Select Committee on Health Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence


APPENDIX 15

Joint memorandum by Dr Thierry Chaussalet, Dr Elia El-Darzi and Professor Peter Millard, from The Health and Social Care Modelling Group (DD 25)

1.  MAIN RECOMMENDATION

  1.1  The Health Committee should recommend government to develop statistically valid models to test the possible short and long-term outcome of the proposed changes in health and social care systems.

  1.2  In reviewing evidence concerning the benefits and disadvantages of speedy hospital care the Health Committee needs to take into account the outcome of the policy on the individuals as well as on the total system of care.

2.  THE UNIVERSITY OF WESTMINSTER HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE MODELLING GROUP (HSCMG)

  2.1  HSCMG is an interdisciplinary group of academic staff, research assistants and PhD students with expertise in mathematical modelling, computer programming, operational research, decision sciences and statistics.

  2.2  Dr Thierry J Chaussalet is a principal lecturer in Management Science at the University of Westminster. His main research interests are in modelling biological and health care processes, and the development of decision support tools that can aid decision making in the care of older people.

  2.3  Dr Elia El-Darzi is chair of the department of Software and Information Systems at the University of Westminster. His main research interest is the application of decision modelling and IT to business problems.

  2.4  Professor Peter H Millard is a visiting professor to the University of Westminster. He held the Eleanor Peel Chair of Geriatric Medicine at St George's Hospital Medical School (1979-99). 1989 and 1993 doctoral thesis developed and tested a theoretical and practical way of measuring flow through health care systems

  2.5  Recent peer reviewed HSCMG publications concern: modelling the decisions of a local authority panel for admission of older people to nursing and residential home (Xie et al 2001); simulating interaction between acute, rehabilitative and long stay care (El-Darzi et al 1999, 2000); public holiday effect theory to explain post-Christmas bed crises (Vasilakis & El-Darzi 2001); measuring and modelling patient flow in hospital (El-Darzi et al 1998; Christodoulou & Millard 2000) and surgical services (Millard et al 2000); use of flow modelling to demonstrate how rehabilitation changed bed usage in a Spanish hospital (Garcia-Navarro & Thompson 2001); modelling the flow of elderly patients, clients and residents through health and social care services in an English Health District (Millard et al 2001); a decision tree approach to evaluating options for case finding, diagnosing and treating older people with dementia (Millard & Chaussalet 1998; Chaussalet et al 1998); Markov models and data requirements for natural history modelling of Alzheimer's disease (Chaussalet & Thompson 2001); sub-group analyses of cost of care in Alzheimer's disease (Thompson & Chaussalet 2001); simulation study on evaluating screening policies for Alzheimer's diseases (Chaussalet et al 2000); application of a continuous time hidden Markov model to model geriatric inpatient behaviour (Christodoulou & Taylor 2001).

3.  SEEING THE BIG PICTURE

  3.1  There are 64 ways that a hospital system providing acute, rehabilitative and long stay care can be changed—not all of these changes are beneficial. The corollary of increasing numbers of potential long-term patients in the community, single parent families and an ageing population is that the number of so-called "social admissions" to hospitals will increase. For, acute hospitals are the community's ultimate safety net.

  3.2  The system is overheated, because the Operational Plan that underpinned the NHS has been forgotten. Prolonged rehabilitation of potential long stay patients was a key component of the original plan. (Millard 1994). In direct contrast, the proposed solution to the bed crisis focuses attention on blocking "social" admissions and increasing speed of treatment.

  3.3  In this submission we illustrate modern techniques of data analysis that could be used to facilitate understanding and planning.


4.  BLACK-BOX PLANNING

  4.1  Mistakes are being made in the planning of hospital services because "black-box models" are used to underpin health and social care decision-making. In black-box models (Figure 1) all measures of activity are taken without the system understudy.

  4.2  Black-box models assume that the space within hospitals is homogenous. Thus, removing waiting lists and freeing acute beds is seen to be simply a matter of shortening length of stay, stopping inappropriate (social) admissions, early discharge, rapid transfer elsewhere and time limited (six weeks) rehabilitation.

  4.3  If the model is right, the solution is right. What-if the model is wrong? Here we use results of recent research to show why the current policy initiative of speedy discharge and time-limited rehabilitation will probably fail. To understand the unique features of the NHS bed crisis new methods of data presentation and analysis need to be introduced.

BED OCCUPANCY


  5.1  Figure 2 uses a new approach named "Strata" to show how hospital beds are actually being used. The data concerns two years inpatient bed usage in geriatric and general medicine in a London teaching hospital. The plot was created using a discharge data set: this explains the rapid decrease in bed numbers at the end of the two-year period.

