|Previous Section||Index||Home Page|
Mr. Blunkett [holding answer 22 January 2002]: I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave to my hon. Friend the Member for Great Grimsby (Mr. Mitchell) on 17 January 2002, Official Report, column 469W.
Beverley Hughes [holding answer 22 January 2002]: Her Majesty's Prison Service collects data on sickness levels and ethnic identity on its own employees. These details are not collected in respect of staff employed at private sector prisons as a matter of course because personnel issues are the concern of the contractors and such information is therefore not contractually required. The information is however, made available on request.
Norman Baker: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department for what reason the request by the Advisory Council on Public Records to be allowed to consider the conditions under which MI5 records are released was refused; and if he will make a statement. 
Mr. Blunkett [holding answer 22 January 2002]: In July 1998, my right hon. Friend the then Home Secretary, invited the Advisory Council on Public records to review the criteria employed by the Security Service to select files for permanent preservation on grounds of historical interest. During the course of the review the chairman of the Council, Lord Justice Woolf, wrote to the Home Secretary to ask whether he wished to extend the terms of reference to encompass issues relating to access to Security Service records.
The intelligence services and the Interception Commissioners and Investigatory Powers Tribunal have full access to all service records necessary for their functions and therefore the Home Secretary replied that
23 Jan 2002 : Column 936W
he was not contemplating changing the arrangements to widen access beyond this "need to know" approach. This was recognised in Lord Justice Woolf's report. However, the Home Secretary did agree that officials of the Public Records Office, with the necessary security clearance, should be invited by the Security Service to examine files earmarked for destruction after review by the service. This now happens.
The Advisory Council reported in December 1998 and the report was placed in Library on 3 February 1999. At the same time the then Home Secretary announced that he was accepting in full the recommendations of the committee. All of these have now been implemented.
Mr. Blunt: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what costs have been incurred by his Department to date in connection with the Saville inquiry; and what his estimate is of the final cost to his Department. 
Mr. Blunkett [holding answer 22 January 2002]: The Home Office has responsibility for the protective security arrangements for public figures, for which some costs have been incurred in relation to this inquiry. It is not our policy to comment on the details of protection arrangements for individuals, as to do so could compromise their security.
Mr. Blunkett [holding answer 22 January 2002]: The Department conducts or commissions market or opinion research only when it is justified by the specific needs of a particular policy or programme, and when this is the most economical, efficient and effective way to achieve the purpose.
Detailed breakdowns of costs and analysis by types of research, such as polling exercises and focus groups, are not held centrally or captured by the Department's accounting systems. Data are recorded under broad expenditure headings, further disaggregation would be possible only at disproportionate cost.
Mr. Keith Bradley [holding answer 22 January 2002]: The Magistrates Court Witness Service is being established and run by the organisation Victim Support, with funding from the Home Office. As at 14 January 2002, witness services had been established in 220 (58 per cent.) of the 382 magistrates courts in England
23 Jan 2002 : Column 937W
and Wales. Victim Support advise that the process of recruiting staff and volunteers for the remaining 162 courts is in progress, and that they are hopeful of meeting the target of establishing witness support services in all magistrates courts by 31 March 2002.
Mr. Grieve: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will make a statement on the operation of the duty on the Probation Service to keep victims of serious violent and sexual crimes informed of the offender's release. 
Beverley Hughes [holding answer 22 January 2002]: Under the new statutory duty, local Probation Boards are required to consult and notify victims about release arrangements of offenders serving a sentence of 12 months or more for a sexual or violent offence. We expect approximately 3,500 more victims of serious crimes each year will be informed of an offender's release under these arrangements. There are currently no figures collected centrally on the actual numbers of victims notified of offenders' release arrangements since the legislation came into force on 1 April 2001.
Mr. Grieve: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department in what percentage of prosecutions the victim chose to make a personal statement to the court in each of the last three years; and if he will make a statement. 
Simon Hughes: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many asylum seekers received advice or assistance from each of the reception assistance agencies in relation to their application to the National Asylum Support Service in (a) 200001 and (b) the current financial year to date. 
Angela Eagle: Voluntary sector agencies are grant funded by the Home Office to assist asylum seekers who need to make an application for support. The number of asylum seekers assisted by reception assistants from individual agencies is as follows:
|3 April 2000 to 31 March 2001(13)||1 April 2001 to 31 December 2001(14)|
|Refugee Arrivals Project||5,554||4,337|
|Scottish Refugee Council||504||425|
|Welsh Refugee Council||150||164|
(13) based on information provided by the voluntary sector agencies
Simon Hughes: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will provide a breakdown of the amount of grant made to each of the reception assistance agencies by the National Asylum Support
23 Jan 2002 : Column 938W
Service under section 111 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 in (a) 200001 and (b) the current financial year to date. 
|Refugee Arrivals Project||1,913,000||1,971,000|
|Scottish Refugee Council||595,000||743,000|
|Welsh Refugee Council||343,000||200,000|
(15) Information based on outturn figure.
(16) Information based on estimate of outturn figure.
(17) Excludes payments for provision of emergency accommodation.
Simon Hughes: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the total cost was of providing (a) accommodation and (b) emergency accommodation under the National Asylum Support Service-run asylum support system in (i) 200001 and (ii) in the current financial year to date. 
Angela Eagle: The total cost of (a) accommodation paid for directly under contract by the National Asylum Support Service (NASS) for (i) 200001 was £54.1 million and for (ii) current year to 30 November £150.1 million, and (b) emergency accommodation for (i) 200001 was £27.5 million and for (ii) current year to 30 November £38.2 million.
|Next Section||Index||Home Page|