Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
Mr. Watts: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office if she will publish the latest figures showing the volume of correspondence received by Ministers and agency chief executives from hon. Members in 2000, indicating the target times set for replies and the replies sent within those target times. [157532]
Marjorie Mowlam: The following table sets out Departments' and Agencies' performance in handling hon. Members' correspondence during the 2000 calendar year. It also sets out comparative figures for 1999
6 Apr 2001 : Column: 325W
(first published on 17 April 2000, Official Report, columns 386-89W). I am pleased to report that the table shows a steady improvement in overall performance.
6 Apr 2001 : Column: 326W
Hon. Members' attention is drawn to the footnotes which accompany the table and which provide general background information on how the figures are compiled.
6 Apr 2001 : Column: 325W
(18) Includes correspondence on the Intervention Board
(19) Letter addressed to the Law Officers but subsequently replied to by the Director of Public Prosecutions. In addition, the CPS received 490 letters direct from MPs between 1 January and 31 December 2000, of which 96 per cent. were replied to within 15 workings days
(20) Includes all ministerial replies, not only replies to letters from MPs
(21) Includes letters from MPs, MDLs, MEPs and Peers. Also includes 293 letters where Agency chief executives replied on Ministers' behalf
(22) 90 per cent. of letters from MPs replied to within 20 working days
(23) Include 139 cases relating to Wales
(24) Excluding correspondence on migration and visa matters
(25) Correspondence on migration and visa matters only
(26) In addition, the chief executive of the Food Standards Agency replied to 537 letters from MPs on behalf of Health Ministers
(27) Excluding correspondence on Prison Service matters
(28) Excluding correspondence on Immigration and Nationality matters, the Home Office replied to 76 per cent. of letters from MPs within 15 working days
(29) Correspondence on Prison Service matters. The 20 working day target takes account of particular geographical circumstances. The target is the same whether replies are sent by Ministers or by the Director General
(30) Local office and "delegated" figures (where local officials have replied direct to MPs)
(31) Excludes letters from MPs to Ministers where Agency chief executives have replied on Ministers' behalf
(32) Target reduced from 20 to 15 workings days on 1 April 2000
(33) Includes letters where the chief executive has replied on Ministers' behalf
(34) Includes 113 letters where the chief executive replied on Ministers' behalf
(35) Performance has improved under the new chief executive. Since September 2000, between 85 per cent. and 95 per cent. of all correspondence from MPs has been replied to within the 20 working day target
(36) Includes 18 letters where the chief executive replied on Ministers' behalf
(37) Includes 313 letters where the chief executive replied on Ministers' behalf
(38) Includes 309 letters where the chief executive replied on Ministers' behalf
(39) Includes eight letters where the chief executive replied on Ministers' behalf
(40) These figures cover the Wales Office's first year of existence and first full parliamentary session. This has been a difficult period. However, the Office has now reviewed its procedures and has introduced a new system for handling MPs' correspondence
Notes on 2000 figures:
The 1999 figures are taken from 17 April 2000, Official Report, columns 386-87W. Please also refer to the notes given with that reply. Departments and Agencies which received a total of between one and 10 letters from MPs during 2000 are not shown in this table
6 Apr 2001 : Column: 327W
6 Apr 2001 : Column: 327W
Mrs. Roe: To ask the Secretary of State for Health when he will reply to the letters from the hon. Member for Broxbourne, of 27 September, 24 October, 22 November and 22 December 2000 and 8 January 2001, relating to Mr. Dino Costas of Goffs Oak. [146896]
Mr. Denham [holding answer 23 January 2001]: A reply to the hon. Member's letter was sent on 5 April 2001.
Mrs. Roe: To ask the Secretary of State for Health when he will substantively reply to the letters from the hon. Member for Broxbourne of 27 September 2000, 24 October 2000, 22 November 2000, 22 December 2000 and 8 January and the written questions replied to on 23 January relating to Mr. Dino Costas of Goffs Oak, Hertfordshire. [151678]
Mr. Denham [holding answer 1 March 2001]: A reply to the hon. Member's letter was sent on 5 April 2001.
6 Apr 2001 : Column: 328W
I apologise for the unacceptable delay in replying to the hon. Member's correspondence and the previous parliamentary question. I know the Department's Permanent Secretary/Chief Executive of the National Health Service has written to the hon. Member apologising for the unacceptable delay involved in replying to her correspondence. The hon. Member's constituent raised a number of sensitive issues, which required a full investigation to ensure the information provided was correct, ensuring the constituent received a full explanation. This involved liaising with two different health authorities and a number of different sections within these health authorities.
Next Section | Index | Home Page |