Select Committee on Health Memoranda


3.6 Expenditure on Prescribing

  3.6.1  Could the Department provide information on total NHS expenditure on pharmaceuticals for the past four years, including a breakdown by sector and by generic/branded drugs? Could the Department please state what data are available on pharmaceuticals in the non primary care sector, and how they are monitoring drug spending and cost pressures in the acute hospital and community sectors? [4.10a]

  1.  Total NHS net expenditure on medicines and listed appliances in England in 2001-02 was £7,356 million. £5,703 million of this total relates to prescriptions dispensed in the community and £1,653 million relates to medicines supplied in a secondary care setting (please note that these are provisional figures and are to be finalised).

  2.  In cash terms, total NHS net expenditure on medicines and listed appliances relating to prescriptions dispensed in the community in England in 2001-02 was £5,554 million. Cash figures for HCHS 2001-02 expenditure are not available.

  3.  Historical NHS Drug Bill expenditure figures, broken down by sector, for the financial years 1998-99 to 2001-02 is provided in table below:
Year
(Cash)
Total NHS net expenditure relating to prescriptions dispensed in the community (£m) Total NHS net expenditure relating to medicines supplied in a secondary care setting (£m) Total NHS net expenditure on medicines and listed appliances

(£m)

1998-994,3391,211 5,550
1999-20004,8331,369 6,202
2000-015,161N/A N/A
2001-025,554N/A N/A

Year (Resource)Total NHS net expenditure relating to prescriptions dispensed in the community (£m) Total NHS net expenditure relating to medicines supplied in a secondary care setting (£m) Total NHS net expenditure on medicines and listed appliances

(£m)

2000-015,1581,530 6,688
2001-025,7031,653 7,356


  4.  For prescriptions dispensed in the community in England, a breakdown between branded medicines, generic medicines, dressings and listed appliances for the financial years 1992-93 to 2001-02 is provided in Table 3.6.1. The table shows both the cost (expressed in terms of net ingredient cost) and the volume (number of prescription items) for each category. In 2001-02, branded drugs dispensed represent about 78 per cent of the total net ingredient cost (inc. the cost of dressings and appliances). In 2001-02, the share of prescription items written generically was 72 per cent, and the share of prescription items dispensed generically was 51 per cent.

Table 3.6.1

NUMBER AND NET INGREDIENT COST OF GENERIC AND PROPRIETAR PRESCRIPTION ITEMS DISPENSED IN THE COMMUNITY

1992-93 TO 2001-02

England
Drugs dispensed generically Drugs dispensed as proprietary Dressings and Appliance


NICPrescription items NICPrescription items NICPrescription items
Financial Year(£m) (m)(£m)(m) (£m)(m)
1992-93305149 2,449267173 13
1993-94   351169 2,680264190 14
1994-95   402186 2,881262205 14
1995-96   457201 3,066259216 15
1996-97   516214 3,328258228 15
1997-98   651230 3,574260240 15
1998-99   703240 3,845261251 15
1999-20001,049254 4,116265270 15
2000-011,077284 4,283261291 16
2001-021,079300 4,886275316 17

  Notes:

  1.  Source: PCA, PPA, England. Figures are for prescription items dispensed by chemists and appliance contractors and dispensing doctors including items personally administered in England, for financial years April to March. Note that in addition to prescriptions written by GPs in England, this includes those written by nurses, dentists, hospital doctors, (and, up to March 1994, armed services doctors and dentists) provided they were dispensed in the community. Also included are prescriptions written in Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man but dispensed in England. The data do not cover drugs dispensed in hospital or private prescriptions.

  2.  The net ingredient cost (NIC) is the basic cost of a drug. This cost does not take account of discounts, dispensing costs, fees or prescription charge income. All figures are expressed at outturn prices.

  3.  Generic dispensing covers drugs that are prescribed and available generically and the dispenser is reimbursed at the Drug Tariff or generic price. It is possible in some circumstances for a branded drug or parallel import to be dispensed against the prescription.

