Previous Section Index Home Page


28 Oct 2002 : Column 647W—continued

Ex-Service Personnel (Benefits)

Mr. Drew: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what plans he has to compel local authorities to give disregard for housing and council tax benefit to ex-service personnel. [76984]

Malcolm Wicks: We believe that the current disregard of #10 a week for war disablement and war widows' pensions in the income-related benefits strikes the right balance between acknowledging the special reasons for these pensions and prudent use of public funds.

In addition to the statutory provision, local authorities have the discretionary power to disregard up to the full amount of any war pension in housing benefit and council tax benefit. Any amount on top of the #10 statutory disregard is funded from authorities' own resources.

Local authorities, through their discretionary schemes, are best placed to determine the needs of their local residents, taking account of local priorities. We have no plans to change the present arrangements.

28 Oct 2002 : Column 648W

Incapacity Benefit

Mr. Boswell: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many occupational pensioners have protected claims to incapacity benefit because their initial date of claim preceded the inception of the disallowance of such pensions; and how many of such initial claimants have subsequently returned to work. [76409]

Mr. Nicholas Brown: Incapacity benefit recipients with an occupational pension were not separately identified prior to 6 April 2001 as receipt of a pension was irrelevant to their claim. Therefore this information is not available.

Universal Bank

Mr. Webb: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, pursuant to his answer of 21 October 2002 to the hon. Member for Harwich, Official Report, column 14, on the Universal Bank, what alternative arrangements he will put in place for those people who will not be able to use the PIN number associated with a Post Office card account. [77785]

Malcolm Wicks: Customers will be able to choose from a range of account options. For some people the Post Office card account may not be the most suitable option and they may prefer to use an account with a cheque book or pass book. Customers will be supplied with information which clearly sets out their account options and which will enable them to decide which is right for them.

Customers who do want a Post Office card account but are unable to cope with a PIN number will have the option of nominating someone else to collect their money for them. In these cases, a second card will be issued.

We have always recognised that there will be a small group of people who cannot be paid directly into an account. We will develop an alternative method to pay this group of benefit recipients.

HOUSE OF COMMONS COMMISSION

Modernisation

Mr. Andrew Turner: To ask the hon. Member for Roxburgh and Berwickshire, representing the House of Commons Commission, if he will make an assessment of the effect of changes to the sitting hours of the House on the working conditions and remuneration of servants thereof. [77435]

Mr. Kirkwood: As the financial and employing authority of the House, the Commission has been giving careful consideration to the possible effects of these proposals. The extent of the changes will depend on the decisions of the House on motions which are to be debated tomorrow. In turn, the effects of the changes will be determined by how the House, Committees and Members adapt to any new arrangements: for example, in the sitting times of Select Committees and the use of Library and catering facilities. The Commission is

28 Oct 2002 : Column 649W

mindful of its obligations as an employer, and has already asked the Board of Management to assess effects on staff as any changes come into force.

HEALTH

Bed Blocking

Mr. Key: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many beds were blocked in Salisbury district hospital in each month since January 2001. [77313]

Ms Blears: Information on delayed discharges has been collected at health authority rather than individual trust level, on a quarterly basis. As of Quarter 1 of 2002–03 this information will be collected quarterly at primary care trust level. All available information has been placed in the Library.

The Government recognises that delayed discharges are a problem across the south. Health and local authorities are working together to take action to improve the situation. In October 2001 the Government announced an extra #300 million in the Xcash for change" initiative to tackle delayed transfers of care. Last year Wiltshire received over #700,000, this year over #2 million.

Mr. Flook: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many beds were blocked in Taunton and Somerset NHS Trust beds in each month since January 2001. [77761]

Ms Blears: Information on delayed discharges has been collected at health authority rather than individual trust level, on a quarterly basis. As of Quarter 1 of 2002–03 this information will be collected quarterly at primary care trust level. All available information has been placed in the Library.

The Government recognises that delayed discharges are a problem across the south. Health and local authorities are working together to take action to improve the situation. In October 2001 the Government announced an extra #300 million in the 'Cash for

28 Oct 2002 : Column 650W

Change' initiative to tackle delayed transfers of care. Last year Somerset received over #700,000, this year over #1.5 million.

Blood Products

Brian Cotter: To ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will make available to the House the findings of his Department's inquiry relating to Lord Owen's period as a Minister at the Department in relation to blood products used for transfusion. [76822]

Ms Blears: I have now instigated a comprehensive review of papers from the period in question, which is estimated to be completed early in the new year. The findings from the review will be made available to the House.

