International Criminal Court Bill [Lords]
|
Mr. Battle: The hon. and learned Gentleman should be clear that reservations are not allowed and have not been made. France and New Zealand have made what are called ``interpreted statements'', which are not reservations because they do not change the statute in respect of those countries. There is a difference between ``reservation'' and ``interpretation'' and that is what France and New Zealand have exercised. Mr. Garnier: I note what the Minister says. That is the stance that the Government adopted in the other place. It being One o'clock, The Chairman adjourned the Committee without Question put, pursuant to the Standing Order.
Cook, Mr. Frank (Chairman) Battle, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Browne, Mr. Cranston, Mr. Day, Mr. Ellman, Mrs. Fitzsimons, Lorna Gapes, Mr. Garnier, Mr. Gillan, Mrs. Hendrick, Mr. Howarth, Mr. Gerald King, Ms Oona Lammy, Mr. Maclennan, Mr. McNulty, Mr. Naysmith, Dr. Worthington, Mr.
|
![]() ![]() | |
©Parliamentary copyright 2001 | Prepared 1 May 2001 |