  5.  The Department collects data on secondary care prescribing through NHS Trust and Health Authority financial returns. On an annual basis, these high level aggregate returns enable it to monitor the pressure faced by local NHS organisations and the aggregate cost to the NHS as a whole. More detailed information is available to Trusts at a local level from hospital pharmacy IT systems. This is primarily used to monitor local spending on pharmaceuticals together with adherence to local policies aimed at ensuring the cost effective use of medicines.

  6.  "Pharmacy in the Future", the modernisation programme for pharmacy services in England made a commitment to implement a self-assessment tool for medicines management in NHS hospitals. The tool was developed by the Office of the Chief Pharmacist, at the Department of Health, with the support of the Regional Directors of Performance Management and Public Health and Regional Pharmaceutical Advisers. It was introduced to NHS Trust hospitals in England through a roll-out programme managed by the Regional Office (RO) network.

  7.  The self-assessment tool recognised that achieving clinical and cost-effective medicines use is an organisation-wide issue on which managers, prescribers and pharmacists need to work together. The self-assessment tool provided an opportunity for hospitals to examine their arrangements ahead of the Audit Commission's review of medicines management in Spring 2001.

  8.  Regional Offices organised meetings with Trusts in Autumn 2001 to ensure action plans were in place to improve performance.

  9.  The Audit Commission published their report "A Spoonful of Sugar" in December 2001. The report complements the Department's medicines management performance framework.

  10.  Work is in hand to develop the next stage of the framework. The next wave will focus on implementation of action plans and the greater use of automation and IT. The central aim is to ensure that clinicians, pharmacists and financial planners work more closely together across local health economies.

3.6  Expenditure on Prescribing

  3.6.2  Could the Department provide information on (i) total Family Health Services expenditure on prescribing for each year from 1992-93 to 2001-02, (ii) the average expenditure per capita, (iii) the total number of items prescribed and average number per capita, and (iv) the average cost per prescription? Any commentary, which the Department would wish to append would be welcome, including an assessment of progress in meeting its stated target of restraining the growth in the drugs bill to sustainable and affordable limits. In particular, could the Department provide an update on the measures being taken to control NHS expenditure on generic drugs in primary care following the price increases in 1999-2000? [4.10b-c]

  1.  The information requested is shown in Table 3.6.2

Table 3.6.2

NUMBER AND NET INGREDIENT COST OF PRESCRIPTION ITEMS DISPENSED IN THE COMMUNITY

1992-93 TO 2001-02
England
Financial year
NIC NIC/HeadPrescription
items
Items/HeadNIC/Item
(£m)(£) (m)(£)
1992-932,92660 4308.96.81
1993-943,22266 4479.27.20
1994-953,48972 4639.57.54
1995-963,73976 4749.77.88
1996-974,07283 4879.98.37
1997-984,46591 50510.28.85
1998-994,79997 51610.49.30
1999-20005,435109 53410.710.18
2000-015,651113 56111.210.07
2001-026,281125 59211.810.61

  Notes:

  1.  Source: PCA, PPA, England. Figures are for prescription items dispensed by chemists and appliance contractors and dispensing doctors including items personally administered in England, for financial years April to March. Note that that in addition to prescriptions written by GPs in England, this includes those written by nurses, dentists, hospital doctors, (and, up to March 1994, armed services doctors and dentists) provided they were dispensed in the community. Also included are prescriptions written in Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man but dispensed in England. The data do not cover drugs dispensed in hospital or private prescriptions.

  2.  The net ingredient cost (NIC) is the basic cost of a drug. This cost does not take account of discounts, dispensing costs, fees or prescription charge income. All figures are expressed at outturn prices.

  3.  Population figures are based on ONS 1998 based mid-year population projections of the resident England population (all ages).

Progress in Restraining the Drugs Bill

  2.  Since 1999-2000 funding for hospital and community health services, prescribing and discretionary general medical services have been brought together into a single funding stream at Health Authority and Primary Care Group level. Unified allocations enable Health Authorities and Primary Care Groups to deploy resources flexibly to best meet the health needs of their population. In 2001-02 it is for Health Authorities in partnership with Primary Care Groups and other local stakeholders to determine how best to use their funds to meet national and local priorities for improving health, tackling health inequalities and modernising services. However, with the introduction of Shifting the Balance of Power, from 2002-03 onwards it will be for Primary Care Trusts to deploy resources and work in collaboration with other local stakeholders to determine how best to use their funds to meet national and local priorities for improving health, tackling health inequalities and modernising services.