Breast Cancer

Mr. Simmonds: To ask the Secretary of State for Health if he will publish the statistics on the incidence rate of breast cancer for (a) Lincolnshire and (b) each county in England, Wales and Northern Ireland in each of the last 10 years for (i) men and (ii) women. [74922]

Ruth Kelly: I have been asked to reply.

The answer requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician. I have asked him to reply.

Letter from Mr. Cook to Mr. Mark Simmonds dated 28 October 2002:




Table 1: Age standardised incidence rate for breast cancer(22), females, English counties(23) and Wales, years of registration 1991 to 1999.
Rate per 100,000 population(24)

Area199119921993199419951996199719981999
Bedfordshire(25) 1051271071061129414412698
Berkshire(25) 114113107116114123120124122
Bristol/Bath area11099979810498113116126
Buckinghamshire(25) 118122116118117138130127131
Cambridgeshire(25) 135114109121101110111112128
Cheshire(25) 106103989311010099102113
Cornwall (and Isles of Scilly)9410089117116108123115132
Cumbria8710193948710597107105
Derbyshire(25) 113104101106100101106107113
Devon(25) 10410810693104104113121127
Dorset(25) 116118133141122135136125153
Durham(25) 9787829992114109113109
East Sussex(25) 10611410694111115124109113
Essex1059993107111108124113118
Gloucestershire10811910296106102101121151
Greater London (Metropolitan county)10210598100108106119116114
Greater Manchester (Metropolitan county)100104102102105109107114114
Hampshire(25) 106114125125121117125115110
Herefordshire and Worcestershire(25) 97118110116101114124115112
Hertfordshire10993123112120124145131130
Isle of Wight(25) 10711497131114156171152135
Kent(25) 11011694103107107119113117
Lancashire(25) 1021079811110497105108110
Leicestershire(25) 981101079489869898113
Lincolnshire114119951061079897125117
Merseyside (Metropolitan county)1059795101104101100104103
Norfolk110104111107110115117107125
North Yorkshire(25) 10410486100103108116115120
Northamptonshire115127100119112127117116126
Northumberland94979875656962107107
Nottinghamshire(25) 991071099210010410110399
Oxfordshire126141124132115126117127145
Shropshire(25) 110128115110112113102108125
Somerset1141161389793100108118143
South Yorkshire (Metropolitan county)108106979791929896111
Staffordshire(25) 10598989410998110105103
Suffolk10599101119109108110118120
Surrey105109110107119113130115125
Tees Valley less Darlington87879193100105107104100
The Humber100941019710710210594108
Tyne and Wear (Metropolitan county)95998387809195109104
Warwickshire10611110211510193116116112
West Midlands (Metropolitan county)10910610199101101100112110
West Sussex949693105114114118127114
West Yorkshire (Metropolitan county)951031041009896108110110
Wiltshire(25) 100136132113116128130119136
Wales97117120124105105110102120

(22) For years 1991 to 1994, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9), code 174. For years 1995 to 1999, International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10), code C50.

(23) Data are presented for English counties, and former counties, based on boundaries as at 1 April 2002.

(24) Rates are based on mid-year population estimates produced following the 1991 Census.

(25) Former county of.

Note:

Age standardisation is to the European Standard Population.

Source:

Office for National Statistics


28 Oct 2002 : Column 651W

Table 2: Number of new cases of breast cancer(26), males, England and Wales, years of registration 1991 to 1999
Number

YearEnglandWales
199118913
199217813
199322420
199416618
199521219
199619223
199723012
199826513
199927219

(26) For years 1991 to 1994, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, code 175. For years 1995 to 1999, International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, code C50.

Source:

Office for National Statistics


Mr. Simmonds: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what was the death rate from breast cancer in (a) Lincolnshire and (b) each county in England, Wales and Northern Ireland in each of the last 10 years for (i) men and (ii) women. [74923]

28 Oct 2002 : Column 652W

Ruth Kelly: I have been asked to reply. The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician. I have asked him to reply.

