNHCR guidelines on applicable criteria and standards relating to the detention of asylum seekers; and if he will make a statement. [149548]

Mrs. Roche [holding answer 12 February 2001]: Detention of asylum seekers is used as a last resort and no one is detained simply because he or she has claimed asylum. However, detention may be appropriate in the following circumstances; in order to establish identity or basis of claim; where there are reasonable grounds for believing that the subject will fail to comply with the terms of temporary admission or release; or where removal is imminent.

Unaccompanied children are detained only in the most exceptional circumstances. We are therefore satisfied that our detention policy is consistent with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees criteria.

Mr. Llwyd: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) by what criteria the applications of asylum seekers are judged by the Government; and if he will list them; [149919]

Mrs. Roche: All asylum applications, regardless of the applicant's nationality, are considered in accordance with the criteria set out in the 1951 United Nations convention relating to the status of refugees. To qualify for asylum a person must be outside his/her country of nationality and have a well founded fear of persecution for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social

14 Feb 2001 : Column: 178W

group or political opinion. Those who meet these criteria are granted asylum; those who do not meet the requirements of the 1951 convention may nevertheless be granted exceptional leave to remain in the United Kingdom if there are exceptional compelling humanitarian reasons why they should not be required to leave.

Those who do not qualify for asylum or exceptional leave to remain and have no other basis on which to remain are required to leave the United Kingdom. The process for considering an asylum claim does not involve us taking a view on whether an applicant is an "economic migrant".

Mr. Llwyd: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department by what means the United Kingdom Government ensures the welfare of asylum seekers who are not permanently admitted into the United Kingdom; and if he will make a statement. [149918]

Mrs. Roche: The Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 introduced new support arrangements for asylum seekers. Under these new arrangements all new eligible destitute asylum seekers may be supported by the National Asylum Support Service (NASS). This support is mainly in kind and includes accommodation where requested. Asylum seekers whose claims have been finally determined as unfounded are not eligible for NASS support. However, families with children under the age of 18 will be supported by NASS until they leave the country.

Mr. Llwyd: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will make a statement on the process by which decisions are made on the applications of asylum-seekers in the United Kingdom, including the reference to the officials who are responsible for the decisions. [149920]

Mrs. Roche: All applications for asylum are considered by specially trained officers in the Immigration and Nationality Directorate of the Home Office.

The officers consider applications against the criteria set out in the 1951 United Nations convention relating to the status of refugees; each claim is examined individually on its merits. The caseworking officers have access to detailed country assessments to support them when considering asylum claims.

Mr. Tony Lloyd: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when he intends to send the result of the decisions on asylum for (a) Mr. M. (HO Ref: RV181199167) and (b) Mr. A. (HO Ref: A522615). [149758]

Mrs. Roche: (a) Mr. M. will shortly be invited to attend an interview in Liverpool during the week commencing 5 March. A decision will be made as soon as is practicable thereafter.

(b) Mr. A. was granted indefinite leave to remain on 12 February and will shortly be notified of this decision.

I am sorry for the delay in informing my hon. Friend's constituents of the progress of their cases.

Miss Widdecombe: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what percentage of asylum applicants who have been refused refugee status or exceptional leave to remain sought to appeal against that decision in the last year for which figures are available; and if he will make a statement. [150047]

14 Feb 2001 : Column: 179W

Mrs. Roche [holding answer 12 February 2001]: The information is not available in the form requested. In the year 2000, there were 78,180 initial decisions to refuse asylum and exceptional leave to remain. Also in the year 2000, there were 46,190 appeals lodged with the Home Office. However, these appeals will not all necessarily relate to decisions made in the same year. These figures are subject to revision.

Miss Widdecombe: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the average time taken for asylum applicants to receive an initial decision on their asylum application is; and if he will make a statement. [150046]

Mrs. Roche [holding answer 12 February 2001]: Although 2000 statistics are not yet available, the average time taken to reach an initial decision in December 2000 is estimated to have been 13 months.


Next Section Index Home Page