Mr. Boswell: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what arrangements he has made for the publication of the annual report to Parliament on the implementation of the Learning Disability Strategy, with specific reference to the use of the Learning Disability Task Force and the occurrence of Learning Disability Week annually in June. 
23 Apr 2002 : Column 230W
Mr. Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the total external spending by his Department was on public-private partnership consultants in each of the last four years; how many full-time equivalent consultants were employed over this period; how many billed consultancy days there were per year; what the implied average cost of each PPP consultant was; how many consultancy firms were used by his Department over this period; and if he will make a statement. 
Mr. Hutton: I refer the hon. Member to the response I gave him on 5 March 2002, Official Report, column 280W, which listed the total external spend on private finance initiative consultancy work from 1998 to date.
Mr. Andrew Turner: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what arrangements are in place to provide assistance with the costs of travel to hospital for NHS treatment to residents of the Isle of Wight in receipt of (a) income support and (b) jobseeker's allowance. 
Ms Blears: The hospital travel costs scheme, part of the NHS low income scheme, provides financial assistance for patients in receipt of a qualifying benefit, for travel to hospital for NHS treatment under the care of a consultant. Income support and income-based jobseeker's allowance are qualifying benefits for the hospital travel costs scheme. The scheme provides full or partial reimbursement of travel costs throughout England.
Mr. Hunter: To ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will list the sites which will have the necessary training and equipment in place to fit digital hearing aids provided through the NHS contract from 200304. 
Jacqui Smith: I announced the sites which will be joining the Modernising Hearing Aid Services project this financial year on 10 April 2002, Official Report, column 465W. We will shortly be approaching all those trusts not currently involved in the project to invite them to put themselves forward to receive the training and equipment necessary to prepare them to join the project after April 2003. An announcement will be made in due course.
23 Apr 2002 : Column 231W
James Paget Healthcare NHS Trust
Royal National Throat Nose and Ear Hospital
Whipps Cross University Hospital NHS Trust
Bradford Hospitals NHS Trust
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Trust
Trafford Healthcare NHS Trust
Morecambe Bay Hospitals NHS Trust
Royal United Bath Hospital NHS Trust
United Bristol Healthcare NHS Trust (Children)
Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust
East Berkshire Community Health NHS Trust
Royal Berkshire and Battle Hospitals NHS Trust
Winchester and Eastleigh Healthcare NHS Trust
Queens Medical Centre University NHS Trust Nottingham
The Kings Mill Centre for Healthcare Services NHS Trust
Sheffield Children's Hospital NHS Trust (Children)
University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust
Royal Shrewsbury and Princess Royal Hospitals NHS Trust.
We know that a number of other trusts are obtaining digital hearing aids through the NHS contract and that others are providing digital aids outside of that contract. Full details are not available centrally.
Mr. Greg Knight: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the expected overall cost is of locating the headquarters of the North and East Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire Health Authority at York. 
Jacqui Smith: The cost incurred in provisionally locating and establishing the Strategic Health Authority (StHA) HQ for North and East Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire is for the rent of two offices in the York Science Park for February and March 2002. This will be approximately £3,500. This is the Project Office for the Strategic Health Authority pending a discussion about its permanent location.
On 20 March 2002, the StHA shadow Board discussed the option appraisal and work in progress to produce an outline business case for a permanent location. It was unanimously agreed that appropriate criteria had been used to inform the option appraisal on the location of the StHA and that the decision made by the Chairman and Chief Executive (Designate) that the York Science Park be the permanent location, was supported. Formal consideration of the outline business case was part of the first StHA Board meeting on 18 April 2002.
23 Apr 2002 : Column 232W
he has made of the costs (a) per establishment and (b) per room of the implementation of the regulatory impact assessment for adult placements; and if he will make a statement. 
Jacqui Smith [holding answer 21 March 2002]: The environmental standards for adult placements reflect the domestic nature of these placements and represent a lighter touch approach to regulation for this sector. We expect the implementation cost to be minimal. The costs of implementing environmental standards for adult placements was covered in the overall totals set out within the Regulatory Impact Assessment for Care Homes placed in the Library on 21 January 2002.
Mr. Burstow: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what steps he is taking to resolve the difference between the National Minimum Standard 29.3 in respect of police checks and the regulations giving effect to the standard. 
Jacqui Smith [holding answer 21 March 2002]: Regulation 19 of the Care Homes Regulations sets out the requirement that a satisfactory Criminal Records Check must be received by a provider before he may employ someone to work in the home. Standard 29.3 can be interpreted to mean that a care worker could be offered a job subject to receipt of a check. It is not intended to imply that people can be employed prior to receipt of that check which is prohibited by regulation.
Tony Wright: To ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will list the administrative manuals and internal guidance which his Department has made public as required by Part 1 of the Code of Practice on Access to Government Information; and which of these were first made available after May 1997. 
Ms Blears: Information on a large number of administrative manuals and internal guidance already exists in the public domain on the Department of Health internet site at www.doh.gov.uk and in particular in the:
Circulars on the internet site (COIN) at http://www.doh.gov.uk/ publications/coinh.html
Mr. Hancock: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how the appointment of new managers to failing hospitals will be decided; what system of assessment was used to rate those hospitals with a no star rating; and if he will make a statement. 
Ms Blears: Twelve national health service trusts were categorised as zero-star rated. The system of rating used to assess their performance in 200001 was published in September 2001. The 12 trusts are required to provide action plans setting out how they are going to achieve the level of performance improvement required. Each of
23 Apr 2002 : Column 233W
the action plans were assessed by the Department at the end of 2001 together with the level of performance improvement achieved by each of the trusts since the ratings were published. Where appropriate the Department additionally used the progress reports provided by the Commission for Health Improvement (CHI).
Following the assessment it was decided that five of the trusts should be made subject to franchise arrangements. The performance of the remaining seven trusts is being closely monitored to ensure that their action plans are successfully delivered. Support will continue to be provided, where required, by the Modernisation Agency.
The process to appoint new managers under franchising arrangements is underway. Candidates have been invited to apply if they are experienced national health service managers with a good track record for delivery. They are being shortlisted for specific national health service trusts, taking into account their expressed preferences and individual skills. Shortlisted candidates are being given a month to draw up a franchise plan.