  3.  Average growth in the FHS cash drugs bill over the last five years has been 8 per cent per annum. Considerable effort was put into ensuring clinical and cost effective prescribing through for example, prescribing incentive schemes and the provision of quality advice and support to prescribers. New and innovative medicines often offer the most cost-effective form of treatment so the Government does not necessarily view growth at this level (or any other level) as a bad thing. In resource terms, 2001-02 growth in prescribing expenditure over the preceding year was around 10.7 per cent and largely reflects the implementation of Government priorities set out in National Service Frameworks.

  4.  A new Pharmaceutical Price Regulation Scheme (PPRS) was agreed in 1999 with the Association of British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI). The scheme, which will run for five years, began in October 1999, with all suppliers being required to reduce the prices of all products covered by the scheme by 4.5 per cent. The price reduction is achieving savings to the NHS drugs bill in excess of £230 million a year. See question 3.6.3 for more detail.

  5.  Progress has been made on other key initiatives. Around 23,000 nurses with a district nurse or health visitor qualification have been trained to prescribe from a limited formulary of drugs and appliances (the Nurse Prescribers' Formulary for District Nurses and Health Visitors). This enables them to manage a range of specified medical conditions—minor ailments, minor injuries, health promotion and palliative care. Following training, independent nurse prescribers under the extended scheme will be able to prescribe all General Sales List and Pharmacy medicines currently prescribable by GPs at NHS expense, together with an agreed list of Prescription Only Medicines (the Nurse Prescribers' Extended Formulary). The first nurses began training to prescribe from the Extended Formulary in January 2002, and by 30 June 2002 over 500 nurses had either completed or were undergoing the training course. In addition the Department of Health and Medicines Control Agency have completed a joint public consultation on the introduction of supplementary prescribing by nurses and pharmacists following initial diagnosis by a doctor. The aim is to have a training programme for nurse supplementary prescribers in place by the end of 2002, and for pharmacists during 2003. The contribution of general practitioners to quality prescribing is being recognised through additional remuneration as part of the Sustained Quality Prescribing Scheme announced in April (HSC 1999-107). Every practitioner in a practice which qualifies for the payment, in accordance with a number of benchmarks, among which is the requirement to use a formulary or an increase in generic prescribing, will receive an additional annual payment.

  6.  Measures continue to improve rational prescribing by GPs and towards eliminating unwarranted variations in prescribing. The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) continues to promote the clinical and cost effectiveness of medicines through its technology appraisals, clinical guidelines and audit tools.

  7.  The National Prescribing Centre (NPC) and the Prescribing Support Unit (PSU) have continued to provide support to medical and pharmaceutical advisors via bulletins and through the provision of analytical services.

  8.  The PRODIGY programme of work continues to be developed and make progress to improve rational prescribing.

  9.  A survey carried out in June 2001 estimated that 80 per cent of practices have clinical systems installed that could support PRODIGY. Of these GPs who could use PRODIGY, 14 per cent did so in order to support the care process, involve patients in the decision-making, up-date their own knowledge—all providing practical support for clinical governance. The education and communication programme continues to support GPs in their uptake and use of PRODIGY, demonstrating an increase in both awareness and use in twelve months.

  10.  The clinical content in PRODIGY continues to be updated to ensure clinicians have up-to-date evidence-based information on their desktops. Between July 2001 and July 2002 revisions to 101 guidance topics were completed, and the number of topics was expanded to 141 in total. The system continues to integrate primary care guidance developed by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE), and guidelines published by the Public Health Laboratory Service (PHLS) on potential bio-terrorist attacks. Three new topics are also being developed to support independent nurse prescribing.

  11.  PRODIGY continues to develop, not only to encompass more conditions, but also to offer more comprehensive, patient specific support for clinical decision-making, and the application of national protocols for the treatment of all major conditions. A research phase, testing a revised prototype, which helps clinicians manage patients with chronic diseases (such as heart disease), has recently been completed in partnership with GPs, practices and the suppliers of clinical computer systems.

