Previous Section Index Home Page


DEFENCE

Overseas Military Personnel

Mr. Simon Thomas: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence from which overseas countries military personnel were trained in the United Kingdom in (a) 2000 and (b) 2001; and if he will indicate in each case how many personnel were trained. [39517]

Mr. Ingram: During 2000, a total of 3,504 overseas military personnel from 106 countries were trained at UK military establishments. In 2001, 3,731 military

1 Mar 2002 : Column 1648W

personnel were trained from 101 countries. A full breakdown of the numbers trained, by country, is as follows:

Overseas military personnel trained in the UK during 2000 and 2001

Country1 January to 31 December 20001 January to 31 December 2001
Albania715
Algeria2
Antigua and Barbuda1
Argentina 613
Australia84100
Austria514
Azerbaijan1
Bahamas22
Bahrain2930
Bangladesh22
Barbados21
Belgium8287
Belize2025
Bermuda1414
Botswana514
Brazil2017
Brunei152177
Bulgaria56
Canada273322
Chile45
China1332
Croatia410
Czech Republic2927
Denmark3527
Ecuador1
Egypt616
El Salvador31
Estonia86
Fiji32
Finland611
France6759
Gambia11
Georgia75
Germany115130
Ghana38
Greece2549
Guatemala55
Guyana23
Honduras1
Hong Kong74
Hungary1728
India1815
Ireland2756
Israel4316
Italy119154
Jamaica2241
Japan89
Jordan9667
Kazakhstan1
Kenya58
Korea (South)910
Kuwait311307
Latvia1214
Lebanon59
Lithuania118
Luxembourg1
Macedonia814
Malawi56
Malaysia2722
Maldives1
Malta62
Mauritius4
Moldova12
Morocco66
Mozambique5
Namibia1
Nepal1431
Netherlands283253
New Zealand4433
Nicaragua1
Nigeria2728
Norway247205
Oman186178
Pakistan3649
Papua New Guinea1
Paraguay22
Philippines610
Poland2825
Portugal3334
Qatar5366
Romania1619
Russia510
Rwanda2
Saudi Arabia4763
Senegal1517
Seychelles1
Sierra Leone322
Singapore131113
Slovak Republic1619
Slovenia48
South Africa2819
Spain1722
Sri Lanka707
St. Kitts and Nevis1
St. Lucia1
St. Vincent12
Swaziland11
Sweden2427
Switzerland411
Syria1
Tajikistan1
Tanzania68
Thailand2927
Tonga14
Trinidad and Tobago23
Turkey5056
Uganda23
Ukraine2639
United Arab Emirates8395
United States of America126163
Uruguay84
Yemen26
Zimbabwe62
Total students3,5043,731
Total countries106101

1 Mar 2002 : Column 1649W

Service Law

Mr. Jenkin: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on the Case of Morris v. the United Kingdom; and what plans he has to bring forward legislation to make changes to service law in response to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights. [39687]

Mr. Ingram: The European Court of Human Rights delivered its judgment in the case of Morris v. the United Kingdom on 26 February. The court noted that the changes to the court martial system made by the Armed Forces Act 1996 have gone a long way to meeting the concerns expressed in the Findlay case. However, it found that there had been a violation of article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which concerns the right to a fair hearing, as regards some aspects of Mr. Morris's trial by court martial in 1997.

1 Mar 2002 : Column 1650W

The court was concerned about the potential for undue external influence over certain members of the court martial panel; and about the procedures for involving non-judicial authorities in the review of court martial findings and sentences. We are assessing the implications of the court's judgment for the future conduct of courts martial and whether any changes that may be necessary require the legislation to be amended. Army and Royal Air Force courts martial that are imminently scheduled are being postponed, but for the time being trials in the Royal Navy are continuing in view of the nature of the regulations in that service concerning the position of court martial members.

I shall make an announcement as soon as our assessment of the implications of the judgment has been completed. However, we do not consider that the judgment fundamentally affects the court martial system, which we intend to retain as an effective and fair means of administering discipline and justice in our armed forces.

Royal Navy (Pay Banding)

Mr. Hancock: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will ensure that the Royal Navy does not impose a two tier system of high and low pay banding based on Pay 2000 JE for the Rating Corp; and if he will make a statement. [38289]

Mr. Ingram: A two tier system of high and low pay ranges was introduced for Royal Navy ratings (and also for soldiers and airmen) with effect from 1 April 2001 as part of Pay 2000, the new pay structure for the armed forces. Job Evaluation underpins the allocation of trades to one of the two pay ranges. Pay 2000 was devised in close collaboration with the single services and was the subject of a high profile and extensive communications programme throughout the armed forces.

HMS Sheffield

Mr. Jenkin: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence when HMS Sheffield will be withdrawn from service. [38951]

Mr. Ingram: On current plans HMS Sheffield will be withdrawn from service towards the end of this decade. In the shorter term she will be reduced to a low readiness state, commensurate with force levels endorsed within the Strategic Defence Review, from November 2002 until September 2004.

HMS Exeter

Mr. Jenkin: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if HMS Exeter breached the Harmony guidelines following her deployments last year. [38945]

Mr. Ingram: HMS Exeter has not breached the Harmony guidelines. She has been deployed for a total of 12 months in the past three years and has spent 48 per cent. of her time in her base port of Portsmouth during the last two years. Harmony guidelines state that ships should spend a minimum of 40 per cent. of their time in their base port over a two-year period, and that total deployed time over a three-year period should not exceed 18 months.