|
In Published
Report
| Current
Information
|
1.Executive Summary, Paragraph 1
|
Numbers of Service Quarters | 63,000
| 61,000 |
Underleased from AHL | 53,000 (84%)
| 50,500 (83%) |
2.Executive Summary, Paragraph 3
|
Percentage of total properties | 23%
| 23.5% |
Numbers of empty homes | 14,425
| 14,352* |
* Headline count does not reflect changes in status of empty properties, included within this overall classification. Properties where the contractual six month notice of release to AHL as been served are retained within the above total until the end of their notice periods. The percentage of empty homes to total properties is expected to fall to some 18 per cent by 31 March 2001 as a consequence of planned disposals between now and 31 March 2001.
|
3.Executive Summary, Paragraph 4
|
Numbers of homes empty for over six months |
3,800 | 632
|
Numbers of homes empty for over three years
| 346 | 50
|
Number of properties allocated for deployment, modernisation, disposal or demolition
| 4,900 | 9,300*
|
Number of properties allocated for other defence uses, occupied by families whose entitlement had ceased or were leased to third parties
| 2,200 | 2,162
|
* This reflects the increased disposal effort and SDR deployment requirements.
|
4.Executive Summary, Paragraph 5
|
Cost (AHL rent and maintenance) of empty homes
| £39m | £41m
|
5.Executive Summary, Paragraph 11
|
Numbers of DHE Area Offices | 24
| 20 |
6.Executive Summary, Paragraph 20
|
Surpluses disposed of since April 1995 | over 8,000 | over 9,000
|
7.Part 1: Paragraph 1.1
|
Numbers of Service Quarters | 63,000
| 61,000 |
Underleased from AHL | 53.000 (84%)
| 50,500 (83%) |
Percentage of total properties | 23%
| 23.5% |
Numbers of empty homes | (14,425)
| 14,352*) |
* See footnote at paragraph 2 above.
|
8.Part 1: Paragraph 1.15
|
Expenditure | FY 1998-99
| FY 1999-2000 |
AH rental | £110m
| £109m |
Works | £149m
| £158m |
Service Receipts | (£79m)
| (£79m)* |
Other Receipts | (£5m)
| (£5.5m) |
Net Expenditure | £175m
| £182.5m |
* FY 1998-99 figure for Service Receipts repeated for FY 1999-2000 on the assumption that the reduction in take up of married quarters was broadly matched by the annual recommended AFPRB increase in rents by Serviceman.
|
9.Part 1: Paragraph 1.16
|
Costs: (AHL rent plus maintenance) |
FY 1998-99 | FY 1999-2000
|
Empty homes | £39m
| £41m* |
Unavailable homes | £4m
| £4.2m* |
Numbers of empty homes | 14,425 (23%)
| 14,352 (23.5%)** |
Numbers of unavailable homes | 2,200 (4%)
| 2,162 (3.5%)** |
* Maintenance element of original data uprated by inflation, AHL rental revised to reflect FY 1999-2000 levels.
** See footnote at paragraph 2 above.
|
10.Part 1: Paragraph 1.18
|
Upgrade programme | FY 1998-99
| FY 1999-2000 |
Expenditure | £27m
| £47.9m |
Percentage of estate upgraded to Standard 1
| 9% | 18.7%
|
11.Part 2: Paragraph 2.9 and Figure 9
|
Age analysis of Routine Voids | Sept 1999
| Aug 2000 |
<3 months | 3,944
| 3,382 |
>12 months | 2,171
| 320 |
>3 years | 346
| 50 |
12.Part 2: Paragraph 2.14
|
Costs of oversupply | Sept 1999
| Aug 2000 |
Percentage quarters empty or unavailable |
26%* | 27%
|
AH average rental | £2,050
| £2,200 |
Average maintenance spent empty/unavailable houses
| £937 | £984**
|
Numbers of empty/unavailable | 16,629
| 16,514* |
Total cost of retained empty/unavailable |
£38m*** | £39.7m***
|
* See footnote at paragraph 2 above, see also paragraph 9 aboveThe Report's Paragraph 1.16 implies 27 per cent rather than figure of 26 per cent quoted here.
** Original figure uprated by inflation.
*** NAO calculation subtracts "other receipts" quoted in paragraph 3 above (Paragraph 1.15) from costs quoted in Paragraph 9 above (Paragraph 1.16). Hence (39+4)-5=38 and (41+4.2)-5.5=39.7.
|
13.Part 3: Paragraph 3.21
|
Substitute accommodation | FY1998-99
| FY1999-2000 |
Cost | £10.5m
| £9.8m |
Average numbers of properties used | 918
| 793 |
Average cost | £11,000
| £12,400 |
Average cost of quarter | £4,500
| £4,800 |
23 October 2000 |