Previous Section Index Home Page


15 Oct 2002 : Column 748W—continued

Personal Data

Harry Cohen: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many individuals have personal data relating to fingerprints or DNA stored on national police computers; and what percentage of these records relate to individuals who are (a) not criminals and (b) not suspected of any criminality. [74585]

Mr. Denham: On September 2002 the total number of profiles held on the National DNA Database was 1,884,450. Of these there were 55,032 profiles marked as acquitted. These were all taken under Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) from all those charged with or informed they will be reported for a recordable offence, but against whom the prosecution was not proceeded with or who were subsequently acquitted by the courts.

The total number of fingerprints on the National Automated Fingerprint Identification System (NAFIS) was 5,213,106 on 3 October 2002. Currently if a prosecution is not proceeded with or a person is acquitted by the courts, the fingerprint record is weeded from NAFIS once the result is recorded on the Police National Computer. In light of the changes in the Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001, further proposals are under consideration in relation to the system to allow for the retention of fingerprints on NAFIS in such cases.

The Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 changes to PACE have been subject to Judicial Review. On 12 September 2002 the Court of Appeal ruled on the cases of S & Marper v. Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police that the new legislation did not breach the European Convention on Human Rights.

Harry Cohen: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many times the revised certificate he signed last December with respect to section 28 of the Data Protection Act 1998 has been used by the Security Service in relation to the disclosure of personal data to the Service; and if he will make a statement. [74583]

Mr. Blunkett: None in legal proceedings.

I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave him on 12 June 2002, Official Report, column 1306W outlining circumstances in which the Security Service might provide an explanation of the operation of section 28 of the Data Protection Act 1998 and a copy of the revised certificate.

ID Cards

Harry Cohen: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will place in the Library the response of the Information Commissioner to his consultation concerning his recent proposals for ID/entitlement cards; and if he will make a statement. [74485]

Beverley Hughes: In line with the Government's code of practice on written consultations, all comments received on the consultation paper published by my right hon. Friend the Home Secretary on 3 July may be published unless the person or organisation submitting them asks for them not to be.

15 Oct 2002 : Column 749W

The consultation period closes on 10 January 2003. A response from the Information Commissioner has not yet been received. The Commissioner's office has confirmed that there would be no objection to placing a copy of its response in the Library and this will be done when it is received.

Immigration

Mr. Dismore: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what criteria his Department follows for (a) initiating deportation proceedings under the Immigration Act 1971 and (b) initiating denaturalisation proceedings under the British Nationality Act 1981. [74750]

Beverley Hughes: A person who is not a British citizen is liable to deportation on the grounds that this would be conducive to the public good, or if another person to whose family he belongs is being deported (limited to the spouse and any minor dependent children of the person being deported). He or she may also be deported following a recommendation made by a court under section 3(6) of the Immigration Act 1971.

Before any decision to deport is taken, all relevant factors are taken into account, including: age; length of residence in and strength of connections with the United Kingdom; personal history, including character, conduct and employment record; domestic circumstances; criminal record; compassionate circumstances; and any representations received on the person's behalf (paragraph 364–367 of the Immigration Rules (HC395 as amended)).

The criteria for deprivation of citizenship are set out in section 40 of the British Nationality Act 1981. The grounds are that the person either obtained his nationality by fraud, has shown himself to be disloyal or disaffected towards Her Majesty, has unlawfully traded or communicated with an enemy in time of war, or has been sentenced within five years of becoming British to at least 12 months imprisonment.

Mr. Flook: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will make a statement on the handling of the application for indefinite leave to remain by Irena Iotova Nikolova (C1059475) of Taunton. [74326]

Beverley Hughes: The Immigration and Nationality Directorate notified Mrs. Nikolova's representatives on 1 October 2002 that she had been granted indefinite leave to remain. A letter was enclosed apologising for both the delay in resolving her case and the administrative failures which resulted in the original application being erroneously refused. I echo those apologies.

Bob Spink: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) what estimate he has made of the number of illegal refugees entering Britain in each of the last five years; [74486]

15 Oct 2002 : Column 750W

Beverley Hughes: The number of principal asylum applicants granted exceptional leave to remain in the United Kingdom in each of the last five years is given in the table.

