TREASURY
Unemployment (London)
Ms Harman:
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) what the percentage was of the workforce in (a) London and (b) each London borough which was unemployed (i) in 1996 and (ii) at the latest date for which figures are available; [152199]
(2) how many people were (a) unemployed and (b) unemployed for over two years in (i) London and (ii) each London borough (A) in 1996 and (B) at the latest date for which figures are available. [152201]
Miss Melanie Johnson:
The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician. I have asked him to reply.
Letter from John Pullinger to Ms Harriet Harman, dated 8 March 2001:
The National Statistician has been asked to reply to your recent questions about the percentage of the workforce that is unemployed in London and unemployment figures for London and London Boroughs. (152199, 152201). I am replying in his absence.
8 Mar 2001 : Column: 332W
The Labour Force Survey (LFS) is the main source of labour market data on individuals used by National Statistics. The tables below show the International Labour Organisation (ILO) unemployment rates and the number of people unemployed in Greater London and by Borough. Both tables show the averages of December 1995 to November 1996-to represent 1996-and December 1999 to November 2000-to provide the latest available annual average.
The measure of unemployment derived from the LFS is defined on a consistent and internationally recognised basis set out by the ILO. It counts as unemployed people who are (a) without a paid job, (b) available to start work within the next two weeks and (c) have either looked for work in the last four weeks or are waiting to start a job already obtained.
Table 1: ILO unemployment rates for people in Greater London by Borough
| | Percentage(23)
|
| Average December 1995 to November 1996 | Average December 1999 to November 2000
|
Greater London | 11.3 | 7.2
|
Barking and Dagenham | 11.7 | (24)--
|
Barnet | 10.0 | 6.3
|
Bexley | 8.7 | (24)--
|
Brent | 12.3 | 11.4
|
Bromley | 6.5 | 4.5
|
Camden | 11.9 | 8.1
|
Croydon | 9.7 | 5.2
|
Ealing | 11.0 | 7.7
|
Enfield | 8.1 | 6.4
|
Greenwich | 13.9 | 9.6
|
Hackney | 22.1 | 15.2
|
Hammersmith and Fulham | 11.6 | (24)--
|
Haringey | 13.4 | 10.9
|
Harrow | 8.0 | 5.3
|
Havering | 8.0 | (24)--
|
Hillingdon | 5.6 | 4.5
|
Hounslow | 12.3 | (24)--
|
Islington | 14.7 | (24)--
|
Kensington and Chelsea | 9.9 | 9.8
|
Kingston upon Thames | (24)-- | (24)--
|
Lambeth | 18.3 | 8.7
|
Lewisham | 15.5 | 5.5
|
Merton | (24)-- | (24)--
|
Newham | 20.2 | 16.4
|
Redbridge | 8.7 | 7.3
|
Richmond upon Thames | (24)-- | (24)--
|
Southwark | 22.6 | 12.9
|
Sutton | 6.3 | (24)--
|
Tower Hamlets | 19.3 | 12.3
|
Waltham Forest | 11.8 | 7.3
|
Wandsworth | 9.7 | 4.6
|
Westminster | 13.9 | 7.6
|
(23) Not seasonally adjusted
(24) Figure too small for reliable estimate
Source:
ONS Labour Force Survey
8 Mar 2001 : Column: 331W
Table 2: Number of ILO unemployed in Greater London by borough Thousands(25)
| Average December 1995 to November 1996 | Average December 1999 to November 2000
|
| All unemployed | Unemployed for more than 2 years | All unemployed | Unemployed for more than 2 years
|
Greater London | 403 | 106 | 262 | 40
|
Barking and Dagenham | 9 | (26)-- | (26)-- | (26)--
|
Barnet | 16 | (26)-- | 11 | (26)--
|
Bexley | 10 | (26)-- | (26)-- | (26)--
|
Brent | 15 | (26)-- | 15 | (26)--
|
Bromley | 10 | (26)-- | 7 | (26)--
|
Camden | 12 | (26)-- | 7 | (26)--
|
Croydon | 17 | (26)-- | 9 | (26)--
|
Ealing | 16 | (26)-- | 11 | (26)--
|
Enfield | 11 | (26)-- | 9 | (26)--
|
Greenwich | 14 | (26)-- | 10 | (26)--
|
Hackney | 17 | 7 | 13 | (26)--
|
Hammersmith and Fulham | 10 | (26)-- | (26)-- | (26)--
|
Haringey | 13 | (26)-- | 12 | (26)--
|
Harrow | 9 | (26)-- | 6 | (26)--
|
Havering | 10 | (26)-- | (26)-- | (26)--
|
Hillingdon | 7 | (26)-- | 6 | (26)--
|
Hounslow | 12 | (26)-- | (26)-- | (26)--
|
Islington | 13 | (26)-- | (26)-- | (26)--
|
Kensington and Chelsea | 8 | (26)-- | 8 | (26)--
|
Kingston upon Thames | (26)-- | (26)-- | (26)-- | (26)--
|
Lambeth | 28 | 7 | 12 | (26)--
|
Lewisham | 20 | (26)-- | 7 | (26)--
|
Merton | (26)-- | (26)-- | (26)-- | (26)--
|
Newham | 19 | (26)-- | 15 | (26)--
|
Redbridge | 10 | (26)-- | 8 | (26)--
|
Richmond upon Thames | (26)-- | (26)-- | (26)-- | (26)--
|
Southwark | 23 | 8 | 15 | (26)--
|
Sutton | 6 | (26)-- | (26)-- | (26)--
|
Tower Hamlets | 14 | (26)-- | 10 | (26)--
|
Waltham Forest | 13 | (26)-- | 9 | (26)--
|
Wandsworth | 14 | (26)-- | 7 | (26)--
|
Westminster | 14 | (26)-- | 9 | (26)--
|
(25) Not seasonally adjusted
(26) Figure too small for reliable estimate
Source:
ONS Labour Force Survey
8 Mar 2001 : Column: 333W
8 Mar 2001 : Column: 333W
Pay (London)
Ms Harman:
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what the average pay was in London (a) in 1996 and (b) at the latest date for which figures are available. [152203]
Miss Melanie Johnson:
The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician. I have asked him to reply.
Letter from Karen Dunnell to Ms Harriet Harman, dated 8 March 2001:
The National Statistician has been asked to reply to your recent question on average pay in London (152203). I am replying in his absence.
The NES shows that in London, the average weekly pay was £455.5 in 1996 and £529.8 in 2000, the latest date for which figures are available. The figures provided are for full-time employees on adult rates of pay, whose pay for the survey period was not affected by absence.
The New Earnings Survey (NES), carried out in April of each year, is the most comprehensive source of earnings information in Great Britain. However, it underestimates the number of low pay jobs since it does not provide a comprehensive picture of the lower end of the earnings distribution.
Jobs (London)
Ms Harman:
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many jobs there were (a) in 1996 and (b) at the latest date for which figures are available in (i) London and (ii) each London borough. [152193]
Miss Melanie Johnson:
The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician. I have asked him to reply.
8 Mar 2001 : Column: 334W
Letter from Len Cook to Ms Harriet Harman, dated 8 March 2001:
As National Statistician I have been asked to reply to your recent question on the number of jobs in the economy in London and each London borough in 1996 and at the latest date for which figures are available.
The Annual Employment Survey (AES) gives an estimate of the number of employee jobs in September of each year. Estimates for 1996 and 1998 (the latest year for which comparable figures are available) may be obtained from the NOMIS database in the House of Commons Library.