Select Committee on Work and Pensions Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence


Memorandum submitted by the National Association of Pension Funds (NAPF) (PC 22)


  The NAPF welcomes the concept of the Pension Credit in principle and believes that it is a useful step towards rewarding low-income pensioners for their thrift during their working lifetime. However, it is very complex. Although it will act as an incentive to save for those on very low incomes, it may increase the confusion for those at the margin.


  1.1  The National Association of Pension Funds represents around 1,000 schemes covering many thousands of private and public sector employers (with a combined membership of around 8 million) as well as 400 professional organisations providing related actuarial, fund management, investment consultancy, accountancy and legal services.

  1.2  NAPF's members account for funds of some £650 billion, and pension funds between them own about a fifth of the entire market in UK equities. The scale of the funds involved in pension provision, whether private pre-funded or state pay-as-you-go schemes, is large enough to have a substantial impact on national economies and international capital flows. A thriving funded pension sector is good for the economy as a whole.

  1.3  The NAPF welcomes the concept of the Pension Credit in principle and believes that it is a useful step towards rewarding low-income pensioners for their thrift during their working lifetime. It will be of considerable help to those existing pensioners of occupational pension schemes who are receiving state means-tested benefits, including a number of widows. It will also assist existing employees on low earnings, eg part-timers, to have greater confidence in contributing to an occupational pension scheme without the fear that their contributions could be "wasted" in terms of total retirement income.

  1.4  It should be noted that the NAPF's field of responsibility does not extend to the full remit of the Committee. Consequently we have not responded to all the areas covered in the Committee's call for evidence.


  2.1  The Pension Credit is very complex. Although it will act as an incentive to save for those on very low incomes, it may increase the confusion for those at the margin. Significant numbers of people will be unsure whether they will receive the Credit or not.

  2.2  The Pension Credit is effectively a combination of the recently introduced but now well-recognised MIG, and a new savings credit. The amalgamation of two different ideas into one credit is likely to confuse people who are thinking of saving for their retirement. This confusion can only be increased by the fact that the MIG is an entitlement for every pensioner, whereas there are extra qualification criteria for the savings credit.

  2.3  Such confusion is particularly relevant for those with broken work patterns. The poorest pensioners are often those with a chequered work history which involves periods of unemployment or under-employment. The Pension Credit will not be of as much benefit to those who have not built up a full set of National Insurance contributions.

  2.4  For these pensioners, the first part of their income from savings or private pensions will be used to bring them up to the level of the basic state pension. People on low incomes, and with gaps in their National Insurance record, will therefore face a significant disincentive to save compared to people with a full entitlement to the basic state pension. This will apply particularly to women, who may take a long break from work to raise a family or care for other relatives.

  2.5  Given the scope for possible confusion, it is essential that very clear and simple communications material should be made available, together with a helpline (perhaps run by OPAS).


  3.1  When surveyed in June 2001, the majority of NAPF members supported the Government's aim that, by 2050, the provision of pension income be 60 per cent private and 40 per cent public. (This situation is currently reversed: 40 per cent of pension income is private, and 60 per cent public).

  3.2  To achieve this aim, pensions must be an attractive option to people looking to provide for themselves in retirement. The Government should therefore commit itself to a stable hierarchy of taxation. This hierarchy should offer the greatest incentives to those products requiring the longest commitment. Pensions require an individual to commit their money until retirement. Pensions should therefore attract the greatest incentives, as they offer the greatest benefits to the community by guaranteeing that assets will not be dissipated before retirement.

  3.4  Pensions also offer benefits to the Treasury. Pensions in payment attract income tax, unlike the income from savings vehicles such as ISAs.

  3.5  The Pension Credit makes no distinction between income received from an occupational or private pension and, for example, interest paid on PEPs or ISAs. This may put a barrier in the way of transforming the provision of pension income to 60 per cent private and 40 per cent public provision.

  3.6  The proposals will, in effect, introduce a marginal tax rate of 40 per cent for those receiving small occupational pensions. Consideration might be given to reducing this to, say, 20 per cent, which seems more in line with tax policy in general. If this cannot be afforded at the outset, it would be useful if the Government could make it clear whether they see a case in principle for the 40 per cent to be reduced in future years.


  4.1  It is recommended that special attention be paid to the amount of pension which can be retained by pensioners who are in hospital on a long-term basis. At present, we believe that retention levels are inadequate to enable such people to provide for occasional one-off expenditures eg presents to relatives, leading to a loss of human dignity.


  5.1  We are pleased that the Government has listened to the pensions community in designing this scheme (in particular, the proposed extension of the Pension Credit to benefit people on Housing Benefit is very welcome). We will offer any assistance possible in getting the small print of the Regulations right. The Credit is likely to open up new options for employers and the trustees of occupational pension schemes to help their poorer pensioners through targeted increases which will no longer be wasted. We know that some companies are already starting to look at this issue, and the NAPF will be drawing members' attention to the new possibilities which are opening up, once the regulations have been made.

Vicki Bolton

Political Liaison Officer

18 January 2002

previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2002
Prepared 12 April 2002