Terminology
4. We are aware that the proper definition of terrorism
has frequently been disputed. Indeed we understand that a failure
to agree on a definition of terrorism has been one of the principal
factors holding up progress in the United Nations (UN) on the
Indian proposal for a convention on global terrorism. For the
purposes of this report we have been guided by the definitions
of terrorism in UK and US law. Since this report arises out of
the attacks of 11 September we have addressed terrorism in its
international context, what has been categorised as 'strategic
terrorism'.[6]
We have focussed on terrorism with militant Islamist roots, particularly
as represented by al Qaeda. We have not considered either domestic
or Irish terrorism.
5. The definition of terrorism in the Terrorism Act
2000 is complicated but essentially it provides that terrorism
is the use, or threat, of action which is violent, damaging or
disrupting and is intended to influence the government or intimidate
the public and is for the purpose of advancing a political, religious
or ideological cause. The Act also proscribed a number of terrorist
groups, and actions taken for their benefit are treated under
the Act as actions taken for the purposes of terrorism. This definition
has not been altered by the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security
Bill currently before Parliament.
6. On 12 October 2001 President Bush signed Executive
Order 13224-Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions with
Persons who Commit, Threaten to Commit or Support Terrorism. In
that order terrorism is defined as an activity that
i. involves a violent act or an act dangerous
to human life, property, or infrastructure; and
ii. appears to be intended
a. to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
b. to influence the policy of a government by
intimidation or coercion; or
c. to affect the conduct of a government by mass
destruction, assassination, kidnapping, or hostage-taking.
Al Qaeda is proscribed under the UK's Terrorism Act[7]
and under the US Executive Order.
4