Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
Lady Hermon: The Minister makes a good point, in that an offence attracting a sentence of imprisonment, whether suspended or not, is clearly serious; but we are talking about people who are responsible for the administration and carrying out of criminal justice functions.
We have a criminal justice review, whose aims were stated in the Belfast agreement. One of those aims was the production of a criminal justice scheme that had
Mr. Browne: Let me first deal with the points made by the hon. Member for North Down (Lady Hermon).
The purpose of amendment No. 112 is to describe the functions of justices of the peace that are being transferred to lay magistrates. That transfer was always intended. It was recommended by the review, and it is what the Bill seeks to achieve. The amendment's aim is simply to set the functions in statute, rather than to confer more powers on anyone, in terms of judicial functions, than was always intended and made clear in the Bill. These functions have never been set out before.
Both in Committee and today, the hon. Lady and I have discussed her attempts to include in the Bill a number of counsels of perfection in relation to behaviour.
Our debates have been energetic, and the hon. Lady has pursued them consistently and appropriately, but I think I have dealt with the issues that she has raised. She seeks to create circumstances in which I think it would be almost impossible to persuade anyone to take on the job of lay magistrate. If people were to be automatically removed from the job after being convicted of careless driving, with all the attendant publicity, it would surely be difficult for them to accept the post.I accept that certain types of offence should exclude people, and the Bill reflects that. In other circumstances, however, there must be a degree of flexibility. People can accumulate criminal records and convictions for comparatively minor behaviour. We drive motor vehicles; we have a statutory structure, built up over the years, to protect people, but also to generate circumstances in which such matters as insurance can be resolved.
I cannot put the arguments to the hon. Lady better than I have already. I know that they disappoint her, but I do not think that it would work if any minor offence automatically barred people from such a position or removed them from it, particularly when judges higher up the judicial ladder, carrying out functions that were far more important and onerous, could have committed just such an offence.
I turn finally to the points made by the hon. Member for Reigate (Mr. Blunt). The reason for my puzzlement in this very technical area is that I accept that sometimes it takes more than one saying to get the point across. It must have been my fault, but I did not at first understand the hon. Gentleman's point. It was not that I did not know the answerI did not even know whether I knew the answer as I did not understand the point. However, I think that I have encapsulated his first point in my head and that I understand the answer.
The hon. Gentleman wanted to know why the provisions in paragraph 41 of schedule 3 are not in the body of the Bill. As he rightly identified, the provisions are intended to enable the necessary changes to be made when devolution takes place. They could have been put in the main part of the Bill but if they had been, they would have to be capable of being read in two different wayspre and post-devolution. Alternatively, they could have been implemented under an order under section 86 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998, as we have discussed before. On this occasion, however, the draftsman chose to incorporate these provisions under paragraph 41 of schedule 3, which will become effective post-devolution.
The hon. Gentleman's other substantive question was who could dismiss the judicial office holders post- devolution. It would be the First Minister and Deputy First Minister.
Mr. Blunt: I am grateful to the Minister for that explanation. Will he address amendments Nos. 31 and 32 about the need for lay magistrates to be trained before they are appointed?
Mr. Browne: I am afraid that this comes down to the old flexibility argument again. It is difficult to predict at this stage exactly what the demand will be for lay magistrates. If they are to be trained, we might not be able to train them all at the same time. We need a degree of flexibility.
I accept the merit in the hon. Gentleman's argument and I hope that once the original difficulties are seen through and the change takes place, the norm will be that
people will not exercise this function until they have been trained to do so. However, I cannot guarantee, in all situations, that the demand for lay magistracy and magistrates courts hearings will be such that they can be serviced in a transitional period, and flexibility will be required. I take on board what the hon. Gentleman says and will bear it in mind. We have been able to do something about a situation when we looked at the figures in more detail on previous occasions and I will consider whether that is possible in this respect.Amendments made: No. 107, in page 82, line 24, at end insert
'(4) In subsection (5), for "Lord Chancellor otherwise determines" substitute "First Minister and deputy First Minister, acting jointly, otherwise determine".
(5) In subsection (11)
(a) for "Lord Chancellor" substitute "First Minister and deputy First Minister", and
(b) for "he may" substitute "they may jointly".'.
No. 108, in page 82, line 25, leave out from beginning to "(within" in line 27 and insert
'(1) Section 89 is amended as follows.
(2) After subsection (1) insert
"(1A) An order under section 10(4) shall be subject to affirmative resolution".'.
No. 109, in page 82, line 28, at end insert
'(3) In subsection (3), omit "10(4) or".'.[Mr. Browne.]
Amendment made: No. 110, in page 7, line 24, leave out Clause 9.[Mr. Browne.]
Amendment made: No. 111, in page 8, line 43, at end insert
'(11A) The Lord Chief Justice, Lords Justices of Appeal, judges of the High Court and county court judges may exercise any function of a lay magistrate (in relation to any matter arising within any county court division).'.[Mr. Browne.]
Amendments made: No. 112, in page 9, line 10, leave out from "from" to end of line 14 and insert
'a function to which subsection (2A) applies.
(2A) This subsection applies to
(a) any function of issuing a warrant or summons,
(b) any function of remanding an accused who has not previously been remanded for the offence,
(c) any function of ordering a person to enter into a recognisance to keep the peace or to be of good behaviour,
(d) the function of committal under section 21 of the Treatment of Offenders Act (Northern Ireland) 1968 (c. 29 (N.I.)) (offence during suspended sentence etc.),
(e) the function of committal under Article 5 of the Treatment of Offenders (Northern Ireland) Order 1976 (S.I. 1976/226 (N.I. 4)) (offence after early discharge),
4 Mar 2002 : Column 76
4 Mar 2002 : Column 77
Amendments made: No. 14, in page 86, line 26, leave out "District Judges (Magistrates" Courts)" and insert "Resident Magistrates".
No. 131, in page 87, line 20, at end insert
'10A In section 75(2)(b) (directions conferring or imposing functions on Official Solicitor), for "Lord Chancellor" substitute "Lord Chief Justice".'.[Mr. Browne.]
Amendments made: No. 15, in page 10, line 30, leave out "District Judges (Magistrates" Courts)" and insert "Resident Magistrates".
No. 132, in page 10, line 31, leave out
'District Judge (Magistrates' Courts) in Northern Ireland'
and insert "resident magistrate".
No. 133, in page 10, line 32, leave out from "other" to end of line 33 and insert
'resident magistrates and the deputy resident magistrates.'.
No. 134, in page 10, line 34, leave out
'District Judge (Magistrates' Courts) in Northern Ireland'
and insert "resident magistrate".
No. 135, in page 10, line 37, leave out
'District Judge (Magistrates' Courts) in Northern Ireland'
and insert "resident magistrate".
No. 136, in page 10, line 38, leave out from "a" to "pending" in line 40 and insert
'resident magistrate to act as Presiding resident magistrate,'.
No. 137, in page 11, line 2, leave out
'District Judge (Magistrates' Courts) in Northern Ireland'
and insert "resident magistrate".[Mr. Browne.]
Amendment made: No. 24, in page 12, line 34, leave out "District Judge (Magistrates" Courts)" and insert "Resident Magistrate".[Mr. Browne.]
Mr. Quentin Davies (Grantham and Stamford): I beg to move amendment No. 45, in page 13, line 22, leave out from "either" to end of line 34 and insert
Next Section
| Index | Home Page |