  12.  The contribution of general practitioners to quality prescribing is being recognised through payment of the Sustained Quality Allowance. This allowance is paid when all of seven benchmarks are achieved, including increase in generic prescribing or the use of a formulary. All Primary Care Trusts employ teams of prescribing advisers, mainly pharmacists, having a common aim to encourage and secure rational and cost-effective prescribing.

  13.  Present and possible future measures to secure value for money and security of supply of generic medicines for the NHS are covered below.

Measures being taken to control NHS expenditure on generic drugs in primary care following the price increases in 1999-2000

  14.  The maximum price scheme introduced in August 2000 was rolled forward unchanged on 18 October 2001. It is saving the NHS some £330 million a year compared to the expenditure that would have been incurred if prices had remained at March 2000 levels.

  15.  The Department published a Discussion Paper "Options for the Future Supply and Reimbursement of Generic Medicines for the NHS" in July 2001 which set out options for the longer term, which if implemented could replace the maximum price scheme. Since then the Department has discussed these and other options with representative bodies of the generics manufacturers, wholesalers and community pharmacies. The objective is to find a longer term solution that meets the Government's objective and is acceptable to the generics' supply chain. The Department has concluded that it should consider longer term solutions for generics reimbursement in the context of issues that could affect community pharmacy more generally such as the outcome of the OFT review of control of entry. As a result decisions on longer term reimbursement arrangements for generics are unlikely to be taken until later in the year.

3.6  Expenditure on Prescribing

  3.6.3  Could the Department give an update on progress in getting the pharmaceutical industry to reduce drug costs by 4.5 per cent (as agreed in the PPRS)? Could the Department comment on issues such as volume, price and substitution? Has monitoring information improved since last year, and has this helped cost control? [4.10d]

  1.  The Department has continued to monitor the delivery of the 4.5 per cent price cut which companies were required to make from 1st October 1999. As reported last year the PPRS agreement allows companies to achieve the reduction by an across-the-board reduction or by modulation (variable reductions to the prices of different products provided that the overall effect is a price reduction of 4.5 per cent). Companies that opt for the latter route submit annually independently audited output data. The Department has analysed the returns submitted by companies up to 31 December 2001 to ensure that the overall 4.5 per cent price reduction is being delivered.

  2.  The price reduction is achieving savings in excess of £230 million a year.

  3.  Following turbulence in the generics market in 1999-2000 the Department of Health put in place a statutory maximum price scheme covering the main generics in August 2000, which was rolled forward unchanged on 18 October 2001. This brought stability to the market and meant in 2001-02 the growth in price (cost per item) had returned to a similar level as the average growth in price in the 3 years previous to 1999-00 (see Table 3.6.2). Question 3.6.2 also gives further information about recent developments in relation to the supply and reimbursement of generics.

  4.  The problems in the generic market in 1999-00 did also lead to prescription processing problems at the Prescription Pricing Authority (PPA) and therefore to delays in the availability of up-to-date prescribing information. The PPA introduced a recovery strategy to reduce the delays and by November 2001 were back to a normal processing timetable. This meant that up to date prescribing information was available to the Department of Health and NHS and that prescribing expenditure could be monitored and forecasted more effectively.

  5.  The volume of prescription items (for both generic and branded prescription items) increased in 2001-02 by 5.4 per cent. The average growth over the previous three years was 3.6 per cent (see Table 3.6.2).

3.6  Expenditure on Prescribing

  3.6.4  Could the Department provide estimates of the likely costs of NICE recommendations for the current financial year?

