Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
Mr. Sanders: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how much of the proposed funding for diabetes care outlined in the interim Wanless report is earmarked for (a) eye screening and (b) eye complications associated with diabetes and if he will make a statement. [22767R]
4 Mar 2002 : Column 121W
Jacqui Smith: I refer the hon. Member to the reply I gave to him on 17 December 2001, Official Report, column 169W.
Mr. Horam: To ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will increase Government funding for children's hospices. [31309]
Yvette Cooper [holding answer 1 February 2002]: Children's hospices have access to national health service funding, the level of which must be agreed by health authorities and primary care trusts following assessment of local options available to support children with life threatening illnesses, and their families. In addition children's hospices will be eligible to apply for funding from the New Opportunity Fund's children's palliative care grant programme later this year that will make available an additional £48 million for children's paediatric care.
Mr. John Taylor: To ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will repeat the pledge made by the then Health Minister on 3 March 1997 concerning Solihull Hospital and the services to be provided there. [32260]
Yvette Cooper [holding answer 5 February 2002]: Decisions about services at Solihull hospital are a matter first for local consideration. Any proposals for significant changes to services anywhere in the national health service require formal consultation, and where local agreement is not reached, matters are referred to Ministers. No such proposals for consultation have been received for Solihull hospital.
Mr. Gordon Prentice: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what discussions he has had with Lancashire county council concerning the impact on the NHS of its proposals to reduce the numbers of residential homes for the elderly. [34570]
Jacqui Smith: The Social Services Inspectorate is following closely the work that Lancashire county council is undertaking to assess its current care provision, in particular the consultation with the national health service, local people and other interested parties about future strategies.
Joan Ruddock: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what advice is given by his Department to pregnant women about reducing their exposure to pesticide residues in food. [36087]
Yvette Cooper: My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State is advised on the issue of pesticides by the Food Standards Agency (FSA). The FSA has provided the following reply in consultation with the Pesticides Safety Directorate (an executive agency of the Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA)).
When considering the approval of a pesticide the independent Advisory Committee on Pesticides refers to a large dossier of information and studies carried out on
4 Mar 2002 : Column 122W
the pesticide. The dossier has information on toxicology of the pesticide, including specific studies to address the reproductive toxicity of the pesticide and crop residues data. Only those pesticides which demonstrate an acceptable risk to all groups of consumers (including pregnant women) can be approved.
The findings from the 2000 pesticide residues monitoring programme indicates that standards are being maintained at levels that the FSA believes provide a high level of consumer protection and confidence.
Thus, the FSA believes it is not necessary to issue specific advice to pregnant women on this issue as the regulatory process fully takes the risks to this consumer group into consideration.
Mr. Caton: To ask the Secretary of State for Health at what locations in the UK cockles have tested positive for diarrhetic shellfish poisoning when other shellfish have tested negative. [37096]
Yvette Cooper: There have been six locations where cockles have tested positive for diarrhetic shellfish poisoning while other shellfish sampled on the same day have tested negative. These are the Thames Estuary, the Wash, Whitstable, the Menai Straight, the Burry Inlet and Strangford Lough.
Mr. Caton: To ask the Secretary of State for Health when the highly toxic form of diarrhetic shellfish poisoning affecting cockles, which does not show the normally typical presence of okadaic acid, was first discovered by the FSA; at what locations; and what research has been commissioned into its causes. [37097]
Yvette Cooper: The Food Standards Agency became aware of the unusual aspects of the diarrhetic shellfish poisoning tests in cockles in October 2001. This has been seen in samples taken from the Burry Inlet, Anglesey, the Thames Estuary, the Wash and Strangford Lough. Initial investigations into the cause of the toxicity have been undertaken as part of the agency's on-going programmes of research and surveillance on shellfish toxins. The results of these investigations have been used to produce a structured plan of research on this toxicity, which will begin at the start of March.
Mr. Heald: To ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will list (a) the countries outside the EU where nurses trained, who registered with UKCC in each of the last four years and (b) the number from each such country. [37376]
Mr. Hutton: The information requested for the last three years where the data have been published is in the table.
Source:
Statistical Analysis of the UKCC Professional Register
4 Mar 2002 : Column 124W
The data published for the year to 31 March 1997 do not list the countries where entrants from overseas trained but does show that there were 2,633 overseas entrants.
Mr. Heald: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many NHS hospital and community health services, nursing, midwifery and health visiting staff there were within the community nursing areas of work broken down by qualification and region on (a) 30 September 1996, (b) 30 September 1997, (c) 30 September 1998 and (d) 30 September 1999. [37381]
Mr. Hutton: The information requested is shown in the table.
