Select Committee on Public Accounts Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence


APPENDIX 3

Supplementary memorandum submitted by Royal Armouries International PLC (PAC 00-01/177) (continued)

VISITOR NUMBERS LEVEL OFF AT 350,000 WITH DELAYED CLARENCE DOCK BENEFITS

2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
250,000
270,000
290,000
310,000
330,000
2,320,699
2,436,557
2,556,756
2,681,443
2,810,766
0
75,600
205,200
338,043
447,572
-2,030,522
-2,092,131
-2,129,611
-2,267,017
-2,382,407
290,177
420,026
632,345
752,469
875,932
-12,116,123
-12,479,259
-12,732,127
-12,786,311
-12,723,293
-653,313
-672,894
-686,529
-689,451
-686,053
290,177
420,026
632,345
752,469
875,932
-12,479,259
-12,732,127
-12,786,311
-12,723,293
-12,533,414


VISITOR NUMBERS LEVEL OFF AT 400,000 WITH ALL FREE ADMISSIONS WITH DELAYED CLARENCE DOCK BENEFITS

Dock benefits

2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
300,000
350,000
400,000
400,000
400,000
2,461,772
2,667,916
2,882,828
2,954,899
3,028,771
0
98,000
247,000
364,729
468,847
-2,062,829
-2,145,114
-2,204,284
-2,329,641
-2,432,332
398,943
620,802
925,544
989,987
1,065,286
-12,073,678
-12,325,759
-12,369,575
-12,111,010
-11,774,061
-651,025
-664,617
-666,980
-653,038
-634,869
398,943
620,802
925,544
989,987
1,065,286
-12,325,759
-12,369,575
-12,111,010
-11,774,061
-11,343,644


VISITOR NUMBERS LEVEL OFF AT 350,000 WITH DELAYED CLARENCE DOCK BENEFITS

2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
350,000
350,000
350,000
350,000
350,000
2,944,880
3,018,502
3,093,964
3,171,313
3,250,596
464,992
476,617
488,532
500,746
513,264
-2,455,438
-2,515,674
-2,577,416
-2,640,701
-2,705,569
954,434
979,445
1,005,081
1,031,358
1,058,292
-12,533,414
-12,254,794
-11,936,141
-11,574,668
-11,167,428
-675,814
-660,791
-643,609
-624,118
-602,159
954,434
979,445
1,005,081
1,031,358
1,058,292
-12,254,794
-11,936,141
-11,574,668
-11,167,428
-10,711,295


VISITOR NUMBERS LEVEL OFF AT 400,000 WITH ALL FREE ADMISSIONS WITH DELAYED CLARENCE DOCK BENEFITS

2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
400,000
400,000
400,000
400,000
400,000
3,104,491
3,182,103
3,261,655
3,343,197
3,426,777
480,568
492,582
504,897
517,519
530,457
-2,491,990
-2,553,140
-2,615,818
-2,680,064
-2,745,915
1,093,069
1,121,545
1,150,734
1,180,652
1,211,319
-11,343,644
-10,862,236
-10,326,393
-9,732,469
-9,076,601
-611,661
-585,703
-556,809
-524,784
-489,419
1,093,069
1,121,545
1,150,734
1,180,652
1,211,319
-10,862,236
-10,326,393
-9,732,469
-9,076,601
-8,354,702


VISITOR NUMBERS LEVEL OFF AT 350,000 WITH DELAYED CLARENCE DOCK BENEFITS

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
350,000
350,000
350,000
350,000
350,000
3,331,861
3,415,158
3,500,537
3,588,050
3,677,751
526,096
539,248
552,729
566,548
580,711
-2,772,058
-2,840,209
-2,910,065
-2,981,666
-3,055,058
1,085,899
1,114,197
1,143,201
1,172,931
1,203,405
-10,711,295
-10,202,960
-9,638,917
-9,015,456
-8,328,647
-577,564
-550,154
-519,740
-486,122
-449,089
1,085,899
1,114,197
1,143,201
1,172,931
1,203,405
-10,202,960
-9,638,917
-9,015,456
-8,328,647
-7,574,331


VISITOR NUMBERS LEVEL OFF AT 400,000 WITH ALL FREE ADMISSIONS WITH DELAYED CLARENCE DOCK BENEFITS

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
400,000
400,000
400,000
400,000
400,000
3,512,446
3,600,257
3,690,264
3,782,520
3,877,083
543,719
557,312
571,244
585,526
600,164
-2,813,413
-2,882,599
-2,953,514
-3,026,201
-3,100,707
1,242,752
1,274,970
1,307,995
1,341,844
1,376,541
-8,354,702
-7,562,444
-6,695,248
-5,748,268
-4,716,376
-450,494
-407,775
-361,014
-309,952
-254,312
1,242,752
1,274,970
1,307,995
1,341,844
1,376,541
-7,562,444
-6,695,248
-5,748,268
-4,716,376
-3,594,148