Figure 2 The stratas within occupied medical and geriatric beds

  5.2  Although the majority of inpatients are short stay, the beds are mainly occupied by patients who stay or more than one week. The black layer beneath the day patient layer shows the beds used by patients who stayed for less than seven days. The other layers represent bed usage by patients with progressively longer lengths of stay.

  5.3  The choice to do one thing is a choice not to do another thing. Given the national shortage of qualified therapy staff, the probable detrimental effect of a policy focus on rapid discharge and community-based rehabilitation will be:

    1.  A decrease in the quality of inpatient rehabilitative care.

    2.  An increase in dependency of hospitial patients.

    3.  An increase in the demand for long-term care, and

    4.  An increase in the number of readmissions and social admissions.

UNDERSTANDING LENGTH OF STAY

  Length of stay is skewed

  The current policy focuses attention on shortening the average length of stay of discharged patients. Yet, the data in table 1 shows that the average stay (the mean) is an inadequate measure of activity. Consider general medicine: the average stay is 11 days; the most frequent length of stay (the mode) is two days; 50 per cent (the median) of overnight patients are discharged in four days and the distribution is skewed—because the range is one to 207 days.

Table 1

DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS OF LENGTH OF STAY IN DAYS OF INPATIENTS DISCHARGED DURING THREE MONTHS: DAY CASES ARE NOT INCLUDED

Statistics
All cases
Medicine
Surgery
Geriatrics
Obstetrics
Paediatrics
Mean
10
11
8
31
5
3
Cases
4,916
1,325
1,219
525
1,060
787
Minimum
1
1
1
1
1
1
Maximum
463
207
96
463
121
32
Mode
2
2
2
14
1
1
Median
4
7
4
17
2
2
Skewness
9
7
3
5
6
5


  6.1.1  Given the evidence in table 1, numerically and clinically, the correct way to shorten the average length of stay in all specialities is to focus attention on the prevention and improved inpatient management of complexity. Anything that makes the probability increase that an admitted patient will become unnecessarily dependent is, in the long run, detrimental to the total well being of the person and the group.

6.2  SPEED ALONE IS NOT ENOUGH

  6.2.1  A minimum of two numbers is needed to explain differences in hospital length of stay. Speed alone is not enough. A car travelling at 100 miles an hour around Parliament Square is likely to crash. Where it crashes depends on the direction the car is being driven. Similarly, speed of hospital discharge is an inadequate indicator of success.

  6.2.2  In addition to measuring speed of treatment Ministers need to find ways of measuring the end result of the patients' journey through hospital care. Analysis of the pattern of discharge destinations of patients aged 65 and over with stroke illness showed that the risk in 1994 of being discharged to nursing homes varied between one in a hundred and one in ten (Millard 1998). Such differences have enormous personal and financial consequences that should not be ignored.

  6.2.3  A study, undertaken in 14 departments of geriatric medicine in southern England, showed that three factors explained observed differences in speed of treatment:

    1.  The percentage of inpatients coded for discharge to nursing homes.

    2.  The consultants' opinion concerning ease of discharge of potential long stay patients; and

    3.  The nurses' opinion concerning the quality of inpatient rehabilitative care.

    4.  Departments with a slower turnover of short stay patients referred fewer patients to long stay care services. Conversely, the quicker the turnover of short stay patients, the greater the likelihood that they would be discharged to nursing homes.

  6.3  In reviewing evidence concerning the benefits and disadvantages of speedy hospital care the Committee needs to take into account the outcome of the policy on the total system of care.

UNDERSTANDING FLOW

  7.1  Words such as acute, rehabilitation and long stay reflect dimensions of time, as well as dimensions of resource use. The key to improved planning depends on understanding how resources in the hospital and in the community are interacting to influence staff behaviour.

  7.2  Success in the running of a hospital depends on all presenting patients having optimal treatment. Poor performance in any part of the system is detrimental to the individual sick person as well as to the group. Policies associated with the blocking of certain types of patients, eg social problems, will change the case mix and change the flow.

  7.3  Flow models differ from case mix models because they measure the time being taken by patients to flow through the system of care.


  7.4  When considering the wisdom of "blocking" social admissions the committee should bear in mind that the perceived wisdom of the generation of geriatricians who established the acute aspects of the specialty was that "delay in admission blocks therapeutic effectiveness" (Hodkinson & Jeffreys 1972).

MEASURING FLOW

  8.1  The flow of patients through health and social care systems can easily be measured using computer assisted data analysis. Bed occupancy was considered by Yates (1982) to be a

  8.2  Since 1991, when the original paper that described the method of measuring flow was published, the new method of measuring hospital inpatient activity has been validated and extended by academic researches. The results of data analysis from a wide range of hospital services in different countries have confirmed the universal applicability of the method of data analysis.

