Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
Mr. Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if she will make a statement on progress with her Department's action plan to address (a) the relevant elements of the Modernising Government White Paper and (b) the more detailed proposals for Civil Service reform. [24769]
Mrs. Liddell: The Department is continuing to address the various components of the Modernising Government programme and civil service reform in conjunction with the Cabinet Office and the Scottish Executive.
Mr. Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what proportion of the Department's budget in each of the last four years was not spent in the year for which it was allocated. [24774]
Mrs. Liddell: The Scotland Office was established in its present form on 1 July 1999. In 19992000 the Department spent 96.1 per cent. of its budget and in 200001 it spent 95.9 per cent.
Mr. Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if she will make a statement on the change in costs resulting from her Department's IT strategy. [24767]
Mrs. Liddell: The Department's information systems are kept under review by staff as part of their normal duties. Any changes in costs in the current year are expected to be small: the costs of any future changes are not yet known.
Mr. Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if she will make a statement on the reasons for the extent of the change in the costs of depreciation and capital charges from 19992000 to 200001. [24765]
Mrs. Liddell: The Scotland Office was established in its present form on 1 July 1999. The figures for depreciation and capital charges for 19992000 are therefore for a nine month period.
For my Department, the cost of capital arises mainly from the occupancy of Dover House in Whitehall. The building was professionally revalued on 31 March 1999 and, under current accounting procedures, is due to have
7 Feb 2002 : Column 1120W
a professional revaluation every five years. Depreciation of other assets is by equal instalments over their estimated useful life.
Mr. Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if she will make a statement on the administration costs to her Department in (a) 200001 and (b) 200102. [24772]
Mrs. Liddell: The running costs provision of the Scotland Office was unchanged between 200001 and 200102. The Department took additional provision of £334,000 in 200102 to meet the cost of electoral publicity associated with the 2001 General Election. The provision for the Parliamentary Boundary Commission for Scotland rose from £170,000 in 200001 to £300,000 in 200102 as the Commission began work on the 5th review of parliamentary constituencies in Scotland.
Mr. Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if she will make a statement on the financial implications for her office of its participation in the Whole of Government accounts project. [24773]
Mrs. Liddell: Work on the Whole of Government accounts project will be undertaken by staff as part of their normal duties and I expect any additional costs to be small.
Mr. Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if she will make a statement on the reasons for the extent of the change in the operating costs of the Department from 19992000 to 200001. [24766]
Mrs. Liddell: The Scotland Office was established in its present form on 1 July 1999. The operating costs of the Department for 19992000 were for a nine month period.
Mr. Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland (1) in what proportion of cases the Department has paid accounts within 30 days of receipt of a valid invoice in 2001; [24778]
Mrs. Liddell: In 19992000 my Department paid 98.4 per cent. of its accounts within 30 days. In 200001 the figure was 99.33 per cent.
Mr. Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if the target to provide any readily available free published information within five working days of receipt of a request applies to anything other than the Department's Service Delivery Agreement. [24781]
7 Feb 2002 : Column 1121W
Mr. Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if she will make a statement on the efficiency savings declared by her Department in (a) 200001 and (b) 200102. [24771]
Mrs. Liddell: The Scotland Office was established in its present form on 1 July 1999. The financial provision for 200001 and 200102 was set at a constant level and the Department will absorb any inflationary pressures from within its budget.
Mr. Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland if she will make a statement on progress with the consolidation of financial and management information systems referred to on page 16 of the 2001 departmental report. [24768]
Mrs. Liddell: Progress with consolidation of the Department's financial and management information systems is continuing.
Mr. Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what proportion of the increased public expenditure in Scotland between now and 200304 is expected to be accounted for by staff costs. [24775]
Mrs. Liddell: Public expenditure on staff costs is a matter for the relevant bodies or departments operating in Scotland. The proportion of staff costs to other expenditure by the Scotland Office is expected to remain broadly unchanged.
Mr. Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what discussions she has had with members of the Scottish Executive about the resource implications of the (a) bilateral and (b) multilateral concordats agreed with UK Government Departments. [24776]
Mrs. Liddell: The Memorandum of Understanding and supplementary texts are agreements between the Government and the devolved Administrations on how they intend conducting relations between the Administrations. The Memorandum of Understanding reflects best practice on issues such as co-operation, exchange of information, correspondence and parliamentary business. Supplementary texts add more detail for the international and EU fields, statistics and financial assistance to industry.
A revised version of the Memorandum of Understanding was published on 18 December 2001 as Command Paper 5240. Three hundred copies were printed, at a cost of £3,851. These costs were met from the Cabinet Office budget. The main distribution medium will be via the Cabinet Office's website: www.cabinet-office.gov.uk.
Mr. Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland (1) if she will make a statement on the cost to public funds of the implementation of the Scotland Act 1998 (Modifications of Schedule 5) Order 2000; [24784]
7 Feb 2002 : Column 1122W
(3) if she will make a statement on the cost to public funds of the Scotland Act 1998 (Consequential Modifications) Order 2000; [24787]
(4) if she will make a statement on the cost to public funds of the implementation of the Scotland Act 1998 (Cross-Border Public Authorities) (British Wool Marketing Board) Order 2000; [24791]
(5) if she will make a statement on the cost to public funds of the implementation of the Scotland Act 1998 (Cross-Border Public Authorities) (Adaptation of Functions etc.) Order 2000; [24792]
(6) if she will make a statement on the cost to public funds of the implementation of the Scotland Act 1998 (Cross-Border Public Authorities) (Adaptation of Functions etc.) (No. 2) Order 2000; [24785]
(7) if she will make a statement on the cost to public funds of the implementation of the Scotland Act 1998 (Modification of Functions) Order 2000; [24790]
(8) if she will make a statement on the cost to public funds of the implementation of the Scotland Act 1998 (Transfer of Functions to the Scottish Ministers etc.) (No. 2) Order 2000; [24783]
(9) if she will make a statement on the cost to public funds of the implementation of the Scotland Act 1998 (Modifications of Schedule 4) Order 2000; [24788]
(10) if she will make a statement on the cost to public funds of the implementation of the Scotland Act 1998 (Transfer of Functions to the Scottish Ministers etc.) Order 2000; [24789]
(11) if she will make a statement on the cost to public funds of the Scotland Act 1998 (Agency Arrangements) (Specification) (No. 2) Order 2000; [24786]
Mrs. Liddell: There is no separately identifiable cost to public funds for the implementation of any of these orders, but I would expect it to be minimal in each case.
Next Section | Index | Home Page |