YearGrants of ELR 1 , 2 Granted ELR under clearance backlog exercise
19973,115
19983,910
19992,46510,195
200011,47510,020
2001(p)21,175

Notes:

Figures are rounded to the nearest five.

1 includes reconsideration cases in 2000 or 2001 where an asylum decision by the Secretary of State is later required to be reconsidered as a result of additional information or significant changes in current circumstances and country information.

2 Data for 2000 may include some cases decided under the backlog criteria.

(p) Data are provisional and subject to change.

I regret that there are currently no estimates of the number of persons who have entered Britain illegally or remained in Britain after being refused asylum. The Research Development and Statistics Directorate of the Home Office has commissioned research to look at the methodology of sizing the illegal population and is due to report next year.


Mr. Lazarowicz: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many organisations, broken down by region and nation, have been approved for registration or exemption by the office of the Immigration Service Commissioner. [74142]

Beverley Hughes: As of 1 October 2002, the number of organisations registered with, or exempted by, the Office of the Immigration Services Commissioner (OISC) was as follows:

EnglandOrganisations registered with the OISCOrganisations exempted by the OISC
Avon18
Bedfordshire210
Berkshire410
Buckinghamshire17
Cambridgeshire08
Cheshire19
Cleveland05
Cornwall18
County Durham08
Cumbria08
Derbyshire17
Devon013
Dorset010
East Sussex010
East Yorks11
Essex027
Gloucestershire07
Hampshire024
Herefordshire01
Hertfordshire117
Isle of Wight01
Kent126
Lancashire846
Leicestershire015
Lincolnshire09
London87183
Merseyside122
Middlesex1314
Norfolk010
North Humberside02
North Yorkshire010
Northamptonshire010
Northumberland07
Nottinghamshire011
Oxfordshire114
Shropshire06
Somerset05
South Humberside02
South Yorkshire024
Staffordshire015
Suffolk011
Surrey1029
Tyne & Wear09
Warwickshire07
West Midlands927
West Sussex011
West Yorkshire324
Wiltshire28
Worcestershire06
Total148762

15 Oct 2002 : Column 751W

Northern IrelandOrganisations registered with the OISCOrganisations exempted by the OISC
County Antrim116
County Down17
County Armagh03
County Tyrone03
County Fermanagh01
County Derry01
Total231

ScotlandOrganisations registered with the OISCOrganisations exempted by the OISC
Aberdeen City01
Aberdeenshire01
Angus03
Argyll & Bute00
Clackmannanshire00
Comhairle nan Eilean
Siar04
Dumfries & Galloway17
Dundee City01
East Ayrshire01
East Dunbartonshire01
East Lothian02
East Renfrewshire01
Edinburgh City010
Falkirk03
Fife00
Glasgow City310
Highland05
Inverclyde00
Midlothian03
Moray01
North Ayrshire06
North Lanarkshire05
Orkney Islands11
Perth & Kinross02
Renfrewshire01
Scottish Borders04
Shetland Islands01
South Ayrshire00
South Lanarkshire04
Stirling02
West Dunbartonshire02
West Lothian00
Total582

15 Oct 2002 : Column 752W

WalesOrganisations registered with the OISCOrganisations exempted by the OISC
Blaenau Gwent01
Bridgend01
Caerphilly01
Cardiff07
Carmarthenshire03
Ceredigion02
Conwy01
Denbighshire01
Flintshire02
Isle of Anglesey01
Merthyr Tydfil01
Monmouthshire04
Neath Port Talbot03
Newport12
Pembrokeshire02
Powys03
Rhondda Cynon Taff03
Swansea02
Torfaen01
Vale of Glamorgan03
Wrexham01
Total145

Ms Drown: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether the time limits on early clearance certificates placed in passports abroad start from when the visa is granted and is given an early clearance certificate stamp. [73793]

Mr. Mike O'Brien: I have been asked to reply.

From 2 October 2000, entry clearances have conferred leave to enter. Leave to enter the United Kingdom is considered to commence on the ''valid from'' date on the entry clearance and not from the date of arrival in the United Kingdom.


Next Section Index Home Page