Annex 3
COMPARISON OF EMISSIONS FROM KILNS, WITH
AND WITHOUT ALTERNATIVE FUEL USE
CASTLE CEMENT, KETTON NO 8 KILNWITH
AND WITHOUT CEMFUEL
|
Substance | Actual emissions coal only mg/Nm3
| Actual emissions coal/Cemfuel/Profuel mg/Nm3
|
|
Particulate matter | 45.5
| 25.9 |
Sulphur Dioxide | 30.6
| 12.0 |
Oxides of Nitrogen | 1,131
| 626 |
HCI | 1.24
| 1.26 |
HF | 0.23 |
0.12 |
Mercury | 0.0020
| 0.0024 |
Group II metals | 0.0053
| 0.0257* |
Group III metals | 0.0638
| 0.04674 |
Dioxins and Furans* ng/Nm3 TEQ |
0.003 | 0.0075
|
VOC | 19 |
24.8 |
|
All emission limits and values are reported correct to dry
basis 11 per cent oxygen.
Table 2.2
RUGBY CEMENT, BARRINGTON WORKSWITH AND WITHOUT
PETCOKE
Substances (all measured in mg/m3 unless stated
otherwise)
| Limits for Continuous Emission Monitors Release Point No A1
| When burning coal/ petcoke only, and up to 15% SLF Monthly
meanActual daily
mean
| When burning coal/ petcoke with SLF, (15.1% to 40%) Monthly
mean
|
Actual dailymean | |
| | |
Sulphur Dioxide | 1,900
| 2,300 | 1,200
| 1,400 |
Particulates | 50
| 100 | 50
| 65 |
Oxides of Nitrogen (as NO2) | 1,800
| 2,500 | 1,500
| 2,100 |
Carbon Monoxide | 100
| 150 | 100
| 110 |
| | |
| |
Extract from Environment Agency Authorisation AH 8735, Variation
BF 8780, relating to IPC Authorisation for Barrington Works, (Effective
date 1 September 1999).
LAFARGE CEMENT UKCOMPARISON OF FIGURES FOR FUEL
TRIALS ON BASIS OF INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL INDEX, (IEI) AND ENVIRONMENTAL
QUOTIENT (EQ) AIR
|
Works | Fuel |
Percentage
replacement | EQ Air Fuel baseline
| Improvement
with fuel |
|
Dunbar | Tyres | 25%
| 0.18 | 0.22 | 0.18
|
Westbury | Tyres | 24%
| 0.032 | 0.044 | 0.27
|
Masons | SLF | 20%
| 0.021 | 0.029 | 0.28
|
Weardale | SLF | 40%
| 0.52 | 0.58 | 0.1
|
Cauldon | Tyres | 50%
| nd | nd | Est +13%
|
|
Notes:
Dunbar tyres refers to operation with raw mill on mode, with raw mill off improvement in EQ air is +26 per cent.
Cauldon tyres refers to increase from 30 per cent to 50 per cent tyres and figure is estimated: no formal calculation required by Agency.
Weardale SLF: IEI methodology used was different at that time and hence numbers for IEI larger, using modern methodology numbers would be changed but percentage improvement same.
|
|