|Previous Section||Index||Home Page|
Ms Walley: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how much certified timber has been purchased over the past six months; and what proportion of total timber purchases this represents. 
Ms Hewitt: The Department of Trade and Industry has an environmental management system in place accredited to BSEN ISO 14001. Within that system DTI has "opted in" to include the procurement of timber and timber products to ensure that such items are procured in accordance with the Government's commitment on buying from sustainable and legal sources.
The interdepartmental timber working group is working to develop a common reporting template which will form the basis for future reporting by all Departments on timber procurement. However, that system is not yet in place, and DTI is unable to provide data on the proportion of certified timber purchased over the last six months without incurring disproportionate costs.
6 Mar 2001 : Column: 142W
Mrs. Brinton: To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions (1) if it is his policy that alternative options should be considered in undertaking an appraisal under the Government's new approach to appraisal for major road schemes; 
Authorities (including the Highways Agency) submitting proposals for all major road schemes as part of their plans were required to follow the Guidance on the New Approach to Appraisal (GNATA). The GNATA appraisal summary table (AST) includes a box for a statement of other options considered when putting forward a road proposal.
Where major public transport schemes formed part of plans, authorities were asked to include an appropriate assessment of the proposed scheme against alternative options, including an AST for each. However, production of separate ASTs was not considered necessary where the choice between options was clear-cut or the scheme was in relative terms small, so in practice ASTs for alternative options were prepared for about half of the major public transport schemes given full or provisional approval in the local transport settlement.
Mr. Loughton: To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions (1) how many staff are employed by regional development agencies in offices outside the United Kingdom; at which locations; and at what cost; 
Ms Beverley Hughes [holding answer 26 February 2001]: The table sets out the offices currently maintained by the regional development agencies outside England, with details of how many staff are employed by regional development agencies in offices outside the United Kingdom; where; and at what cost and where facilities are shared with each other and other Government agencies or local authority offices.
The table has been updated since the answer given by my right hon. Friend the Minister for Local Government and Regions on 25 January 2001, Official Report, columns 667-70W. Yorkshire Forward has opened an
6 Mar 2001 : Column: 143W
office in Brussels since the original question was answered. In addition, the information given for North West Development Agency and One NorthEast in the previous answer was not complete and this has been corrected in the table.
6 Mar 2001 : Column: 144W
A condition of funding for 2001-02 will be that ministerial prior approval will be required for any proposal to extend or create new RDA overseas offices involved in inward investment or trade promotion activities.
6 Mar 2001 : Column: 143W
|RDA/Office location||Opened||Number of employees||Annual cost to RDAs (£)||Other comments|
|Brussels||February 2001||3 full-time||30,000||Yorkshire Forward contributes to costs. Office is run and staff are employed by Regional Assembly|
|North West Development Agency|
|Japan||Late 1980s||2 part-time||50,000||Also have Marketing Agents since 1993 operating in Taiwan (£20,000)|
|Europe||July 2000||1 full-time||45,000||Co-funded by the Regional Assembly in an office co-habited by Sub Regional Officers (Lancashire, Cheshire, Manchester, Merseyside)|
|Advantage West Midlands|
|Brussels||November 2000||6 full-time||170,000||The West Midlands in Europe Office is a joint office with the West Midlands Local Government Association, Higher Education, the CBI, NEC Group, Engineering Employers Federation, Chambers of Commerce, Voluntary Sector, Further Education and has close links with Eversheds and PWC. The total cost is £500,000 of which the RDA contributes £170,000|
|One rep in Germany since September 2000, that incurs salary costs only of £80,000.|
|One part-time rep in Taiwan since April 1998, incurring salary costs only of £40,000|
|Two part-time agents in Korea since April 1996, incurring salary costs of only £20,000|
|From January 2001 six month contract for one rep in Australia incurring salary costs of £65,000|
|East of England Development Agency|
|Europe||Contribute 4 per cent. of total cost of office to East of England European Partnership Office in Brussels. The office is sponsored by local authorities and the seven TECS in the region.|
|EEDA's contribution is £12,000|
|North America||East of England Investment Agency, who carry out inward investment on behalf of EEDA, have a number of strategic alliances overseas, but at negligible cost. There is one part-time marketing agent in the USA at an annual cost of £5,000|
|East Midlands Development Agency|
|(Germany)||2 part-time agents||28,000|
|Asia Pacific||1 part-time agent||50,000|
|2 part-time agents|
|South East of England Development Agency|
|Brussels||September 2000||1 full-time(8)||79,000||Collaborative office with South East Local Authorities and Regional Assembly|
|South West of England Regional Development Agency|
|North America||Also have five staff working from their homes in Sonoma California, Chicago, and Boston|
|The total cost of American and Japanese operations is £565,000 (£391,000 from public and private sector partners)|
|Korea||1990||1 x 0.5||30,000|
|Brussels||September 1992||43,000(10)||The Agency makes a financial contribution towards the running costs, including staff costs of the North of England Office in Brussels, which is a partnership for the region|
|50,000(11)||The office also receives funding from the North East Regional Assembly|
|North of England Collaborative Office|
|(Chicago, Boston(12), Atlanta(12), West Coast)||October 2000||15 full-time(13)||500,000||Joint operations between; One NorthEast, North West Development Agency and Yorkshire Forward|
|Official Launch February 2001|
|Total cost of the Collaborative Office is £1 million. 50 per cent. of costs come from other public and private sector funding|
|Balance met equally between the three RDAs|
|Midlands Collaborative US Office|
|Chicago||October 2000||2 full-time||448,000(14)||Pre-September 2000 EMDA had office in Virginia at annual cost of £90,000|
|San Diego||October 2000||2 full-time reps||Joint operation between East and West Midlands|
|Pittsburgh||May 1992||Cost is shared between each RDA|
|Midlands Collaborative Japanese Office|
|Japan||1997||2 full-time||200,000||As above|
|London First Centre|
|Asia Pacific||Please note that London First Centre are a private company limited by guarantee, and they carry out inward investment promotion on behalf of London Development Agency.|
|North America||No overseas offices, however do use consultants/agents in selected locations|
|0.5 of two people in Taiwan since 1998, cost £22,500|
|0.5 of one person in Korea since 1998, cost £7,500|
|Two agents in USA since 1996, cost £165,000|
(8) Regional Assembly contributes 50 per cent. to salary of full-time officer.
(9) Combined cost of American and Japanese operations.
(12) Operations in Boston and Atlanta predate the establishment of the Collaborative Office
(14) Includes UK seconded staff costs
6 Mar 2001 : Column: 145W
6 Mar 2001 : Column: 145W
|Next Section||Index||Home Page|