Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
Lynne Jones: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what discussions he has had with ministerial colleagues about the conduct of consultation exercises; and if he will make a statement about conformity with Criterion 6 Cabinet Office Guidelines. [55707]
Mr. Leslie: No formal discussions have taken place with ministerial colleagues on the general conduct of consultation exercises. The conduct of such exercises is the responsibility of each Government Department and its agencies. Compliance with the Code of Practice on Written Consultation, including conformity with criterion 6 of the Code, also rests with each Department.
Mr. Beith: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister (1) if he will list the responsibilities of the Cabinet Office Parliamentary Branch; [56271]
(3) for each year since 1997 to the latest year for which the information is available, (a) how many staff were working in the Cabinet Office Parliamentary Branch and (b) what the total cost of the operation of the Cabinet Office Parliamentary Branch was. [56248]
The Deputy Prime Minister and First Secretary of State: The Cabinet Office Parliamentary Branch supports all Ministers within the Cabinet Office, as well as the Lord Privy Seal, in all their dealings with Parliament.
A total of £9,613.85 including VAT was spent on a database for Cabinet Office parliamentary questions in December 2000. The branch is also supported by the Cabinet Office in its usual contract for IT equipment. There are no plans for any further expenditure on IT hardware.
Expenditure for the Parliamentary Branch is as follows:
Year | Expenditure (£000) | Post Numbers |
---|---|---|
199798 | 106 | 4 |
199899 | 142 | 5 |
19992000 | 147 | 5 |
200001 | (11)162 | 5 |
200102 | (11)171 | 6 |
(11) From 2000 the budget for Parliamentary Branch was incorporated into the Parliamentary and Ministerial Support Services therefore the specific information requested on the Parliamentary Branch could be provided only at disproportionate cost. Therefore the costs listed above are for Parliamentary Branch staffing only.
15 May 2002 : Column 717W
Dr. Kumar: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister how many households, broken down by (a) class, (b) age and (c) region, have a PC; and what figures he has collated on other major European countries in terms of rates of household and work place access to the internet. [55873]
Ruth Kelly: I have been asked to reply.
The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician. I have asked him to reply.
Letter from Len Cook to Dr. Ashok Kumar, dated 15 May 2002:
Social class of head of household | Percentage |
---|---|
Professional etc. | 80 |
Managerial and technical | 70 |
Skilled non-manual | 55 |
Skilled manual | 47 |
Partly skilled occupations | 39 |
Unskilled occupations | 24 |
All households | 45 |
Source:
Family Expenditure Survey, 200001
Age of head of household (years) | Percentage |
---|---|
Under 30 | 44 |
30 and under 50 | 61 |
50 and under 65 | 48 |
65 and under 75 | 23 |
75 or over | 7 |
All households | 45 |
Source:
Family Expenditure Survey, 200001
Source:
Family Expenditure Survey, 200001
15 May 2002 : Column 718W
Table 4 below shows the percentage of households and enterprises with Internet access for major European countries for 2000, the latest available consistent estimates.
Country | Households with Internet access(12) | Enterprises with Internet access(13) |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 32 | 63 |
Sweden | 54 | 90 |
Germany | 27 | 67 |
France | 12 | (14) |
Italy | 15 | 66 |
(12) Source: UKFamily Expenditure Survey (April 2000 to March 2001); Sweden and GermanyEurobarometer; France and ItalyNational Statistics Institutes.
(13) Source: Eurostat co-ordinated e-Commerce surveys 2000. Enterprises with 10 or more employees. Richard Deiss (2002): "e-Commerce in Europe, Statistics in Focus".
(14) Not available
Mr. Beith: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister (1) if he will list the occasions when departments have sought his Department's guidance in accordance with paragraph 8 of his Department's guidance on the sponsorship of Government events in (a) 2000 and (b) 2001, stating in each case the (i) department and (ii) event concerned; [56249]
Mr. Leslie: The 1999 guidelines, "Sponsorship of Government Events", were superseded in July 2000 by the current guidelines, "Guidance to Departments on Sponsorship of Government Activities".
Individual Departments are responsible for ensuring that the central guidance is appropriately applied when they are seeking sponsorship for their events and activities. My officials provide advice to departments on a case-by-case basis when requested to do so. Not all requests will be recorded as some will be no more than a passing request for advice in the margins of other discussions.
15 May 2002 : Column 719W
Mr. Lidington: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if it is his policy to freeze the level of the threshold for the higher rate of income tax in 200304. [52951]
Dawn Primarolo [holding answer 26 April 2002]: No, the Government's plans, as set out in the Budget, assume the indexation of the basic rate limit (£29,900 in 200203).
Mr. Frank Field: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many records of individuals were stored in the national insurance record system as at 31 December 2001; how many of these records concerned individuals who are known to be deceased; and in how many of these records there has been no contributions activity since 1 January 2001. [54723]
Dawn Primarolo: On the basis of information held, the position is that 69,852,367 individual records were stored in the national insurance record system at 31 December 2001.
5,987,933 of those concerned individuals who are known to be deceased. Records are retained beyond death because of potential and ongoing claims by dependent spouse.
There has been no contributions activity on 5,784,733 of these records since 1 January 2001.
Next Section | Index | Home Page |