Adoption and Children Bill

[back to previous text]

Mr. Brazier: My hon. Friend has not mentioned the role of the Isles of Scilly. Is that because they have a different status, as part of England, or will he come on to the subject of those islands?

Mr. Bellingham: That is a good point. The Isles of Scilly have a parish council, not a Parliament. As far as I am aware, although they have some devolved functions, their services, such as social services and education, are mostly provided by Cornwall county council.

Kevin Brennan: Do they have a Member of Parliament?

Column Number: 545

Mr. Bellingham: Some functions are wholly devolved, but the body concerned is really a parish council which, in one or two specific local matters including parks and cemeteries, has an element of sovereign power.

Mr. Brazier: Before my hon. Friend leaves the subject of the Isles of Scilly, I draw his attention to the sedentary intervention of the hon. Member for Cardiff, West (Kevin Brennan). I think that the answer to it is yes. The islands form part of a parliamentary constituency—South-East Cornwall, is it not?

Mr. Bellingham: Yes, they have a Member of Parliament. In fact, the Isle of Man, Guernsey and Jersey do not have representation in this House because they have their own Parliaments. That is probably a mistake.

The Chairman: Order. The hon. Gentleman is perfectly entitled and in order to advise the Committee of his interpretation of the terms ''British Islands'' and ''United Kingdom'', but I fear that we should not get into a discourse about whether one island looks after its parks and another its cemeteries. I hope that the hon. Gentleman will take that point and refer to the words on the amendment paper.

Mr. Bellingham: We have digressed a little, but it is important to explain the background to the amendment, because unless one does, one could end up looking a little foolish. It is too bland an exercise simply to take the amendment as it is. I am keen for the Minister to accept the spirit of my amendment and the intention behind it, but not necessarily its current format. If it is her intention to include the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man in the provision, she must find a better definition of ''British Islands''. She should perhaps insert ''the United Kingdom, the Isle of Man, Jersey and Guernsey.''

I have explained my intentions and, hopefully, convinced the Committee of the real sensitivities and concern in the Irish Republic at this crucial time when we are trying to build on the Good Friday agreement. The amendment is very much in line with what the Prime Minister is trying to achieve and I hope that the Minister will accept it.

Jacqui Smith: The hon. Gentleman appears to be trying to use an amendment to a Bill on adoption and children to further good relations between the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland and to change legal definitions relating to the United Kingdom and the British islands. Although I am sure that many members of the Committee would share his hope that relations between this country and the Republic of Ireland continue to develop, that important issue should not be mixed up with our aims in relation to adoption and children. The Bill is not the correct vehicle for making changes to definitions in law of the terms ''United Kingdom'' and ''British Islands''—definitions that were set out in the Interpretation Act 1978—although concerns about that may be expressed in the Committee. I am afraid that, for those reasons, it would not be appropriate to accept the hon. Gentleman's amendments.

Column Number: 546

I should like, however, briefly to give the hon. Gentleman some assurance on one of his points about the Government's aims with respect to clause 120. Clause 120 provides for restrictions for Scotland on bringing children into the UK, in the same way that clause 80 does for England and Wales. It amends section 50A of the Adoptions (Scotland) Act 1978 to impose restrictions on British residents bringing or causing someone else to bring a child habitually resident outside the British islands into the UK with the intention of adopting the child in the UK, unless the person complies with prescribed requirements and meets prescribed conditions.

Mr. Walter: I am interested in the Minister's remarks. Will she enlighten the Committee as to whether, as the Bill amends Scottish legislation, the Scottish Parliament will have the power to amend it to its original meaning?

Jacqui Smith: I do not know the answer to that question, but I will find out for the hon. Gentleman. The Scottish Administration are undertaking a review of adoption law, but I think that they share our view that consistency among the different countries in the United Kingdom is important. The Scottish Parliament, as I understand it, would have the ability to change its own Act. With the agreement of Scotland, we are trying to ensure consistency.

Clause 120, alongside clause 80, ensures consistency. It also makes it a criminal offence for a British resident to bring, or cause someone else to bring, a child habitually resident outside the British islands who was adopted within the previous six months into the United Kingdom, unless the resident complies with prescribed requirements and meets prescribed conditions. A person will be liable on summary conviction to up to six months' imprisonment, or a fine not exceeding a statutory maximum of £5,000, or both. In event of the case being referred to the Crown court, he will be liable for up to 12 months' imprisonment or an unlimited fine, or both.