VISITOR NUMBERS LEVEL OFF AT 350,000 WITH DELAYED CLARENCE DOCK BENEFITS

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
350,000
350,000
350,000
350,000
350,000
3,769,695
3,863,937
3,960,536
4,059,549
4,161,038
595,229
610,110
625,363
640,997
657,022
-3,130,284
-3,207,392
-3,286,426
-3,367,437
-3,450,473
1,234,640
1,266,656
1,299,472
1,333,109
1,367,587
-7,574,331
-6,748,107
-5,845,315
-4,861,028
-3,790,031
-408,415
-363,865
-315,185
-262,112
-204,362
1,234,640
1,266,656
1,299,472
1,333,109
1,367,587
-6,478,107
-5,845,315
-4,861,028
-3,790,031
-2,626,806


VISITOR NUMBERS LEVEL OFF AT 400,000 WITH ALL FREE ADMISSIONS WITH DELAYED CLARENCE DOCK BENEFITS

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
400,000
400,000
400,000
400,000
400,000
3,974,010
4,073,361
4,175,195
4,279,575
4,386,564
615,168
630,547
646,311
662,468
679,030
-3,177,074
-3,255,351
-3,335,585
-3,417,824
-3,502,120
1,412,104
1,448,557
1,485,921
1,524,219
1,563,474
-3,594,148
-2,375,844
-1,055,395
373,618
1,917,982
-193,800
-128,108
-56,908
20,146
103,420
1,412,104
1,448,557
1,485,921
1,524,219
1,563,474
-2,375,844
-1,055,395
373,618
1,917,982
3,584,876


VISITOR NUMBERS LEVEL OFF AT 350,000 WITH DELAYED CLARENCE DOCK BENEFITS

2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
350,000
350,000
350,000
350,000
350,000
4,265,064
4,371,691
4,480,983
4,593,007
4,707,833
673,447
690,283
707,540
725,229
743,360
-3,535,585
-3,622,824
-3,712,245
-3,803,901
-3,897,849
1,402,927
1,439,150
1,476,278
1,514,335
1,553,344
-2,626,806
-1,365,519
0
1,476,278
3,070,216
-141,640
-73,630
0
79,602
165,549
1,402,927
1,439,150
1,476,278
1,514,335
1,553,344
-1,365,519
0
1,476,278
3,070,216
4,789,109


VISITOR NUMBERS LEVEL OFF AT 400,000 WITH ALL FREE ADMISSIONS WITH DELAYED CLARENCE DOCK BENEFITS

2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
400,000
400,000
400,000
  
  
4,496,228
4,608,634
4,723,850
  
  
696,006
713,406
731,241
  
  
-3,588,523
-3,677,086
-3,767,863
  
  
1,603,711
1,644,954
1,687,227
  
  
3,584,876
5,381,887
7,317,037
  
  
193,300
290,197
394,542
  
  
1,603,711
1,644,954
1,687,227
  
  
5,381,887
7,317,037
9,398,807
  
  


VISITOR NUMBERS LEVEL OFF AT 350,000 WITH DELAYED CLARENCE DOCK BENEFITS

2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
350,000
350,000
350,000
  
  
4,825,528
4,946,167
5,069,821
  
  
761,944
780,992
800,517
  
  
-3,994,145
-4,092,848
-4,194,020
  
  
1,593,327
1,634,311
1,676,318
  
  
4,789,109
6,640,670
8,633,052
  
  
258,234
358,072
465,503
  
  
1,593,327
1,634,311
1,676,318
  
  
6,640,670
8,633,052
10,774,873
  
  


NOTE 4: A SUMMARY BY DCMS OF REPORTS PRESENTED TO THE ROYAL ARMOURIES AND ROYAL ARMOURIES INTERNATIONAL PLC 1991-2000

A.  PRE-LAUNCH REPORTS

Strategy 2000: Public Attitudes and Reactions—by MORI for the Royal Armouries—February 1991

  The report sets out the results of a survey to establish the critical mass required for the success of the Royal Armouries as a visitor attraction out of the Tower and the admission charges that would optimise visitors and visitor income. The report concluded that:

    48 per cent of respondents would visit the museum were it located within an hour of their home;

    16 per cent would travel further;

    four out of five respondents would pay £5 for a year's admission;

    just over half would pay £10 for a year's admission; and

    a Leeds site would offer a visitor potential of 1.2 million assuming an annual season ticket of £5.