England | Northern and Yorkshire | Trent | Anglia and Oxford | North Thames | South Thames | South and West | West Midlands | North West | Others | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1996 | ||||||||||
Total nursing, midwifery and health visiting staff | 91,260 | 11,860 | 9,330 | 9,710 | 12,950 | 13,800 | 11,350 | 9,340 | 12,920 | 10 |
Total qualified | 75,280 | 9,610 | 7,610 | 7,920 | 10,640 | 11,340 | 9,790 | 7,930 | 10,450 | 10 |
Manager | 1,000 | 180 | 80 | 100 | 140 | 170 | 160 | 80 | 100 | 0 |
Registered sick children's nurse | 530 | 60 | 40 | 70 | 30 | 160 | 30 | 90 | 50 | 0 |
Health Visitor | 12,350 | 1,640 | 1,240 | 1,320 | 1,600 | 1,830 | 1,590 | 1,280 | 1,860 | 0 |
District Nurse | 14,250 | 1,860 | 1,380 | 1,540 | 1,800 | 2,040 | 1,840 | 1,540 | 2,250 | 0 |
Other 1st level | 25,820 | 3,140 | 2,830 | 2,480 | 4,160 | 4,040 | 2,960 | 2,670 | 3,540 | 10 |
Other 2nd level | 3,430 | 580 | 320 | 330 | 320 | 600 | 510 | 190 | 590 | 0 |
Practice Nurse | 17,900 | 2,160 | 1,720 | 2,080 | 2,580 | 2,500 | 2,700 | 2,080 | 2,090 | 0 |
Total unqualified | 15,980 | 2,250 | 1,720 | 1,800 | 2,310 | 2,460 | 1,560 | 1,410 | 2,470 | 0 |
Nursery nurse | 420 | 80 | 80 | 30 | 30 | 20 | 40 | 70 | 70 | 0 |
Nurse assistant/auxiliary | 15,570 | 2,170 | 1,640 | 1,760 | 2,280 | 2,440 | 1,520 | 1,340 | 2,400 | 0 |
England | Northern and Yorkshire | Trent | West Midlands | North West | Eastern | London | South East | South West | SHAs and Others | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1997 | ||||||||||
Total nursing, midwifery and health visiting staff | 94,110 | 12,130 | 9,690 | 10,370 | 13,250 | 9,840 | 14,030 | 16,130 | 8,660 | * |
Total qualified | 77,250 | 9,790 | 8,030 | 8,550 | 10,650 | 7,800 | 11,780 | 13,270 | 7,360 | * |
Manager | 1,000 | 170 | 90 | 80 | 110 | 120 | 180 | 160 | 90 | 0 |
Registered sick children's nurse | 780 | 40 | 60 | 200 | 80 | * | 170 | 200 | 20 | 0 |
Health Visitor | 12,410 | 1,560 | 1,320 | 1,300 | 1,840 | 1,150 | 1,880 | 2,170 | 1,200 | 0 |
District Nurse | 14,150 | 1,700 | 1,310 | 1,860 | 2,260 | 1,450 | 2,040 | 2,300 | 1,220 | 0 |
Other 1st level | 27,390 | 3,630 | 3,160 | 2,620 | 3,750 | 2,650 | 4,490 | 4,670 | 2,420 | 0 |
Other 2nd level | 3,130 | 510 | 280 | 210 | 490 | 280 | 460 | 440 | 470 | * |
Practice Nurse | 18,390 | 2,190 | 1,830 | 2,280 | 2,110 | 2,150 | 2,560 | 3,330 | 1,940 | 0 |
0 | ||||||||||
Total unqualified | 16,860 | 2,340 | 1,660 | 1,820 | 2,600 | 2,040 | 2,260 | 2,860 | 1,300 | 0 |
Nursery nurse | 510 | 100 | 90 | 100 | 70 | 60 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 0 |
Nurse assistant/auxiliary | 16,350 | 2,240 | 1,570 | 1,720 | 2,520 | 1,980 | 2,240 | 2,820 | 1,250 | 0 |
4 Mar 2002 : Column 125W
England | Northern and Yorkshire | Trent | West Midlands | North West | Eastern | London | South East | South West | SHAs and others | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1999 | ||||||||||
Total nursing, midwifery and health visiting staff | 101,810 | 13,090 | 10,190 | 11,840 | 14,860 | 10,230 | 14,950 | 17,730 | 8,910 | * |
Total qualified | 82,580 | 10,560 | 8,500 | 9,310 | 11,630 | 8,150 | 12,670 | 14,030 | 7,730 | * |
Manager | 1,020 | 170 | 60 | 80 | 120 | 150 | 190 | 170 | 80 | 0 |
Registered sick children's nurse | 530 | 40 | 50 | 70 | 120 | 10 | 80 | 150 | * | 0 |
Health Visitor | 12,800 | 1,580 | 1,360 | 1,420 | 1,840 | 1,140 | 2,050 | 2,220 | 1,190 | 0 |
District Nurse | 14,260 | 1,710 | 1,210 | 1,920 | 2,180 | 1,360 | 2,250 | 2,450 | 1,180 | 0 |
Other 1st level | 31,480 | 4,060 | 3,570 | 3,490 | 4,530 | 3,040 | 4,710 | 5,100 | 2,970 | * |
Other 2nd level | 3,000 | 570 | 220 | 220 | 420 | 230 | 610 | 340 | 380 | 0 |
Practice nurse | 19,500 | 2,430 | 2,020 | 2,110 | 2,410 | 2,230 | 2,780 | 3,590 | 1,930 | 0 |
Total unqualified | 19,230 | 2,530 | 1,700 | 2,530 | 3,230 | 2,080 | 2,280 | 3,700 | 1,180 | 0 |
Nursery nurse | 740 | 90 | 140 | 140 | 120 | 100 | 30 | 50 | 60 | 0 |
Nursing assistant/auxiliary | 18,490 | 2,440 | 1,560 | 2,390 | 3,120 | 1,970 | 2,250 | 3,650 | 1,120 | 0 |
Notes:
Figures are rounded to the nearest 10
Due to rounding totals may not equal the sum of component parts
Figures exclude learners and agency staff
1996 Practice nurse data collected as at 30 October and 1997 to 1997 Practice nurse data collected as at 1 October
Due to the new regional office boundaries in 1999 the 1997 and 1998 figures are estimated regional splits
The community areas of work that we can separately identify are community psychiatry, community learning disabilities and community services
* five or less and greater than zero
Sources:
Department of Health Non-Medical Workforce Census
Department of Health General and Personal Medical Services Statistics
Next Section | Index | Home Page |