Select Committee on Statutory Instruments Third Report


APPENDIX

Memoranda from the Department for International Development

DRAFT CARIBBEAN DEVELOPMENT BANK (FURTHER PAYMENTS) ORDER 2002

Introduction

1. This Order is laid pursuant to Section 11 of the International Development Act 2002. Section 11 of the International Development Act 2002 (which repeals and re-enacts similar provisions in the Overseas Development and Co-operation Act 1980) provides that where the Government of the United Kingdom is, at the time the section comes into force, or at a later time becomes, bound to make a relevant payment to a multilateral development bank, the Secretary of State may make the relevant payment (and other associated payments specified in section 11(3)). However she may only make the payment if it has been approved for the purposes of the section by order made by her with the approval of the Treasury after a draft of the Order has been laid before and approved by the House of Commons. Under section 11(2), "multilateral development bank" is defined as an international financial institution having as one of its objects economic development, either generally or in any region of the world. The Caribbean Development Bank is one such institution.

Policy Objective

2. The Department for International Development (DFID) is responsible for leading the United Kingdom's contribution to promoting development and the reduction of poverty. The overall objective of DFID is the elimination of world poverty. This objective was set out in the 1997 White Paper "Eliminating World Poverty: A Challenge for the 21st Century", and reaffirmed in the 2000 White Paper "Eliminating World Poverty: Making Globalisation Work for the Poor". DFID delivers its international development funds through a combination of bilateral programmes, and contributions to various international financial institutions, such as the Caribbean Development Bank.

3. The Caribbean Development Bank (CDB) is a regional development bank established in 1969. Its purpose is to contribute to the economic growth and development of the member countries in the Caribbean, and to promote economic co-operation and integration among them, having special regard to the less developed members of the region. The major regional shareholders are Jamaica and Trinidad & Tobago (both 16.98% shares and 16.62% votes). The major non-regional shareholders are the United Kingdom and Canada (both 9.13% shares and 9.00% votes).

4. The CDB is structured along similar lines to the World Bank, with two main lending windows: Ordinary Capital Resources (OCR) which lends at market rates of interest; and the Special Development Fund (SDF) which lends on concessional terms to the poorest member countries. The SDF is primarily donor funded and is replenished usually every three years. Negotiations on the fifth replenishment of the SDF (SDF-V) were concluded in late 2001. Copies of the SDF-V Contributor's Report have been placed in the House of Commons Library.

5. Since its establishment there have been four replenishments of the SDF. The United Kingdom has contributed a total of just over £37 million to these replenishments as follows:

1st Replenishment: £ 6,640,300

2nd Replenishment: £ 9,252,510

3rd Replenishment: £10,578,000

4th Replenishment: £10,600,000

Purpose of the Order

6. The purpose of the present Order, the draft of which is now laid before the House of Commons, is to enable Her Majesty's Government:

(i) to make a further contribution to the Special Development Fund of a sum not exceeding £17,496,000. This is the equivalent to US$ 25,200,000 converted to sterling on the basis of daily exchange rates averaged monthly for the six months ending 30 June 2001 as supplied by the International Monetary Fund. The United Kingdom contribution will become effective following the deposit with the Bank of an appropriate Instrument of Subscription. In accordance with the Resolution, the United Kingdom's payments will be made in four annual instalments, either in cash, or in the form of non-negotiable, non-interest-bearing promissory notes expressed in pounds sterling encashable on demand, or in a combination of the two. Subject to the provisions of section 6 of the Resolution, the first instalment shall be paid not later than 30 days after the date of deposit with the Bank of the Instrument of Contribution. Drawdown against promissory notes shall take place semi-annually based on the Bank's projected disbursement requirements.

(ii) to redeem non-interest-bearing and non-negotiable notes or other obligations issued by the Government in payment of the contribution.

The Need for a Section 11 Order

7. In connection with the payment envisaged in Article 2(a) of the Order, no obligation will arise until an Instrument of Subscription is deposited by the United Kingdom. The deposit of such an Instrument binds the United Kingdom to make the payment foreseen in Article 2(a). The payment envisaged in Article 2(b) of the Order is linked to the payment envisaged in Article 2(a) of the Order and would occur only on the basis that Article 2(a) had become effective and payment had been made under it.