Letter from Len Cook to Mr. Mark Simmonds dated 28 October 2002:




28 Oct 2002 : Column 653W

Table 1: Age standardised mortality rate for deaths with an underlying cause of breast cancer(27), females, English counties(28) and Wales, 1992 to 2001(29)
Rate per 100,000 population

Area1992199319941995199619971998199920002001
Bedfordshire 38354039343434272532
Berkshire42403544343539333233
Bristol / Bath area41383636323434323433
Buckinghamshire45393741313441373538
Cambridgeshire 41454441303637293531
Cheshire43393832343232322732
Cornwall (and Isle of Scilly)36373343363731303228
Cumbria36333235353334363729
Derbyshire41434141383731293033
Devon40403937363333273332
Dorset42343838263533303325
Durham34363533383529302829
East Sussex35374038343736313232
Essex40413841383237323430
Gloucestershire37343841364034353532
Greater London (Metropolitan County)40393734363532323332
Greater Manchester (Metropolitan38383737363331353232
County)
Hampshire41383634363636363330
Herefordshire and Worcestershire40393738373732383329
Hertfordshire33393842353641363535
Isle of Wight39333527213434372327
Kent43444037333133333233
Lancashire34363739333332312932
Leicestershire36394042333327283128
Lincolnshire43403941343732323235
Merseyside(Metropolitan County)37363635363835353231
Norfolk36373635363737343329
North Yorkshire40362930383031343630
Northamptonshire40394240383336333431
Northumberland42344627362934312833
Nottinghamshire46364038373637332735
Oxfordshire39363337333040333328
Shropshire40413638364335333630
Somerset36403736363532303129
South Yorkshire (Metropolitan38394436393531332932
County)
Staffordshire40404042403136343227
Suffolk42444339333736323129
Surrey40423933293428342929
Tees Valley less Darlington39374135343632273330
The Humber38383835433333302929
Tyne and Wear (Metropolitan County)41404035313737333130
Warwickshire48373639423135293127
West Midlands (Metropolitan County)40373935373733343228
West Sussex39363633362738323430
West Yorkshire (Metropolitan County)35353434313028292828
Wiltshire38413738413935352832
Wales39403936363534343432

(27) For years 1992 to 2000, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9), code 174 For 2001, International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10), code C50

(28) Data are presented for English counties, and former counties, based on boundaries as at 1st April 2002.

(29) The introduction of ICD-10 for coding cause of death in 2001 means that the number of deaths for this year are not comparable with data for earlier years.

Research has shown that the Introduction of ICD-10 led to an apparent increase of 2.7 per cent. in the number of deaths coded to female breast cancer.

Rates for the years 1993 to 2000 have therefore been adjusted by 2.7 per cent. to produce comparable trends for this period.

Data for 1992 are not adjusted because of coding changes introduced in 1993.

(30) Rates for 2001 are based on mid-year population estimates produced following the 2001 Census.

Rates for earlier years are based on mid-year population estimates produced following the 1991 Census.

There is therefore a discontinuity in this time series. ONS will publish revised sub-national population estimates for 1991 to 2000 in February 2003.

Age-standardisation is to the European Standard Population

Source:

Office for National Statistics


28 Oct 2002 : Column 655W

Table 2: Number of deaths with an underlying cause of breast cancer(31), males, England and Wales, 1992 to 2001(32)
Number

YearEnglandWales
1992857
1993816
1994825
1995746
1996634
1997652
1998732
1999632
2000683
2001773

(31) For years 1992 to 2000, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9), code 175.For 2001, International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10), code C50

(32) The introduction of ICD-10 led to an apparent increase of 10 per cent. in the number of deaths coded to make breast cancer.The figures should therefore be interpreted with caution.

Source:

Office for National Statistics


Mr. Wray: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how much has been spent on raising awareness of breast cancer since 1997; what progress has been made in cutting the number of deaths from breast cancer since 1997; and what care is available to people who suffer emotionally from the removal of a breast after treatment for breast cancer. [74406]

Ms Blears: We congratulate the charities that work together on breast cancer awareness month and their efforts to raise awareness of the disease. In addition to these efforts, the Government have spent approximately #10,000 on a breast awareness teaching kit for primary care in conjunction with the European Community and the cancer research campaign. #38,500 has also been spent nationally on XBe Breast Aware" leaflets and #131,000 on information leaflets for women about breast screening.

There has been a 6 per cent. reduction in deaths from breast cancer between 1997 and 2000. The annual numbers of deaths in England has decreased from 11,240 in 1997 to 10,609 in 2000. Over the same period the age standardised death rate for breast cancer has fallen by 7.7 per cent. from 1997 to 2000.

The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) is due to publish guidelines on supportive and palliative care in October 2002. This will include guidance on information, communication and psychological and social support. The NICE guidance is now available for consultation on the NICE website at www.nice.org.uk.

The Patient Cancer Survey 1999–2000 found that women with breast cancer reported generally positive experiences of breast cancer services.


Next Section Index Home Page