Previous Section Index Home Page


Correspondence

Mr. Salmond: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs when he intends to reply to the letter dated 13 March from the hon. Member for Banff and Buchan regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. [56677]

Mr. Bradshaw: I replied on behalf of my right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary on 9 May. As I said in my letter, I apologise for the delay in responding, which is due to the very heavy volume of correspondence this subject generates.

SOLICITOR-GENERAL

Fraud

Mr. Frank Field: To ask the Solicitor-General what the estimated level of losses to fraud and corruption was in (a) her Department's Vote 1 budget and (b) her Department's Vote 2 budget for (i) 1999–2000 and (ii) 2000–01. [54699]

The Solicitor-General [holding answer 8 May 2002]: The Crown Prosecution Service is funded by a single vote. There were no losses to fraud and corruption in 1999–2000. Losses in 2000–01 totalled £1,088.75.

No other losses were recorded from the budgets of the Law Officers' departments.

Ministerial Training

Mr. Bercow: To ask the Solicitor-General how much has been spent by her Department on training in leadership skills for Ministers and officials in each of the last five years. [52714]

The Solicitor-General [holding answer 26 April 2002]: Nothing has been spent by my Department on training in leadership skills for Ministers.

In relation to those departments for which the Attorney-General is responsible, the Treasury Solicitor's Department and Serious Fraud Office only have figures for the last three years. The figures are as follows:

Treasury Solicitor's Department
£

Year
19993,240
20001,175
20012,150

Serious Fraud Office
£

Year
1999–20002,775
2000–0124,975
2001–027,100

Crown Prosecution Service


20 May 2002 : Column 67W

Leadership training undertaken by the senior management team in the Crown Prosecution Service has been carried out in two areas. Training in a one-to-one coaching programme began in March 2000 and finished in September 2000, the cost of this initiative was £30,000. A Chief Crown Prosecutors Management and Leadership programme began in September 2001 and finished in February 2002, the cost of this programme was £211,000.

While officials at HMCPS Inspectorate have received leadership training, this has not resulted in any cost to the Department.

IT Contracts

Richard Younger-Ross: To ask the Solicitor-General what has been the total expenditure of his Department on IT systems and support in each year from May 1997 to date; how many IT contracts have been let in each of those years; of the other main contracting party in each of those contracts, how many have been (a) companies whose registered office is in (i) England and Wales, (ii) Scotland and (iii) Northern Ireland and (b) foreign companies; and what are the names of the companies falling within category (a). [33692]

The Solicitor-General [holding answer 7 February 2002]: The total expenditure of the CPS on IT systems and support from May 1997 to date was:

£ million
1997–984.28
1998–999.83
1999–20007.36
2000–0121.74
2001–0221.82

Records show that a total of 40 contracts were let during this period, as follows:

Number of contracts
1997–989
1998–9910
1999–20009
2000–016
2001–026

The 34 businesses that are the main contracting parties in each of the contracts, all have their registered offices in England and Wales. None of the main contracting parties have their registered office in Scotland, Northern Ireland or foreign countries.

The names of the companies that are within category (a) are:


20 May 2002 : Column 68W

The Serious Fraud Office's total expenditure on IT systems and support in each year from May 1997 to date was as follows:

£
1997–98807,000
1998–99988,000
1999–20001,090,000
2000–011,920,000
2001–021,930,000

The number of IT contracts let in each of those years was:

IT contracts let
1997
19981
1999
2000
20011
2002

These contracts were signed with companies registered in England and Wales. One of them was negotiated with IBM (UK) plc, the other was with Cedar Group plc.

Although the Serious Fraud Office negotiated other contracts for IT services, these were small and the costs of researching the details of the companies involved would be disproportionate.Since May 1997 the Treasury Solicitor's Department's expenditure on IT systems including telecoms has been as follows.

20 May 2002 : Column 69W

£

IT SystemsTelecomsTotal
1997–98475,531124,740600,271
1998–99647,711147,707795,418
1999–2000523,361140,600663,961
2000–011,052,515160,3801,212,895
2001–02924,267130,829(16)1,055,096

(16) Year to date.


In addition the Department incurred the following paybill expenditure on staff to support and develop IT systems.

£
1997–98248,468
1998–99326,400
1999–2000449,200
2000–01558,852
2001–02(17)497,681

(17) Year to date.


The Department has used framework contracts under the aegis of the Office of Government Commerce (OGC): GCat for the supply of IT goods; and S-CAT for the supply of IT services. The Department routinely sources hardware, software and IT services under these contracts and such purchases do not constitute separate contracts in their own right.

Purchases of equipment, software and services have been made from a variety of suppliers under both framework contracts, the main ones being:


In addition to its use of the OGC framework contracts, the Treasury Solicitor's Department has let IT contracts to the following companies, all of whose registered offices are in England and Wales:


The Legal Secretariat to the Law Officers total expenditure on IT systems and support in each year from May 1997 to date was as follows:

£
1997–9892,625
1998–9935,992
1999–200030,492
2000–0137,576
2001–0240,387

The number of IT contracts let in each of those years was:


20 May 2002 : Column 70W

Number of contracts
1997
19981
1999
20001
2001
2001

These contracts were signed with companies registered in England and Wales. One of them was negotiated with 4Front Networks and the other with Selection Services.

LORD CHANCELLOR'S DEPARTMENT

Disclosure of Interests

Mr. Paul Marsden: To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department what rules apply to the disclosure of interests on the part of those serving on public bodies which are responsible to the Lord Chancellor's Department. [56454]

Ms Rosie Winterton: Executive and advisory non- departmental public bodies are required to adopt a board members' code, based on guidance produced by the Cabinet Office, and they should have registers of interests. The definition of interests is ultimately for individual Departments since they are best placed to decide what might be thought to influence members of each of their NDPBs.

Information on the executive NDPBs sponsored by this Department is as follows:


The Department's advisory NDPBs also have codes and registers.


Next Section Index Home Page