8. This raises a technical issue regarding the use of the order making power, one which the Committee has addressed already under similar provisions in the 1980 Act. The issue arises from the fact that the section applies (and therefore, it would appear, the power to make the order arises) where the Government is bound to make the payment. The Government will be bound when the Instrument of subscription is deposited.

9. The seeking of Parliamentary approval of the draft of the Order however does not appear to be ruled out, and therefore the approach the Committee has taken in the past (such a procedure was considered in the context of the draft Inter-American Development Bank (Seventh General Increase) Order 1989 by the Select Committee on Statutory Instruments in its Sixth Report (HC 48-vi 1988-89)) has been that there was no technical reason for the House not to approve the draft Order but that it should merely be aware that it is acting, as on occasions in the past, on a ministerial undertaking that no order will be made until the Government is bound. Accordingly the Secretary of State gives her undertaking that no order will be made in terms of the draft until, on deposition of an Instrument of Subscription, the Government is bound to make the payment.

10. The purpose of the presentation of the draft Order is therefore, as under the 1980 Act, in order to secure the approval of the House of Commons before the deposit of an Instrument of Subscription.

11. The powers under the IDA are slightly different from those under the 1980 Act, in that the order is expressly the means by which approval is given to the making of a payment by the Secretary of State; whereas under the former powers the order made provision for the making of the payment itself. The new provisions therefore render more clearly the purposes of the order as a pre-requisite for the act of payment. Nevertheless, as under the 1980 Act, the strict legal position appears to be that only when the obligation to pay has come into existence does the Secretary of State have power to make an order in terms of the draft.

12. The Department respectfully submits that the new powers in section 11 of the IDA do not require any departure from the Committee's established approach to the exercise of the powers under section 4 of the 1980 Act.

June 2002

DRAFT AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT FUND (ADDITIONAL SUBSCRIPTIONS) ORDER 2002

Introduction

1. This Order is laid pursuant to Section 11 of the International Development Act 2002. Section 11 of the International Development Act 2002 (which repeals and re-enacts similar provisions in the Overseas Development and Co-operation Act 1980) provides that where the Government of the United Kingdom is at the time the section comes into force, or at a later time becomes, bound to make a relevant payment to a multilateral development bank, the Secretary of State may make the relevant payment (and other associated payments specified in section 11(3)). However she may only make the payment if it is approved for the purposes of the section by order made by her with the approval of the Treasury after a draft of the Order has been laid before and approved by the House of Commons. Under section 11(2), "multilateral development bank" is defined as an international financial institution having as one of its objects economic development, either generally or in any region of the world. The African Development Fund is one such institution.

Policy Objective

2. The Department for International Development (DFID) is responsible for leading the United Kingdom's contribution to promoting development and the reduction of poverty. The overall objective of DFID is the elimination of world poverty. This objective was set out in the 1997 White Paper "Eliminating World Poverty: A Challenge for the 21st Century", and reaffirmed in the 2000 White Paper "Eliminating World Poverty: Making Globalisation Work for the Poor". DFID delivers its international development funds through a combination of bilateral programmes, and contributions to various international financial institutions, such as the African Development Bank Group.

3. The African Development Bank Group is a regional development bank established in 1964. Its purpose is to contribute to the economic development and social progress of its regional members, both individually and jointly. The major regional shareholders are Nigeria, Egypt, Algeria and South Africa. The major non-regional shareholders are the USA, Japan and Germany. The United Kingdom joined the Bank in 1983 and is a relatively junior partner with a 1.6% shareholding.

4. The African Development Bank Group is structured along similar lines to the World Bank, with two main lending windows: the African Development Bank (ADB) which lends at market rates of interest; and the African Development Fund (ADF) which lends on highly concessional terms to the poorest member countries. The ADF was established in 1972 and is primarily donor funded. It is replenished usually every three years. Negotiations on the ninth replenishment of the ADF (ADF-IX) commenced in June 2001 and are expected to be concluded later this year.