  1.  The information requested is shown in Table 3.6.4

  As at 16 August 2002

Table 3.6.4

ESTIMATED COSTS OF NICE GUIDANCE


Title of guidance
Date of issue
Estimated
full-year

costs

(England, £m)

Comment
Completed appraisals

1
Wisdom teeth March 2000 -4.7
2 Hip replacement April 2000 -7.6
3 Taxanes for ovarian cancer May 2000 6.6
4 Coronary artery stents May 2000 n/a
5 Liquid based cytology June 2000 n/a
6 Taxanes for breast cancer June 2000 15.1
7 Proton Pump Inhibitors July 2000 -42.5


8


Hearing aids


July 2000


n/a
9 Rosiglitazone for Type II Diabetes August 2000 0.0 Original estimate was 14.5, but this was in effect superseded by the later estimate for the two glitazones together in the pioglitazone appraisal.
10 Inhaler systems for under 5s August 2000 n/a
11 Implantable cardioverter defibrillators September 2000 26.0 This assumes an offset of £15-20m to gross costs of £45m
12 Glycoprotein IIB/IIIA inhibitors September 2000 28.6
13 Ritalin for ADHD October 2000 19.8 NICE made separate estimates of the year 1 drug and associated running costs, and of the cost of initial assessment of potentially eligible patients.
14 Ribivirin and interferon alpha for Hepatitis C October 2000 17.3 £55m spread over three years to clear the prevalent cases, then reducing to £5m pa.
15 Zanamivir for influenza November 2000 6.6
16 Autologous cartilage transplantation in knee joints December 2000 n/a
17 Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer January 2001 n/a
18 Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia December 2000 n/a


19
Donepezil, rivastigmine and glantamine for Alzheimer's January 2001 39.7 This is the long-run annual cost—NICE expected a slow build-up over several years
20 Riluzole for motor neurone disease January 2001 4.7


21
Pioglitazone for Type II diabetes March 2001 -11.3 See comment on rosiglitazone above.
22 Orlistat for obesity March 2001 9.0 £6m for drug costs and £3-4m for overheads
23 Temozolomide for brain cancer April 2001 0.9
24 Difficult to heal surgical wounds April 2001 n/a


25
Gemcitabine for pancreatic cancer May 2001 1.8
26 4 drugs for non-small cell lung cancer June 2001 9.0 These are the short-run costs—NICE comment that take-up may increase in the longer term.
27 Cox II for osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis July 2001 23.6


28
Topotecan for advanced ovarian cancer August 2001 6.6


29
Fludarabine for B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia September 2001 0.0 Estimated to be broadly cost neutral—no detailed costings given.
30 Taxanes for breast cancer - review September 2001 0.0 Earlier guidance unchanged
31 Sibutramine for obesity in adults October 2001 18.1 Year 3 figure
32 Beta interferon & glatiramer for MS January 2002 n/a
33 3 drugs for advanced colorectal cancer March 2002 38.7 Upper bound (no lower bound given).
34 Trastuzumab for advanced breast cancer March 2002 16.0
35 Etanercept for juvenile arthritis March 2002 2.8


36
Etanercept and infliximab for rheumatoid arthritis March 2002 59.0
37 Rituximab—non-Hodkin's lymphoma March 2002 NICE do not attempt a quantative estimate, but information in the guidance suggests a figure of around £1m.
38 Inhaler Systems for children 5-15 years March 2002 0.9
39 Nicotine replacement therapy & Zyban March 2002 38.7
40 Infliximab for Crohn's disease May 2002 1.6 NICE estimated £2.5m for the first year costs. They expected lower costs in subsequent years but did not quantify.
41 Routine anti-D prophylaxis May 2002 3.8
42 Human growth hormone in children May 2002 44.3 Upper bound (no lower bound given).
43 Atypical antipsychotics June 2002 104.8
44 Metal on metal hip resurfacing June 2002 1.9 NICE say cost is more likely to be at lower end of range.
45 Caelyx for advanced ovarian cancer July 2002 2.9
46 Surgery for the morbidly obese July 2002 12.7 This is long-run cost—NICE suggest £1.7m in year 1.

Total costs for all guidance to date 495.7

  2.  The estimated full-year costs of all NICE appraisal guidance issued so far, relatively to previous levels of NHS spending where appropriate, amount to some £495.7 million for England (see Table 3.6.4). In some cases the financial impact on the NHS may build up gradually over a number of years, for instance where infrastructural changes are needed to put the recommendations into full effect. In addition, there will be some costs arising out of appraisals due to be completed during the current year.

