|Previous Section||Index||Home Page|
Mr. Bercow: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many and what proportion of the staff of his Department are (a) job sharing, (b) terming working and (c) engaged in another form of flexible working. 
Ruth Kelly: Further to my answer of 13 March 2002, Official Report, columns 111011W, there are 16 job sharers in HM Treasury (1.4 per cent. of total staff), one term worker (0.1 per cent. of total staff) and 55 other staff engaged in other forms of flexible working (4.8 per cent. of total staff) (all figures rounded to nearest 0.1 per cent.).
Mr. Boateng: The Government expect the Community Development Venture Fund to be launched and begin operating shortly. The first investments are likely to be made in 200203, and the fund is likely to be invested within three to six years, allowing a reserve for follow-on investments as portfolio companies grow. The investment profile and timing will depend on the opportunities that the fund identifies, the time taken to bring companies to the point of investment readiness, and on market conditions.
Ruth Kelly: The Treasury's latest economic forecast is set out in Chapter B of the Financial Statement and Budget Report, which was published on 17 April. UK GDP is forecast to increase by between 2 and 2.5 per cent. in 2002.
Hugh Robertson: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what assessment he has made of the impact of stamp duty on commercial property on (a) property unit trusts and (b) the attractiveness of collective investment schemes investing in property for institutional pension fund investors. 
29 Apr 2002 : Column 544W
Mr. Don Foster: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what recent assessment has been undertaken by his Department of the (a) current and (b) projected future availability of sulphur-free fuel in (i) the UK and (ii) Europe; and if he will make a statement. 
Under a Common Position reached at the December 2001 EU Environment Council, member states set an EU-wide maximum limit for sulphur of 10ppm (termed "sulphur-free" fuel) from 1 January 2009, this date being subject to review by the Commission with respect to diesel fuel. The Common Position would also require member states to ensure the widespread availability of these fuels from 1 January 2005 in order that it is available for the latest technology vehicles that can take best advantage of it. The European Parliament will now consider the Common Position at its Second Reading.
Almost all petrol and diesel sold in the UK is already ultra low (50ppm) sulphur. Sulphur-free petrol and diesel has now been introduced at 18 retail sites in and around Edinburgh. Current availability of sulphur free fuels in most EU member states is minimal. However, sulphur- free diesel is quite widely available in Sweden and all super unleaded petrol is sulphur-free in Germany.
In the period up to 1 January 2009, the availability of sulphur-free fuels will be influenced by the rate of investment in new refinery technology needed to produce the fuels and also the level of fiscal incentives offered by individual member states to encourage its supply. In this respect, the Chancellor, in his recent Budget statement, announced plans to introduce duty incentives favouring sulphur-free fuels in 2003, subject to European agreement. Germany has also announced similar plans. The Benelux countries are also expected to follow this UK and German lead with the result that fairly widespread availability may be expected in these countries from 2003 onwards. Under the terms of the directive, widespread availability is to be expected in all EU member states from 2005.
Norman Lamb: To ask the Secretary of State for International Development (1) what information she has collated with regard to the formal procedures followed by the Government of Tanzania in respect of consideration of tenders for supply of an air traffic control system; and whether such procedures met recognised international standards; 
Clare Short: DFID has not collated specific information regarding formal procedures adopted by the Government of Tanzania on the tender process in this case. However, I can confirm that DFID has been actively involved in helping the Government of Tanzania draft and
29 Apr 2002 : Column 545W
29 Apr 2002 : Column 546W
her Department has recruited in each month since June 2001 at (a) executive officer level and (b) administrative level. 
|Month||Number of net additional staff recruited at executive officer level(6) EntrantsLeaversNet position||Number of net additional staff recruited at administrative level(7) EntrantsLeaversNet position||Total of net additional staff recruited at executive officer and administrative level|
(6) Grade B2
(7) Grades C1 and C2
Mr. Wray: To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what aid went to each South American country in the last 12 months; and whether it was ring-fenced for particular projects. 
(8) Includes provisional figures for 200102 and provisional figures for DFID debt relief (comprising both interest and principal foregone under retrospective terms adjustment, repayment which would have fallen due in year).
(9) A regional programme including Honduras, Nicaragua, Guatemala, El Salvador.
In addition to these figures the European Commission spent £153 million in Latin America (which includes Argentina, Chile, Paraguay, Uruguay and Venezuela in addition to the countries listed) of which UK share is approximately over £29 million which is drawn from my Department's budget.
All our programmes are carried out in accordance with our country strategies, which are jointly agreed with our counterparts in country. Our role is to add value to the combined effort to the international community to create the right conditions necessary for poverty reduction.
Mr. Wray: To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what proportion of aid from the UK was spent on (a) education, (b) health and (c) environmental projects overseas in the last 12 months. 
|Renewable natural resources||12|
Environment is such a cross cutting issue that it is mainstreamed into many of our projects and programmes and as such we do not have a separate environment market for our projects. Therefore for the purposes of answering this question we have taken renewable natural resources as a proxy.
These figures represent expenditure on projects specific to sectors but do not capture the full extent of our efforts in each policy area because they exclude multi-sector projects, block funding to civil society organisations and budget support or balance of payments. Also excluded are activities in sectors funded through multilateral channels.
29 Apr 2002 : Column 547W
|Next Section||Index||Home Page|