  8.3  Doctoral students working with Prof McClean at the University of Ulster have both extended the method of analysis to include community compartments and developed ways of predicting the probability that older patients referred to hospital will occupy beds. Doctoral students working with us are currently developing methods we have illustrated here to analyse large databases and to forecast the outcome of client referral to local authority panels.

Table 2

MODELLED RESOURCE UTILISATION FOR THREE SPECIALITIES AND THE OVERALL HOSPITAL, WITHOUT DAY CASES

  
General Surgery
General Medicine
Geriatrics
Overall
Actual Beds
97.0
132.0
140.0
386.0
Modelled Beds
96.8
132.6
136.7
380.9
Admissions per day
13.0
13.8
5.0
27.5
Overall average length of stay
7.4
9.6
27.3
13.9
Fast stream
Average Stay (days)
3.7
5.6
11.7
9.0
50% leave (½ life)
2.2
3.6
7.8
5.9
Percentage Discharged
77.4
76.0
72.6
88.0
Modelled Beds Used (%)
48(49.9)
78(58.5)
59(42.9)
247(64.8)
Slow stream
Average Stay (days)
16.5
14.5
49.1
36.8
50% leave (½ life)
11.1
9.7
33.7
25.2
Percentage Discharged
100.0
97.1
99.7
99.8
Modelled Beds Used (%)
48(50.1)
48(36.1)
67(49.3)
121(31.8)
Long stay stream
Average Stay (days)
  
76.1
2,543.9
1,685.9
50% leave (½ life)
  
52.4
1,762.9
1,168.3
Percentage Discharged
  
100.0
100.0
100.0
Modelled Beds Used (%)
  
7(5.5)
11(7.8)
13.0(3.5)


  8.4  Table 2 contains the results of a bed occupancy flow rate analysis, which shows how inpatients were flowing through the 386 occupied beds as well as in the general surgery, general medicine and geriatrics beds. Bear in mind that these results were obtained simply by analysing bed census data. Notice that the specialities of general and geriatric medicine contained three streams of flow, and general surgery contained two streams.

  8.5  As well as identifying the streams the new method estimates the likely outcome of admission. Overall 88 per cent of admitted patients will be short stay. These patients will use two-thirds of the beds (64.8 per cent) and have an average stay of 9.0 days (50 per cent will be discharged in 5.9 days). The average stay of the second stream patients will be 36.8 days (50 per cent will leave in 25.2 days). Overall, only two in every 1,000 admitted patients will enter the third stream of care. Their average stay will be 1,685.9 days (fifty percent will leave in 1,168.3 days): they will occupy 13 beds.

  8.6  The long stay patients are present in the St George's Hospital department of geriatric medicine because the Bolingbroke Hospital contains the world's first, single room, personalised, demonstration long stay unit (Millard & Kist 1995).

9.  WHAT-IF ANALYSIS

  9.1  We conclude our submission to the Health Committee with the "What-if" figure (Figure 4) from the paper that developed the new method of measuring and modelling bed occupancy data (Harrison & Millard 1991). Using data derived from analysis of the streams of flow in the occupied beds in one department of geriatric medicine the figure shows the short and long stay effect of different changes in the system of care.


  9.2  The benefit of using bed occupancy time to model flow are fourfold.

    1.  Current and historic resource use can be analysed.

    2.  The work function of occupied beds can be measured.

    3.  Dynamic and stochastic models can be created.

    4.  What-if analysis can be performed.

  9.3  Given the unknown territory into which the government is moving the rehabilitative component of care, the worst-case scenario is that the actions being taken will make the problem of providing care for the population worse. Research by Prof Sally McClean at the University of Ulster has led to the development of methods of measuring and modelling the total system of care (Taylor, McClean and Millard 1998, 2000) and predicting the time component of resource utilisation by dependent people (Marshall, McClean et al 2001). Our group has developed methods of simulating the effect of change on the total system of care. We argue that the potential to solve the long-term health and social care needs of an ageing population can only be achieved by using a new scientific approach to the planning of health and social care services.

  9.4  We are grateful for the opportunity presented by this Inquiry to present aspects of this exciting new field of research endeavour and would be pleased if the opportunity arises to attend to give oral evidence or to welcome representatives of the committee to demonstrate the computer assisted data analytical tools that our group has been developing and testing.

Thursday 24 January 2002

REFERENCES

  Chaussalet T.J., Millard P.H. and El-Darzi E. (1998) Evaluating the costs of alternative options for dementia services. Health Care Management Science 1, 125-131.

