Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
Mr. Swayne: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, (1) pursuant to his answer of 12 December 2001, Official Report, column 861W, on prisoners of war in the Far East, if he will state the assumptions on which budgetary provision was made for his ex-gratia payment scheme for former British civilian internees of the Japanese; [23768]
Dr. Moonie: When the scheme was announced on 7 November 2000, Official Report, columns 15970W, I advised the House that it was estimated that up to 16,700 people might be eligible for the ex-gratia payment for
18 Dec 2001 : Column: 178W
former Far East prisoners. This figure was the best estimate available and was based on an assessment of the numbers of those who had been held captive in each of the groups covered by the scheme and of the likely number of surviving members of those groups or surviving spouses where the former prisoner had subsequently died. The data were gathered from official records and from the associations representing former Far East prisoners. The estimate made for the number of surviving civilian internees and surviving spouses of deceased internees was 3,700 based on data provided by the Association of British Civilian InterneesFar East Region.
I am withholding the further detail requested under Exemption 2 of the Code of Practice on Access to Government Information.
Mr. Salter: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will establish an inquiry into the suspension of private contractors working at the Atomic Weapons Establishment, Aldermaston, following a police investigation and drug-testing among those working on the decommissioning of nuclear warheads. [23394]
Dr. Moonie: Safety at the Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE), Aldermaston is paramount, and we are confident that it has not been compromised by the incident to which my hon. Friend refers. The decommissioning activities in this case related not to nuclear weapons, but to a redundant building. None the less, work was halted pending the outcome of a Ministry of Defence police investigation into allegations relating to drugs. This is now complete. No drugs were found during searches and no evidence emerged to support either further investigation or legal proceedings. AWE plc expect to resume the decommissioning shortly.
Mr. Andrew Turner: To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland how many employees of (a) her Department and (b) agencies sponsored by her Department work in (i) London, (ii) areas benefiting from EU Objective 1 status, (iii) areas with Objective 2 status and (iv) other areas. [16115]
Mrs. Liddell [holding answer 19 November 2001]: My Department employs 30 staff in London, 32 staff in an EU Objective 2 status area and 52 in other areas. No staff work in an EU Objective 1 area.
Mr. Andrew Turner: To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland (1) if she will list those public bodies which are the responsibility of her Department and which are not listed in Public Bodies 2000; [17604]
Mrs. Liddell: Public Bodies 2000 sets out information on non-departmental public bodies (NDPBs), certain public corporations (including nationalised industries) and NHS
18 Dec 2001 : Column: 179W
bodies. There are four types of NDPB: executive NDPBs; advisory NDPBs; tribunal NDPBs; and boards of visitors to penal establishments. The next edition will be published around the end of the year. Information about task forces, annual reports and ad hoc advisory groups is set out in an annual report, published by the Cabinet Office. Copies of Public Bodies 2000 are in the Library of the House and this publication may be accessed via Cabinet Office's website (http://www.official-documents.co.uk/document/caboff/ pb00/pb00.htm). Copies of the annual report on task forces and similar bodies have also been placed in the Library of the House and the annual report is being made available on Cabinet Office's website.
The only public body for which my Department has responsibility is the Boundary Commission for Scotland, details of which are in Public Bodies 2000.
Mr. Rosindell: To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what plans she has to propose legislation to permit the Scottish Parliament to amend the abortion law in Scotland. [22879]
Mr. Russell Brown: To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland, pursuant to her answer of 6 November 2001, Official Report, column 91, to my hon. Friend the Member for Glasgow, Anniesland (John Robertson), when she plans to launch her consultation exercise on the size of the Scottish Parliament. [24542]
Mrs. Liddell: I have today issued the document "The size of the Scottish Parliamenta consultation". Copies will be placed in the Libraries of both Houses and are being sent to all MPs representing Scottish constituencies and Members of the Scottish Parliament. Views are sought on the case for retaining or ending the linking of Westminster and Holyrood constituency boundaries as provided in the Scotland Act 1998, in the light of the experience now gained of the Scottish Parliament. I am inviting responses by 29 March 2002.
Mr. Steinberg: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (1) what his estimate is of the money owed to parents by absentee parents in the City of Durham; [13606]
(3) how many cases in the Durham area have been dealt with by the CSA since it was established. [13609]
Malcolm Wicks: The administration of the Child Support Agency is a matter for the Chief Executive, Mr. Doug Smith. He will write to my hon. Friend.
18 Dec 2001 : Column: 180W
Letter from Doug Smith to Mr. Gerry Steinberg, dated 12 December 2001:
Mr. Todd: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions if he will set out an action plan to address the concerns expressed by the Comptroller and Auditor General in qualifying the 200001 accounts of the Child Support Agency. [15244]
Malcolm Wicks: The administration of the Child Support Agency is a matter for the Chief Executive, Mr. Doug Smith. He will write to my hon. Friend.
Letter from Doug Smith to Mr. Mark Todd, dated 12 December 2001:
Mr. Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions if he will make a statement on the cost in (a) 19992000 and (b) 200001 of compensation payments for maladministration by the CSA. [18994]
Malcolm Wicks: The administration of the Child Support Agency is a matter for the Chief Executive, Mr. Doug Smith. He will write to the hon. Member.
Letter from Doug Smith to Mr. John Bercow, dated 17 December 2001:
18 Dec 2001 : Column: 181W
Mr. Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what the performance target was for the CSA to reduce its outstanding work by 31 March; and if it was achieved. [19125]
Malcolm Wicks: The administration of the Child Support Agency is a matter for the Chief Executive, Mr. Doug Smith. He will write to the hon. Member.
Letter from Doug Smith to Mr. John Bercow, dated 12 December 2001:
Outstanding work | Target | Performance |
---|---|---|
Pre-maintenance assessment | 18 | 30.5 |
Revisions, supersessions and case checks | 6.2 | 10.8 |
Account advice | 4 | 5 |
Interim maintenance assessment | 49 | 276.0 |
Account maintenance | 1.4 | 1.5 |
Debt management | 12 | 20.1 |
Enforcement | 30 | 46.7 |
Mr. Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions if the CSA met its performance target in 200001 for the accuracy of the cash value of all assessments. [19124]
Malcolm Wicks: The administration of the Child Support Agency is a matter for the Chief Executive, Mr. Doug Smith. He will write to the hon. Member.
18 Dec 2001 : Column: 182W
Letter from Doug Smith to Mr. John Bercow, dated 12 December 2001:
Next Section | Index | Home Page |