The clause covers residents of the British islands and defines external adoptions as those affected under the law of any country or territory outside the British islands. ''British Islands'' is defined as England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man. That is consistent with the 1976 Act, which covers England and Wales, and the Adoption (Scotland) Act 1978. The amendments, as the hon. Member for North-West Norfolk knows, would mean that the clause covered residents of the United Kingdom alone and defined external adoptions as those affected under the law of any country or territory outside the United Kingdom. The United Kingdom is defined as England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. That would introduce restrictions on bringing children from the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man into the United Kingdom and would make an adoption order made in the Channel Islands or the Isle of Man an external adoption order.

Column Number: 547

The Channel Islands and the Isle of Man have almost identical legislation to that of the United Kingdom and use the same assessment and adoption procedures. Adoption orders made in the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man are recognised in the United Kingdom and adoption orders made in the United Kingdom are recognised in the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man, which are recognised publicly as part of the British isles. For those reasons, it would be unacceptable to introduce added restrictions on bringing children into the United Kingdom from the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man and to treat adoption orders made in those countries as external adoptions.

The amendments would also mean that the clause would cover bringing into the United Kingdom for the purposes of adoption a child ''habitually resident abroad'' rather than ''outside the British Islands''. There is no legal definition of ''abroad'', which would make the clause too vague to implement satisfactorily.

The hon. Gentleman has had the opportunity to express his concerns about United Kingdom relations with the Republic of Ireland and about the interpretations and definitions in the Bill. However, I do not consider those issues appropriate to consider in relation to the Bill, and hope for those reasons that he will withdraw his amendment.

Mr. Bellingham: I am grateful for that cogent explanation. I have two final questions.

First, does the Minister know how many children are adopted into the United Kingdom from the Isle of Man and Channel Islands and how many from the United Kingdom into the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands? It would be interesting to hear that figure, if she has it to hand.

Secondly, the Minister did not address my suggestion, which would answer my concern that we must include in the definition the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man while avoiding the term ''British Islands''. She rightly said that we were not considering a Bill on adoption and children to improve relations with the Irish Republic, but does she not feel that we

Column Number: 548

could easily sort this out by using the words ''United Kingdom and the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man''?

The Chairman: Order. I must refer the hon. Gentleman to the words of the amendment, which does not contain the additions that he suggests.

Mr. Bellingham: Indeed, I accept that, but until the Minister gives us a logical reason for rejecting the amendment, we are entitled to suggest that there might be some merit in what I propose. Will she comment on my two brief points?

Jacqui Smith: I do not know the exact numbers of children, and understand that only a handful are involved, but I am not sure what point the hon. Gentleman seeks to make by determining the numbers. It is important that there is an ability to recognise adoption orders between the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man and the United Kingdom and vice versa. That is what we attempt to safeguard by rejecting the hon. Gentleman's amendment.

Secondly, I made it clear in my response that this is not the place to consider definitions. If the hon. Gentleman wants to raise that point, he must do so elsewhere.

Mr. Bellingham: I beg to ask leave to withdraw the amendment.

Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.

Mr. Hilton Dawson (Lancaster and Wyre): On a point of order, Mr. Stevenson. It is a little difficult to focus on areas such as the Channel Islands or the Scilly Isles—

The Chairman: Order. I apologise to the hon. Gentleman. I am advised that I must put the question.

It being One o'clock, The Chairman proceeded, pursuant to Sessional Order D [28 June] and the Order of the Committee [27 November], to put forthwith the Questions necessary to dispose of the business to be concluded at that time.

Clauses 120 and 123 ordered to stand part of the Bill.

        Adjourned at one minute past One o'clock till this day at half-past Four o'clock.

Column Number: 549

The following Members attended the Committee:
Stevenson, Mr. George (Chairman)
Bellingham, Mr.
Blackman, Liz
Brazier, Mr.
Brennan, Kevin
Dawson, Mr.
Djanogly, Mr.
Gidley, Sandra
Llwyd, Mr.

Column Number: 550

Loughton, Tim
Love, Mr.
Moran, Margaret
Munn, Ms
Smith, Angela
Smith, Jacqui
Walter, Mr.
Winterton, Ms Rosie

Previous Contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries ordering index

©Parliamentary copyright 2001
Prepared 11 December 2001