|Previous Section||Index||Home Page|
Mr. Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what new steps his Department took in 200102 to consult the users of its services about their wishes and expectations; and if he will publish the findings. 
|Title||Actual/planned publication date||Report Number (where appropriate)|
|Disability and Carer ServiceCustomer Satisfaction Survey||Publication will be in line with normal Departmental arrangements|
|Benefits AgencyCustomer Satisfaction Survey||Results are used internally to help improve service delivery|
|Evaluation of the Minimum Income Guarantee Claim Line||August 2001||DWP Research Report 147|
|Survey of Entitled Non-recipients of the Minimum Income Guarantee and possible future Pension Credit Recipients||End of 2002|
|Survey of Attitudes to Electronic Government||May 2002|
|The Short-term effects of Compulsory Participation in|
|ONESurvey of Clients Cohort 2 Wave 1||December 2001||DWP Research Report 156|
|Medium term effects of Compulsory Participation in|
|ONESurvey of Clients Cohort 2 Wave 1||Winter 20023|
|Work Based Learning for AdultsLarge Scale Survey||July 2003|
|New Deal for Young People: Increasing Flexibilities in|
|Evaluation of the StepUp programme||First Interim Report due July 2003|
|Evaluation of remote Jobpoints||June 2002|
|Evaluation of enhanced JSA regime at 6 and 12 months||Date to be determined|
|Evaluation of ES Plus Online||Internal report completed February 2002|
|Joint Claims: Quantitative Survey Stage 2||June 2002|
|Evaluation of New Deal for Disabled PeopleNational|
|extension||Series of reports will be published from late 2002 to Spring 2004|
|Early Evaluation of Jobpoints in Pathfinder Offices||June 2001||ESR 76|
|Employment Service National Customer Satisfaction Survey|
|2000||June 2001||ESR 80|
|New Deal for the Long Term Unemployed Pilots:|
|quantitative evaluation Stage 2 survey||June 2001||ESR 81|
|Northern Region Call Centre Pilot Employers and|
|Jobseekers Surveys||July 2001||ESR 84|
|Evaluation of the New Deal 50 plus: Research with|
|Individuals (Wave 1)||September 2001||ESR 91|
|Joint Claims for JSAStage 1 Survey||September 2001||ESR 94|
|Evaluation of New Deal for Lone Parents A survey of Lone|
|Parents on Income Support||November 2001||ESR 101|
|Modernising ESBaseline Employer Survey||January 2002||ESR 107|
|Baseline Jobseeker Traffic Survey||January 2002||ESR 108|
|Early Views on the Internet Job Bank||January 2002||ESR 109|
26 Apr 2002 : Column 475W
Mr. Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for International Development how much has been spent by her Department on training in leadership skills for Ministers and officials in each of the last five years. 
As training budgets are delegated to individual DFID departments both in the UK and overseas, these figures may not represent the totality of spending in this area. An exhaustive calculation would involve disproportionate cost.
|19992000||Ministers Nil, Officials £250|
Mr. Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for International Development how much has been spent by her Department on training by the Royal Academy of Dramatic Arts for Ministers and officials in each of the last five years. 
26 Apr 2002 : Column 476W
Mr. Yeo: To ask the Secretary of State for International Development if she will list the newspapers subscribed to (a) Monday to Saturday and (b) on Sunday by her Department, stating for each subscription (i) the number of copies taken, and (ii) the annual cost. 
|Subscription||Number of copies (MonSat)||Number of copies (Sunday)||Annual cost|
|East Kilbride News||1||||£24.00|
|Independent on Sunday||||1||£72.00|
Mr. Yeo: To ask the Secretary of State for International Development if she will list the magazines and periodicals subscribed to by her Department, stating for each subscription the (a) number of copies taken and (b) annual cost. 
Hilary Benn: The Department's core, central subscriptions to magazines and periodicals are listed in tables, copies of which have been placed in the library. A number of DFID departments and country offices have direct journal subscriptions, but full details of decentralised expenditure could only be provided at disproportionate cost.
26 Apr 2002 : Column 477W
Hilary Benn: As my right hon. Friend said to the House recently, Official Report, 17 April, column 561, development in the Sudan cannot take place around an ongoing war. It is not realistic to expect sustained improvements to education while the conflict continues. We are trying to improve the humanitarian effort and will do what we can to support education for children affected by the conflict within that context.
Mr. Drew: To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what recent discussions she has had with the Government of the Sudan on the subject of its use of oil revenues for development purposes. 
Hilary Benn: During my right hon. Friend's visit to the Sudan in January she made clear to the government the importance of their commitment to poverty reduction and the use of government revenues (not only from oil) for sustainable development.
Harry Cohen: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what guidelines are set for the (a) circumstances and (b) length of custody of persons with a history of mental illness; and if he will make a statement. 
Mr. Denham: If a police officer has any suspicion that a person held in police custody may be mentally disordered or mentally handicapped, he must apply special protections for that person as set out in the relevant code of practice (Code C) issued under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE). These include summoning an "appropriate adult" to assist and advise the detained person and (where the person appears to be suffering from a mental disorder) calling for the police surgeon.
Persons with a history of mental illness are subject to the same rules covering length of detention as other detainees. Under PACE where a person has been arrested for an offence they may be detained in police custody for up to 24 hours without being charged. This period can be extended to 36 hours by a police officer of the rank of Superintendent or above where a person is arrested for a serious arrestable offence. Further periods of detention up to a maximum of 96 hours can be approved by a magistrates' court.
Where a person arrested is charged with an offence they must be released from police detention unless certain conditions apply, such as where the custody officer has reasonable grounds for believing that the person charged will fail to appear in court to answer to bail. Where such a person is kept in police detention they must be brought
26 Apr 2002 : Column 478W
before the relevant magistrates' court as soon as is practicable and normally not later than the first sitting after they are charged with the offence.
Where a person charged with an offence is arrested on warrant for failing to attend a magistrates' court, they must be taken back to that magistrates' court as soon as practicable. If a person is arrested in a different part of the country they must appear not later than the first sitting of the magistrates' court after their transfer back to the relevant area.
All persons detained in police custody have their detention reviewed on a regular basis. The first review is no later than six hours after the detention was first authorised. The second review is no later than nine hours after the first review. Subsequent reviews are at intervals of not more than nine hours.
A mentally disordered or mentally handicapped person who has been detained under section 136 of the Mental Health Act 1983 can be taken to a police station as a place of safety to be assessed. The person can be detained only until such time as they have been interviewed and examined by an approved social worker and a registered medical practitioner, and suitable arrangements have been made for their treatment and care.
There are currently several strands of work focused on improving police practice in relation to mentally ill individuals. The Home Office, the Department of Health and the Association of Chief Police Officers are considering the development of national protocols covering the interaction between the police and health services in dealing with the mentally ill. The current review of the PACE Codes of Practice is seeking to strengthen further the protections for mentally ill detainees, particularly in terms of assessing their vulnerabilities and fitness for interview. In addition, the review of the Mental Health Act which is underway recognises that police cells are not generally appropriate places for assessing whether a person needs medical treatment.
|Next Section||Index||Home Page|