Select Committee on Science and Technology Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence


Annex A

IPMS Analysis of Development Based on "SET Statistics 2000" and "Science Budget 2000"

  1.  The allocation of the Science Budget for 2001-02 to 2003-04 was announced on 22 November. The first part of this note set out the new allocations and analyses the implications for research in IPMS membership areas. The second part of the note provides some analysis of "SET Statistics 2000", also published in November. There is no Forward Look for 2000, so for SET expenditure outside the scope of the Science Budget analysis is necessarily retrospective.

SCIENCE BUDGET 2001-02 TO 2003-04

  2.  The Science Budget sets out the detailed allocation of the additional £725 million over the three years covered by the 2000 Spending Review (SR2000). As set out in the Science White Paper "Excellence and Opportunity" this comprises:

    —  £356 million for scientific research, of which 70 per cent is accounted for by cross-research council programmes in genomics, e-science and basic technology (see paragraph 5).

    —  £1 billion for investment in the infrastructure of the science and engineering base, part funded by the Wellcome Trust.

    —  A £140 million Higher Education Innovation Fund

    —  An increase in PhD student stipends from £6,800 in the current academic year to £9,000 in 2003-04.

    —  A programme of up to £4 million a year, jointly funded by the Wolfson Foundation and Royal Society, to assist the recruitment of up to 50 top researchers.

  3.  Table 1 sets out the Science Budget allocation in cash terms. It also shows the percentage increase in component parts of the Budget over the three year period. Figures for 2001-02 are not directly comparable with those previously published because of a change in accounting convention to Resource Accounting and Budgeting.

  4.  It is interesting to note that:

    —  Of the £1 billion allocation for infrastructure investment must £100 million—amounting to 10 per cent of the total funding— is allocated for modernisation of research council institutes and the development of large national science facilities (in 2002-03 and 2003-04). The remaining 90 per cent of the fund will be used for investment in universities.

    —  For infrastructure investment beyond this period, the Science Budget states that OST is developing a rolling ten year road-map for future large infrastructure projects taking into account developments in Europe and worldwide. The first version of this road-map will be completed this month and the Government intends to announce in January 2001 preliminary funding for projects to start development in the period 2001-02 to 2003-04. It is not clear whether the £68 million for capital expenditure yet to be allocated is for this purpose.

    —  There is a £20 million allocation for DIAMOND in each of the next three years. The Science Budget states that since the decision to allocate DIAMOND at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory was taken in March 2000" . . . planning for the project has been moving ahead rapidly. Management structures for the initial phase of the project are in place, supported by scientific and technical advisory committees, comprising both UK and international experts to advise on the detailed specification and design for DIAMOND. The project is now in a position to appoint key senior personnel and is setting up a search committee to identify both a Technical Director and Chief Executive for the DIAMOND Joint Venture Company . . . With the headline specification agreed, the detailed design activity is about to start, involving the secondment of key UK design expertise from CCLRC at Daresbury to the DIAMOND project team".

Table 1

ALLOCATION OF SCIENCE BUDGET 2001-02 TO 2003-04

£ million
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
% change to
2001-02 to
2003-04
MRC
349.614
371.930
387.151
+10.7
BBSRC
213.987
232.603
250.151
+16.9
NERC
192.865
205.414
216.750
+12.4
EPSRC
436.202
461.540
489.911
+12.3
PPARC
206.289
220.383
232.208
+12.6
ESRC
74.447
82.763
91.533
+23.0
CCLRC
7.421
8.113
9.952
+34.1
Research Councils' Pensions Schemes
26.970
28.450
29.740
+10.3
Royal Society
25.945
28.745
29.245
+12.7
Royal Academy of Engineering
4.270
4.770
5.270
+23.4
DIAMOND
20.000
20.000
20.000
 
Joint Infrastructure Fund
125.000
 
Science Research Investment Fund
125.000
250.000
 
Joint Research Equipment Initiative
10.000
10.000
10.000
 
Capital (not yet allocated)
34.000
34.000
 
Higher Education Innovation Fund
20.000
20.000
40.000
 
University Challenge
5.000
 
Science Enterprise Challenge
5.000
10.000
 
Exploitation of Discoveries at PSRES
10.000
 
Cambridge MIT Institute
14.000
14.000
14.000
 
Foresight Challenge
3.000
5.000
 
OST Initiatives
3.000
3.100
3.350
+11.7
OST Admin Costs
11.192
11.192
11.192
0
Exchange Rate and Contingency Reserve
15.264
15.464
16.014
+4.9
TOTAL
1,766.467
1,910,467
2,155.467
+22.0

Source: Budget 2001-02 to 2003-04.

    —  There is a £10 million allocation for exploitation of discoveries at PSREs in 2001-02, presumably in support of measures proposed in the Baker Report, but no funding allocation for later years. The Science Budget states only that "details of the operation of this fund are currently being developed."