5. Since the creation of the ADF, there have been eight replenishments, generally at two and a half to three year intervals. The United Kingdom has contributed to these replenishments as follows:

1st Replenishment (1976-1978): £10,000,000

2nd Replenishment (1979-1981): £18,499,554

3rd Replenishment (1982-1984): £24,170,300

4th Replenishment (1985-1987): £30,934,961

5th Replenishment (1988-1990): £57,833,971

6th Replenishment (1991-1993): £71,915,912

7th Replenishment (1996-1998): £70,225,661

8th Replenishment (1999-2001): £98,639,079

Purpose of the Order

6. The purpose of the present Order, the draft of which is now laid before the House of Commons, is to enable Her Majesty's Government:

(i) to make an additional contribution to the African Development Fund of a sum not exceeding £40,000,000. This is the equivalent to UA 45,158,450 converted to sterling on the basis of daily exchange rates averaged monthly for the six months ending 30 November 2001 as supplied by the International Monetary Fund. The purpose of this additional contribution, together with the contributions pledged by other donors, is to provide the Fund with sufficient commitment capacity to help tide it over until negotiations on the Ninth Replenishment of the Fund can be concluded. All additional contributions will score as contributions to the Ninth Replenishment. The United Kingdom contribution will represent around 11 per cent of the total donor pledges to the interim financing arrangement of some UA 416,084,958 (approx £ 368.52 million). Resolution F/BG/2002/03 will come into effect when Instruments of Subscription have been deposited by five donor countries. In accordance with Resolution F/BG/2002/03 the United Kingdom's contribution will be made in one instalment in the form of a non-negotiable, non-interest-bearing promissory note expressed in pounds sterling encashable on demand. A copy of Resolution F/BG/2002/03 has been laid in the House of Commons library.

(ii) to redeem non-interest-bearing and non-negotiable notes or other obligations issued by the Government in payment of the contribution.

The Need for a Section 11 Order

7. In connection with the payment envisaged in Article 2(a) of the Order, no obligation will arise until an Instrument of Subscription is deposited by the United Kingdom. The deposit of such an Instrument binds the United Kingdom to make the payment foreseen in Article 2(a). The payment envisaged in Article 2(b) of the Order is linked to the payment envisaged in Article 2(a) of the Order and would occur only on the basis that Article 2(a) had become effective and payment had been made under it.

8. This raises a technical issue regarding the use of the order making power, one which the Committee has addressed already under similar provisions in the 1980 Act. The issue arises from the fact that the section applies (and therefore, it would appear, the power to make the order arises) where the Government is bound to make the payment. The Government will be bound when the Instrument of Subscription is deposited.

9. The seeking of Parliamentary approval of the draft of the Order however does not appear to be ruled out, and therefore the approach the Committee has taken in the past (such a procedure was considered in the context of the draft Inter-American Development Bank (Seventh General Increase) Order 1989 by the Select Committee on Statutory Instruments in its Sixth Report (HC 48-vi 1988-89)) has been that there was no technical reason for the House not to approve the draft Order but that it should merely be aware that it is acting, as on occasions in the past, on a ministerial undertaking that no order will be made until the Government is bound. Accordingly the Secretary of State gives her undertaking that no order will be made in terms of the draft until, on deposition of an Instrument of Subscription, the Government is bound to make the payment.

10. The purpose of the presentation of the draft Order is therefore, as under the 1980 Act, in order to secure the approval of the House of Commons before the deposit of an Instrument of Subscription.

11. The powers under the IDA are slightly different from those under the 1980 Act, in that the order is expressly the means by which approval is given to the making of a payment by the Secretary of State; whereas under the former powers the order made provision for the making of the payment itself. The new provisions therefore render more clearly the purposes of the order as a pre-requisite for the act of payment. Nevertheless, as under the 1980 Act, the strict legal position appears to be that only when the obligation to pay has come into existence does the Secretary of State have power to make an order in terms of the draft.

12. The Department respectfully submits that the new powers in section 11 of the IDA do not require any departure from the Committee's established approach to the exercise of the powers under section 4 of the 1980 Act.

June 2002



 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2002
Prepared 10 July 2002