  Notes:

  1.  All estimates are based on figures published in NICE's appraisal guidance.

  2.  Where the NICE estimate is given as a range, a central value (usually the mid-point of the range) is taken.

  3.  NICE estimates are usually given on an England and Wales basis. For this table, they have been pro-rated to an England basis using appropriate population factors (Source: ONS and NICE guidance)

  4.  Where appropriate, estimates represent the additional impact of NICE's recommendations relative to the immediately previous level of NHS spending on treatments for the condition in question.


3.6  EXPENDITURE ON PRESCRIBING

  3.6.5  Could the Department provide figures for the amount of money spent on statins per year over each of the last four years, if possible broken down by Trust and Health Authority.

  1.  The information requested is shown in Table 3.6.5

Table 3.6.5

BNF SECTION 2.12 TOTAL ACTUAL COST AND NUMBER OF ITEMS
1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02

Total
Actual
Cost
(£000s)
Number
of items
(000s)
Total
Actual
Cost
(£000s)
Number
of items
(000s)
Total
Actual
Cost
(£000s)

Number
of items
(000s)
Total
Actual
Cost
(£000s)
Number
of items
(000s)
ENGLAND187,347.1 6,420.5242,178.2 8,434.8316,902.0 11,067.2420,021.9 14,353.0
HEALTH AUTHORITY
AVON3,378.1102.0 4,194.1129.95,419.4 168.07,232.2218.4
BARKING & HAVERING1,479.6 50.72,012.568.4 2,632.087.73,447.9 112.0
BARNET,ENFIELD & HARINGEY3,006.1 98.13,906.9127.1 4,950.1161.96,502.0 206.3
BARNSLEY1,033.145.4 1,315.057.91,656.2 70.92,383.993.5
BEDFORDSHIRE1,515.153.5 1,891.368.82,488.0 90.43,301.5117.3
BERKSHIRE2,395.876.0 2,973.297.93,709.5 124.84,891.9166.5
BEXLEY,BROMLEY & GREENWICH2,962.8 86.83,604.0104.9 4,499.6129.45,705.2 158.7
BIRMINGHAM2,948.1104.8 3,910.6140.64,994.2 180.86,520.8230.6
BRADFORD1,762.863.8 2,174.678.82,828.3 100.94,075.7138.8
BRENT & HARROW1,518.2 45.02,171.662.1 3,201.686.74,204.1 109.4
BUCKINGHAMSHIRE2,120.0 62.82,572.977.2 3,273.097.54,285.9 124.7
BURY & ROCHDALE1,819.1 64.42,248.681.3 2,775.4100.63,542.3 125.6
CALDERDALE, KIRKLEES2,862.4 86.23,533.8108.1 4,469.0137.35,791.4 178.0
CAMBRIDGESHIRE2,490.6 97.73,317.3131.3 4,239.0168.35,351.8 210.9
CAMDEN & ISLINGTON1,301.8 34.21,671.943.0 2,079.151.52,593.5 63.2
CORNWALL & SCILLY2,349.6 85.32,826.9106.9 3,560.3143.24,686.8 186.2
COUNTY DURHAM & DARLINGTON2,552.5 91.03,456.5123.1 4,558.8162.66,077.9 210.1
COVENTRY765.729.3 1,197.345.01,769.1 67.02,581.296.8
CROYDON966.429.3 1,177.436.21,661.8 49.92,287.268.1
DONCASTER1,216.856.9 1,698.381.92,265.0 108.43,027.6141.9
DORSET3,279.5114.7 3,895.6141.04,700.0 174.75,894.3218.6
DUDLEY1,169.536.2 1,489.046.81,909.8 60.02,500.476.5
EALG, HSMITH, HNSLOW2,721.3 70.13,450.689.4 4,405.1115.55,510.3 142.1