  Chaussalet T.J., Xie, H. Thompson W.A. and Millard P.H. (2000) A discrete event simulation approach for evaluating screening policies for Alzheimer's disease. In Simulation and modelling—enablers for a better quality of life: Proceedings of the 14th European Simulation Multiconference, May 23-26, 2000, Ghent, Belgium, SCS Publications, pp 624-630.

  Chaussalet, T.J. and Thompson W.A. (2001) Data requirements in a model of the natural history of Alzheimer's disease. Health Care Management Science 4, 11-17.

  Christodoulou, G. and P.H. Millard (2000) Measuring and modelling patient flow. British Journal of Health Care Management 6, 463-468.

  Christodoulou, G. and Taylor G.J. (2001) Using a continuous time hidden Markov process, with covariates, to model bed occupancy of people aged over 65 years. Health Care Management Science 4, 21-24.

  El-Darzi E., Vasilakis C., Chaussalet T.J. and Millard P.H. (1998) A Simulation Modelling Approach to Evaluating Length of Stay, Occupancy, Emptiness and Bed Blocking in a Hospital Geriatric Department. Health Care Management Science 1(2), 143-149.

  El-Darzi, E., C. Vasilakis, T.J. Chaussalet and P.H. Millard (2000) A simulation model to evaluate the interaction between the acute, rehabilitation, long-stay care and the community. In: Zanakis, S.H., Doukidis, G. and Zopounidis, C., (eds) Recent Developments and Applications in Decision Making, pp. 475-485. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  Garçia-Navarro, J.A. and Thompson W.A. (2001) Analysis of bed usage and occupancy following the introduction of geriatric rehabilitation care in a hospital in Huesca, Spain. Health Care Management Science 4, 63-66.

  Harrison, G.W. and P.H. Millard (1991) Balancing acute and long-term care: the mathematics of throughput in departments of geriatric medicine. Methods of Information in Medicine 30, 221-228.

  Harrison, G.W. (2001) Implications of mixed exponential occupancy distributions and patient flow models for health care planning. Health Care Management Science 4, 35-43.

  Hodkinson, H.M. & Jeffreys, P.M. (1972). Making hospital geriatrics work. British Medical Journal, 4, 536-539.

  Marshall, A.H. McClean, S.I.. Shapcott, C.M. Hastie I.R and. Millard P.H (2001) Developing a Bayesian belief network for the management of geriatric hospital care Health Care Management Science, 4, 25-30.

  McClean, S.I. and Millard P.H. (1993) Modelling in-patient bed usage behaviour in a department of geriatric medicine. Methods of Information in Medicine. 32, 79-81.

  Millard, P.H. (1994) Meeting the needs of an ageing population. Proceedings of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh 24, 187-96.

  Millard P.H. (1998) The anatomy, physiology and biochemistry of health care for an ageing population. Health and Hygiene 19: 49-60.

  Millard, P.H. and T.J. Chaussalet (1998) A modelling approach to the development of health and social services for dementia care. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 6, 325-334.

  Millard, P.H. and Kist, P. (1995) Care of the long stay elderly patient: the Bolingbroke project. In: Denham, M.J., (Ed.) Care of the long stay elderly patient, London: Chapman and Hall.

  Millard P.H., Mackay M., Vasilakis C. and Christodoulou G. (2000) Measuring and modelling surgical bed usage. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons England. 82, 75-82.

  Millard P.H., Christodoulou G., Jagger C., Harrison G.W. and McClean S.I (2001) Modelling hospital and social care bed occupancy and use by elderly people in an English health district. Health Care Management Science 4, 57-62.

  Taylor G.J., McClean S.I., Millard P.H. (1998) Using a continuous-time Markov model with Poisson arrivals to describe the movement of geriatric patients. Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis 14:165-174.

  Taylor G.J., McClean S.I., Millard P.H. (2000) Stochastic models of geriatric patient occupancy behaviour. Royal Statistical Society (Series A) 493-503.

  Thompson W.A., Chaussalet T.J. (2001) Subgroup analyses of cost of care in a Markov model of the natural history of Alzheimer's Disease. In: J.G. Anderson and M. Katzper (eds.) The Proceedings of The Simulation in The Health and Medical Sciences 2001, pp. 41-44. Simulation Councils, Inc.

  Vasilakis C., El-Darzi E. (2001) A simulation study of the winter bed crisis. Health Care Management Science 4, 31-36

  Xie, H., Chaussalet, T.J., Thompson W.A, Millard P.H. (2002) Modelling decisions of a multidisciplinary panel for admission to long-term care, accepted for publication in Health Care Management Science.

  Yates, J. (1982). Hospital beds: a problem for diagnosis and management. London: William Heinemann.

24 January 2002



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2002
Prepared 29 July 2002