The Royal Armouries at Clarence Dock—by MORI for the Royal Armouries—August 1992

  The report concluded that "interest in the new Royal Armouries is high, despite only modest interest in the subject of Arms and Armour per se . . . at a price of £5 per single adult entry, potential attendance in the opening year might be a little over 900,000 visitors." MORI found that visitors seemed to be very price-sensitive ie at £6 the Armouries would receive 500,000 and at £7 visitors were likely to be around 250,000.

Royal Armouries at Clarence Dock—Validation of Visitor Income and Potential: by Grant Leisure for the Royal Armouries—October 1992

  The report recommended an adult price of £5 (£3 for children over four and under 16). It said that "the price has been well-supported by consumer research but there is sharp drop-off in predisposition to visit once the £5 price level is exceeded." The report forecast 1,157,000 visitors in the first year rising to 1,299,000 in year three.

The Royal Armouries in Leeds—Initial Briefing Memorandum: by Schroders for the Royal Armouries—March 1993

  The purpose of this report was to inform potential investors of the background, status and proposed structure of the Royal Armouries' Leeds project and to provide an outline of the proposed financing plan. Based on the work of MORI the report envisaged a build up, over three years, to a visitor figure of 1,300,000 per annum, with all illustrative visitor revenue projections annually increasing with inflation.

Gardner Merchant/Heritage Projects—Proposal for Operational Management and Visitor Validation for RAI plc—September 1993

  Envisaged 650,000 visitors in 1996.

  Confirmed that operation would be in partnership with Heritage Projects, the designers and operators of the Jorvik Viking Centre (which, at the time was attracting in excess of 900,000 visitors per annum) and a number of other major historic leisure projects.

A presentation to the Royal Armouries: by Barrington Johnson Lorains for RAI plc/Royal Armouries re Advertising Strategy—January 1995

  Envisaged 800,000 visitors per annum.

Royal Armouries, Leeds Benchmark Research: by MEW for RAI plc—March 1995

  Forecast:

    1,083,000 visitors at £5.95 per single adult ticket;

    850,000 visitors at £6.95 per single adult ticket; and

    569,000 visitors at £7.95 per single adult ticket.

B.  POST-LAUNCH REPORTS

The Royal Armouries in Leeds—An independent review of the 1997 Marketing Strategy and Plans: by Lifetime Business Group for RAI plc and 3i Group plc—February 1997

  Concluded that the original MORI estimates were unrealistically optimistic. Insufficient regard was given to the time gap between "intention" and "action" ie "the lag that always exists between a potential customer interest in a new product and the practical opportunity to actually experience it—especially if that purchase/experience requires a drive of an hour or more." Penetration rates for the 0 to 30 minute market were 8 per cent, for the 30 minute to one hour market 1.6 per cent and for the one hour to two hour market 0.6 per cent. This compared with pre-launch forecasts of 8 per cent for the 0 to one hour market and 2.8 per cent for the one hour to two hour market. Typical visitors were much more local, more middle class (ABC1 families with children) and more car-dependent than was envisaged originally. The report also concluded that: "price does not seem to be a major reason for a non-visit . . . there is evidence to show that the Royal Armouries is currently under-pricing itself, in peak times of demand, in spite of acknowledging that it charges one of the highest rates for any museum in the UK."

Review of Operations and Potential for Performance Enhancement at the Royal Armouries Museum, Leeds: by Economics Research Associates for RAI plc and the Bank of Scotland—March 1997

  Recommended a number of options to increase revenues and enhance performance:

    —  creation of a softer image to make the museum more attractive to women;

    —  conversion of parts of the ground floor to increase commercial potential; and

    —  increase price of late entry tickets.

  The report concluded that the first year's marketing effort has generated strong penetration rates within the one hour market . . . a significant marketing effort should be made to expand the appeal into the large one to two hour catchment market.

Review of Performance and Assessment of Future Potential for the Royal Armouries Museum by Economics Research Associates for RAI plc—January 1998

  Concluded that the concept-testing methodology employed by MORI and MEW where a respondents anticipated behaviour is translated into future patterns, is one which is commonly used in the fast-moving consumer goods and other retail product areas. But it is not appropriate as a primary measure in projecting attendance levels at a leisure attraction. ERA recommended the market penetration approach. This takes the market penetration rates achieved by comparable attractions and subjects them to factors specific to the project such as attraction size, content, theme, design, quality, location, catchment market, competitive environment, investment levels and experience of the management team. ERA concluded that annual attendance at the Royal Armouries museum in Leeds would range from 410,000 to 565,000 (once the Clarence Dock development was complete).


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2001
Prepared 30 July 2001