CROSS-COUNCIL RESEARCH PROGRAMMES

  5.  As indicated above, there are three cross-council programmes: in genomics, e-science and basic technology. These have a total budget allocation of £252 million over the three years to 2003-04, of which £240 million is resource and £12 million capital. This breaks down as follows:

    —  £110 million for genomics, almost half of which is allocated to the MRC. BBSRC will get £33 million, NERC £6 million and EPSRC £13 million.

    —  £98 million for e-science, of which £41m is allocated to EPSRC for high performance computing, its core-science programme and applications in physical and engineering sciences. The next largest beneficiary is PPARC, which will receive £26m for applications in astronomy and particle physics—in particular the computing for the Large Hadron Collider at CERN, BBSRC will get £8 million, NERC £7 million, and CCLRC £5 million. The Science Budget states that "The Councils will set specific targets for the use of Basic Technology funds in agreement with OST, and will report annually on progress towards these targets. Councils may also receive some funds from other DTI budgets, and will have to agree targets for this additional money and account for this annually to the Department. In addition, EPSRC will receive ring-fenced resources for the core programme on behalf of all the Councils".

    —  £44 million for basic technology, £41 million of which will be held by EPSRC on behalf of all the research councils. Expenditure of this money will be supervised by a Basic Technology Panel covering the interests of all research councils, but with operational management undertaken by EPSRC.

ALLOCATIONS TO THE RESEARCH COUNCILS

  6.  Table 2 shows that the effects of SR2000 additions to baseline spending will mainly take effect from 2002. Increases in BBSRC, NERC, EPSRC and PPARC budgets for 2001-02 are all below the rate of inflation.

Table 2

SR2000 ADDITIONS TO BASELINE SPENDING (PER CENT CHANGES)

Research Council
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
  
per cent
per cent
per cent
BBSRC
1.97
10.83
19.2
NERC
0.5
7.04
12.95
EPSRC
2.58
8.54
15.2
PPARC
1.37
8.29
14.1
CCLRC
15.3
26.1
54.6


  Source: Science Budget 2001-02 to 2003-04.

  7.  In relation to the specific allocations, the Science Budget states that:

  BBSRC—Areas of strategic importance include spongiform encephalopathies and genomics research. BBSRC objectives include ensuring that the wider life science community benefits from co-ordinated genomics facilities established by BBSRC and enhancing the strategic development of the bioscience base. There is a capital allocation of £5 million in 2002-03 and 2003-04 for "new and upgraded laboratories and facilities in its Institutes".

  NERC—"NERC is developing a five to ten year vision, which includes making its Research Centres fit for purpose and more focused in their delivery of long-term core science in priority areas. This requires reassessing the ratio of the Science Budget to external funding, reducing capital liabilities and infrastructure costs, and facilitating strategic partnerships with other bodies". In fact there is a small decrease (£0.03m) in the funding allocation for NERC programmes and PhD stipends in 2001-02 and among its objectives are "further progress on the rationalisation and restructuring programme to improve scientific capability and collaboration whilst reducing Council's liabilities, by the end of 2003". Three new priorities for research are identified: rapid climate change in NW Europe; virtual centre for atmospheric sciences; and sustainable technology". Like BBSRC, NERC will receive £5 million in 2002-03 and 2003-04 to invest in buildings and equipment for its research centres.

  EPSRC—Most of the increase in the EPSRC budget is to fund its contribution to the cross-council research programmes. It will be expected to manage the e-science and basic technology programmes on behalf of all the research councils. The work on e-science will be supported by £9 million of capital investment. Other objectives include encouraging scientists and engineers from a range of disciplines to address problems in life sciences and promoting collaboration between physical and life sciences.

  PPARC—PPARC is expected to pay the UK subscription to CERN and a large part of the subscription to the European Space Agency. It will also negotiate entry to the European Southern Observatory but this will require "major savings" from PPARC's current budget. Thus there is a planned decrease in expenditure in 2001-02 of £0.217 million and no provision at all for additional capital expenditure over the next three years.

  CCLRC—The majority of additional funding for CCLRC is for the e-science cross-council programme. There is also provision for £1.2 million to fund projects to enhance existing facilities and to establish technology centres devoted to accelerator R&D and research into instrumentation. However, in 2001-02 there will be a decrease in planned expenditure on existing programmes of £0.015 million. The objectives set for CCLRC include assisting OST in the implementation phase of the Quinquennial Review.

8.  SET STATISTICS 2000

  9.  Table 3 overleaf shows the trend in net government expenditure on SET in real terms since 1989-90. It confirms the major decline in departmental expenditure on SET over the last ten years. It also shows that there will be a real increase in expenditure next year but that for defence this will not be sustained for the following year.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2001
Prepared 3 April 2001