EAST KENT3,435.4114.9 4,544.1156.25,948.6 198.97,590.8244.0
EAST LANCASHIRE2,403.2 91.63,128.8120.6 3,986.9155.65,373.4 204.9
EAST LONDON & CITY1,799.8 52.12,555.673.5 3,541.5101.84,596.3 130.9
EAST RIDING AND HULL1,848.4 73.42,624.8106.8 3,632.1151.34,811.9 198.3
EAST SURREY1,452.941.2 1,848.252.22,415.4 67.43,218.288.3
EAST SUSS,B/TON.HOVE3,090.2 100.14,023.9130.4 5,263.2171.77,119.2 221.6
G/HEAD & SOUTH TYNE1,417.5 52.21,858.769.2 2,479.090.23,507.3 122.8
GLOUCESTERSHIRE2,246.7 70.72,624.088.8 3,292.4114.74,419.0 150.7
HEREFORDSHIRE631.324.3 801.729.41,046.5 36.51,341.844.2
HERTFORDSHIRE3,758.6 112.44,676.7143.1 5,870.4183.17,621.6 240.4
HILLINGDON854.530.2 1,057.138.41,413.1 50.81,952.867.9
IOW,PORTSMOUTH & SE HAMPS2,270.2 70.72,917.493.5 3,990.5128.75,665.1 175.2
KENS, CHELSEA, WESTM1,082.4 27.01,466.437.2 1,973.650.62,535.5 64.4
KINGSTON & RICHMOND1,145.1 32.81,528.045.5 1,988.862.02,455.6 75.7
LBETH, S/WARK, LSHAM2,220.1 60.22,832.177.5 3,576.498.64,638.7 129.7
LEEDS3,766.2130.9 4,507.9158.95,497.7 195.06,945.5243.8
LEICESTERSHIRE2,704.3 92.23,428.6120.4 4,541.4160.45,751.6 202.1
LINCOLNSHIRE2,140.388.6 2,984.0127.44,226.4 190.26,071.5268.9
LIVERPOOL1,977.773.0 2,640.295.83,594.0 130.54,883.4171.2
MANCHESTER2,015.173.2 2,626.897.53,413.1 125.74,418.0160.5
MERTON, SUTTON, WAND2,220.2 63.22,823.380.9 3,617.4104.84,690.7 133.6
MORECAMBE BAY1,556.0 55.61,961.471.8 2,508.494.63,243.0 123.0
NEWCASTLE & NTH TYNE1,773.8 71.42,349.496.6 3,230.0129.44,692.3 176.4
NORFOLK2,849.3101.5 3,908.2143.95,225.7 199.66,764.1253.1
NORTH & EAST DEVON1,544.0 56.22,055.575.5 2,705.298.23,869.8 132.2
NORTH & MID HANTS1,776.0 53.62,243.069.9 2,749.387.63,565.3 109.9
NORTH CHESHIRE1,810.8 61.42,221.777.8 2,865.4102.03,880.9 134.8
NORTH CUMBRIA1,316.1 43.71,774.260.0 2,428.081.73,592.5 110.5
NORTH DERBYSHIRE1,349.1 48.31,828.967.6 2,490.592.73,274.2 121.9
NORTH ESSEX2,793.0105.3 3,798.8145.35,000.5 196.26,640.6255.4
NORTH NOTTINGHAMSHIRE1,476.4 62.81,895.081.3 2,532.7109.33,352.8 140.8
NORTH STAFFORDSHIRE1,384.0 52.61,943.374.2 2,805.4106.53,874.5 144.4
NORTH YORKSHIRE2,637.3 92.83,388.9122.8 4,366.6158.65,598.6 200.7
NORTHAMPTONSHIRE1,890.0 75.72,237.392.2 2,856.6122.53,912.5 162.8
NORTHUMBERLAND1,265.1 45.41,662.260.2 2,161.678.02,992.6 105.4
NOTTINGHAM1,869.166.8 2,754.798.63,966.5 140.85,398.2185.9
NTH WEST LANCASHIRE2,187.0 86.22,918.8114.3 3,942.3151.05,187.0 197.2
OXFORDSHIRE2,057.460.5 2,606.179.93,169.2 99.24,072.1123.3
REDBRIDGE & WALTHAM1,458.5 46.52,038.662.6 2,657.378.03,360.8 95.1
ROTHERHAM973.037.4 1,330.753.21,712.1 69.12,287.090.5
S/HAMPTON & SW HAMPS1,887.2 63.72,442.784.4 3,266.6114.34,340.9 148.8
SALFORD & TRAFFORD2,255.4 85.12,906.9109.1 3,846.5144.65,137.1 190.6
