Previous Section Index Home Page


19 Sept 2002 : Column 294W—continued

Fuel Consumption

Tim Loughton: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what assessment her Department has made of the effectiveness of the intelligent motor generator technology developed by Ricardo in reducing fuel consumption in road vehicles. [72625]

Mr. Meacher [holding answer 24 July 2002]: I refer the hon. Member to the answer given by my hon. Friend the Parliamentary Under Secretary to Transport (Mr. Jamieson) on 24 July, Official Report, column 1249W.

Meat Imports

Geraldine Smith: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what controls on meat imports are in place to guard against foot and mouth and other diseases. [73654]

Are You Doing Your Bit? Campaign

Mr Stunell: To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what the level of funding for the Are You Doing Your Bit? campaign was in each year since 1998; what funds have been made available to support this campaign in (a) this and (b) the next three years; and if she will make a statement. [72744]

Mr. Stunell: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what measures she is taking to enhance the effectiveness of the Are You Doing Your Bit? campaign; and if she will make a statement. [72743]

Mr. Meacher: Expenditure on the "Are you doing your bit?" campaign, covering both environmental and transport topics, was £3.4 million in 1998–99, £7.0 million in 1999–

19 Sept 2002 : Column 295W

2000 and £9.3 million in 2000–01. In 2001–02 most of the campaign's resources were reallocated to rural support, during the outbreak of foot and mouth disease, and expenditure was £0.6 million. The Department is currently reviewing the effectiveness of public awareness activities in this area and in the meantime, in the current financial year, is making only minimal financial commitments on the "Are You Doing You Bit?" campaign. The distribution of budgets for public awareness activities for the following three financial years has yet to be decided, in the light of the overall figures for the Department settled in this year's Spending Review.

19 Sept 2002 : Column 296W

Biotechnology Research

Alan Simpson: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what biotechnology research projects in (a) agriculture and (b) biomedics have been supported by the Department; and what level of public investment has gone into them in each of the last three years. [73241]

Mr. Meacher: The biotechnology research projects funded by the Department in the last 3 years in (a) Agriculture are available in the Library of the House. The total costs over this period are summarised in the table below:

1999–2000 (£millions)*2000–01 (£millions)*2001–02 (£millions)2002–03 (£millions)***
GM and Non-GM biotechnology23.42727.324
Research to underpin safety assessment of GMOs in the environment1.92.4**2.4**2.9**
Total spend on Biotechnology25.329.429.726.9

* Figures include relevant DETR and MAFF programmes.

** Figures exclude food-related risk assessment projects, which were transferred to the Food Standards Agency.

*** All figures are provisional.

(b) Biomedics—The Department does not support research in this area. Biotechnology is defined as the application of biological organisms, systems and processes to manufacturing and service industries. This definition covers genetic modification (GM) research but goes much wider to include, among other techniques, fused cell techniques, protein engineering, fermentation and cell culture techniques, the production of vaccines and monoclonal antibodies.

Plastic Recyling Facilities

Mr. Flook: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if she will make a statement on the availability of plastic recyling facilities in (a) the South West and (b) Somerset. [73249]

Mr. Meacher: The Department does not keep a central record of recycling facilities. However, there are a number of internet sites that can search for your nearest recycling facility.

I understand from one of the local authorities in the area that two local authorities in Somerset collect plastic bottles for recycling—Taunton Deane Borough Council and South Somerset District Council. In addition, 4 Household Waste Recycling Centres (HWRC) run by the county also collect plastic bottles.

I also understand that the operating contracts for 13 of the HWRC's are due to be renegotiated shortly. I understand that the new contracts will make a stronger commitment to recycling in Somerset and many sites will introduce plastic collection.

Common Agricultural Policy

Mr. Wray: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what recent proposals he has put to European colleagues for the reform of the Common Agricultural Policy. [73210]

Mr. Morley: On 10 July, the European Commission published its proposals for reform of the Common Agricultural Policy. These form a good basis for discussion, and in many ways respond to UK calls that significant reform of the CAP is required. My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State set out the UK's initial response to the proposals at the 15 July EU Agriculture Council. As she explained, the Government believes that the general thrust of the proposals of further market reform, decoupling of direct payments from production, and reinforcement of the rural development regulation is the right one. But in a number of key areas we consider that the proposals do not go far enough and do not adequately respond to the challenges ahead. In particular, the Commission's proposals on modulation would simply recycle money within the CAP while we would like to have seen a proposal which reduced subsidies while delivering real budgetary savings.

Departmental Jobs

Annabelle Ewing: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many jobs under the remit of her Department in (a) the core department, (b) non-departmental public bodies, (c) executive agencies and (d) independent statutory bodies, organisations and bodies financially sponsored by her Department and other such organisations are located in (i) Scotland, (ii) England, excluding Greater London, (iii) Greater London, (iv) Wales, (v) Northern Ireland and (vi) overseas, broken down by (A) whole-time equivalent jobs and (B) the percentage per individual department, body or organisation. [72730]

Mr. Morley [holding answer 24 July 2002]: The table below shows the number of staff in the former MAFF and its executive agencies located in the regions specified as at 1 April 2001, the latest date for which published data is available. The requested information on non-departmental public bodies and other independent statutory bodies is not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

ScotlandLondonRest of EnglandWalesNorthern IrelandOverseas
Dept/Body/ OrganisationNo. (FTE)per cent. No. (FTE)per cent. No. (FTE)per cent. No. (FTE)per cent. No. (FTE)per cent. No. (FTE)per cent. Total (FTE)
MAFF (a)761194328491970117200607061
CEFAS (c)0000480100000000480
CSL (c)0000580100000000580
FRCA (c)0023364596410000672
PSD (c)001118199000000182
VLA (c)383772682962629300001135
VMD (c)0010910000000000109

Key:

(a) Core department (excluding agencies)

(c) Executive agencies


19 Sept 2002 : Column 297W

EU Agriculture Council

Annabelle Ewing: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, pursuant to the answer of 17 July 2002, Official Report, column 309W, which Scottish Executive Minister she met on 15 July in Brussels prior to the EU Agriculture Council meeting. [72708]

Mr. Morley [holding answer 24 July 2002]: On this occasion the Scottish Minister for Environment and Rural Affairs was represented by an official.

Pesticides

Mr. Weir: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what recent research her Department has carried out to determine the level of pesticide residues in food within the UK; what checks are carried out on imported foods to determine the level of pesticide residues; and what plans she has to introduce statutory targets to reduce the use of pesticides in food production. [73202]

Mr. Morley: The Government conducts a wide-ranging annual surveillance programme for pesticide residues in food including imported food. Some 4,000 samples are analysed annually and the programme generates results for over 100,000 pesticide/commodity food combinations. All the results are published on a website: www.pesticides.gov.uk/committees/PRC/prc.htm

The Maximum Residue Levels regulations apply equally to imports. Additionally, the general provisions of the Food Safety Act 1990 apply at all times. The food safety requirements are that food must not have been rendered injurious to health; be unfit; or be so contaminated—whether by extraneous matter or otherwise—that it would be unreasonable to expect it to be sold in that state. These legislative controls are backed up by the monitoring programme described above. Around half of the samples tested are of imported food.

The Government has no plans to introduce statutory targets to reduce the use of pesticides in food production


Next Section Index Home Page