SANDWELL1,074.337.4 1,446.151.71,867.5 67.92,552.990.8
SEFTON1,262.641.8 1,625.955.42,127.4 74.32,899.698.8
SHEFFIELD1,963.578.0 2,667.9108.73,579.6 146.94,562.0183.9
SHROPSHIRE1,505.247.8 1,989.964.52,664.8 85.23,541.6111.9
SOLIHULL717.427.2 960.337.41,244.9 48.91,560.860.9
SOMERSET1,999.268.3 2,551.490.03,175.1 114.54,012.0144.4
SOUTH & WEST DEVON2,478.6 80.73,115.2102.8 4,124.5136.65,451.4 175.6
SOUTH CHESHIRE3,126.3 97.43,952.5126.7 5,133.9163.36,775.6 210.2
SOUTH ESSEX2,649.282.4 3,560.9110.94,846.4 148.76,569.8194.2
SOUTH HUMBER1,223.654.0 1,703.274.52,421.9 101.23,234.8131.0
SOUTH LANCASHIRE1,274.7 52.11,622.566.7 2,159.487.02,871.2 113.5
SOUTH STAFFORDSHIRE1,949.1 70.72,603.996.5 3,321.1124.74,234.0 160.4
SOUTHERN DERBYSHIRE1,935.9 60.62,589.181.5 3,517.8108.24,653.9 140.5
ST.HELENS & KNOWSLEY1,845.3 75.42,327.895.5 2,988.4122.14,199.6 166.7
STOCKPORT1,750.067.4 2,046.079.12,544.0 98.93,146.7124.1
SUFFOLK2,494.683.1 3,292.5114.84,344.7 151.65,770.3198.6
SUNDERLAND921.834.6 1,258.547.91,848.5 66.62,749.091.9
TEES2,118.369.0 2,795.491.53,704.2 120.25,067.8158.0
WAKEFIELD1,302.749.3 1,887.369.92,566.4 92.73,325.9115.4
WALSALL961.233.1 1,172.040.51,529.3 52.62,186.574.2
WARWICKSHIRE1,658.260.4 2,127.678.52,843.3 106.93,806.4140.0
WEST KENT3,873.5143.5 5,017.4184.66,642.6 239.68,766.6305.3
WEST PENNINE1,834.972.5 2,262.991.52,888.6 115.73,883.4152.3
WEST SURREY2,368.765.2 2,962.882.63,945.5 108.45,071.5135.7
WEST SUSSEX3,323.5104.0 4,324.9135.35,634.3 173.97,515.5223.6
WIGAN & BOLTON2,624.5 102.03,348.0131.4 4,366.5167.45,635.0 208.7
WILTSHIRE2,257.073.0 2,777.193.43,537.5 120.94,653.2158.9
WIRRAL2,342.882.2 2,765.199.43,467.8 127.34,584.7166.1
WOLVERHAMPTON652.621.2 860.128.21,152.6 39.51,666.956.0
WORCESTERSHIRE1,654.3 54.32,109.171.2 2,874.594.84,032.2 125.7

  Notes:

  1.  Source: EPACT, PPA, England. Figures are for prescription items prescribed by GPs in England. The data do not cover drugs dispensed in hospital or private prescriptions.

  2.  The total actual cost takes account of the net ingredient cost (NIC) of a drug, discount allowances, container costs and VAT.

  3.  BNF sections are based on the British National Formulary (September 2001). Dressings and appliances and those items in the PPA pseudo classification are excluded.

  2.  Note, the figures contained in the table are for BNF section 2.12 and not just for statins. However, statins form about 93 per cent by cost of the section.

  3.  The expenditure on lipid regulating drugs continues to grow at around 33 per cent a year and reflects effective implementation of the standards in the National Service Framework for Coronary Heart Disease.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 17 February 2003