House of Commons
Session 2002 - 03|
Publications on the internet
Other Bills before Parliament
|Local Government Bill|
THESE NOTES REFER TO THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BILL AS INTRODUCED IN THE HOUSE OF COMMONS ON 25TH NOVEMBER 2002 [BILL 9]
LOCAL GOVERNMENT BILL
1. These explanatory notes relate to the Local Government Bill as introduced in the House of Commons on 25th November 2002. They have been produced by the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, with the Wales Office, in order to assist the reader in understanding the Bill.
2. The notes are to be read in conjunction with the Local Government Bill. They are not, and are not meant to be, a comprehensive description of the Bill. So where a clause or part of a clause does not seem to require any explanation or comment, none is given.
3. With certain exceptions, the Bill extends only to England and Wales. Clause 123 governs the extent of the Bill's provisions.
4. The Bill covers various aspects of local authorities and is in eight Parts:
[Bill 9-EN] 53/2
TERRITORIAL APPLICATION: WALES
5. The Bill has been drafted in liaison and agreement with the National Assembly for Wales and the Wales Office so that, where appropriate, it applies to both England and Wales.
6. All provisions apply to both England and Wales with the following exceptions:
COMMENTARY ON CLAUSES
PART 1: CAPITAL FINANCE ETC AND ACCOUNTS
7. The new capital finance system (like the one it replaces) sets the legal framework within which local government may undertake capital expenditure and central Government may regulate that activity.
8. The innovative feature of the new system, however, is that local authorities will be free to raise finance for capital expenditure - without Government consent - where they can afford to service the debt without Government support. There will be reserve powers for Government to set limits on borrowing and credit, but it is envisaged that these would be used only in exceptional circumstances.
Clause 1: Power to borrow
9. The present wide-ranging power of an authority to borrow for purposes relevant to its functions is preserved. But the new legislation goes further and clarifies that there is power to borrow for normal treasury management purposes - for example, to refinance existing debt.
Clauses 2, 6 and 13: Control of borrowing
10. The main borrowing control clause 2(1) will be the duty not to breach the prudential and national limits set under clauses 3 and 4.
11. Authorities will be free to seek loans from any source, but will, as now, be prohibited from borrowing in foreign currencies without the consent of Treasury, since adverse exchange rate movements could leave them owing more than they had borrowed. Various provisions in the present legislation protecting lenders to authorities will be preserved. These include the long established 'safe harbour' (clause 6) which means that lenders can still enforce their debts even if it turns out that the authority borrowed unlawfully. Clause 13(3) maintains the vital principle that all of a local authority's revenues serve as security for its borrowing.
12. The mortgaging of property will continue to be prohibited clause 13(1). It will also remain unlawful to 'securitise' that is, to - sell future revenue streams such as housing rents for immediate lump-sums (this is implicit in clause 13(1)).
Clause 3: Duty to determine affordable borrowing limit
13. This provision forms the heart of the new 'prudential' borrowing system. It first imposes a broad duty for authorities to determine and keep under review the amount they can afford to borrow. The clause then empowers the Secretary of State to define that duty in more detail in regulations, which may in turn require authorities to have regard to specified codes of practice. The latter power will be used primarily to specify the Prudential Code being produced by the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA), which will lay down the practical rules for deciding whether borrowing is affordable.
14. It will be for each authority to set its own 'prudential' limit in accordance with these rules, subject only to the scrutiny of its external auditor. The authority will then be free to borrow up to that limit without Government consent. The authority will be free to vary the limit during the year, if there is good reason. Regulations will ensure that the consent of the full Council is needed for the setting of the limit and any subsequent variation. Breach of the limit is prohibited by clause 2(1)(a).
15. Long-term borrowing will continue to be available only for capital expenditure purposes. The requirement for authorities to balance their revenue budgets prevents the use of long-term borrowing to fund revenue expenditure, though the new system, like the present one, will confer limited capacity to borrow short-term for revenue needs in the interests of cash-flow management (see note on clause 5 below).
Clause 4: Imposition of borrowing limits
16. The Government will have reserve power to impose 'longstop' limits for national economic reasons on all authorities' borrowing and these would override authorities' self-determined prudential limits (set under clause 3). Such limits (implemented by regulations) would only be imposed if authorities' total borrowing, albeit locally prudent, was increasing to a level which threatened the country's overall economic interests.
17. If an individual authority did not wish to undertake the full amount of borrowing permitted to it under a national limit, it would have power to transfer the spare 'headroom' to another authority, which would thereby have its borrowing capacity increased (subject to still complying with its own prudential limit).
18. There would be a similar power to impose a borrowing limit (by direction in this case) on an individual authority, to prevent it acting imprudently and borrowing more than it could afford.
19. Breach of the limits set under this clause is prohibited by clause 2(1)(b).
Clause 5: Temporary borrowing
20. The limits in clauses 3 and 4 apply to local authorities' long-term borrowing, which as explained in paragraph 16 can only be for capital expenditure. The present system allows authorities also to borrow temporarily to meet their revenue costs, pending the receipt of income due to them (for example, while waiting for council tax payments). This clause preserves such flexibility. The borrowing limits set by the authority itself under clause 3, or imposed by the Government under clause 4, will be automatically increased by the amounts of any payments which are due to the authority in the year but have not yet been received.
Clauses 7 and 8: Credit arrangements
21. A main aim of the present capital finance system was to regulate the innovative property leasing and hire purchase deals which some authorities used before 1990 to evade the controls on borrowing then in force. Such transactions, known collectively as 'credit arrangements', have the same crucial effects as borrowing - they both increase public expenditure and create significant long-term revenue commitments at the local level.
22. Credit arrangements (as defined in clause 7) will continue to be treated like borrowing under the new system. Clause 8 ensures that the affordability assessment under clause 3 must take account not only of borrowing but also of credit arrangements. In addition, any national limit imposed under the reserve powers in clause 4 would apply to both borrowing and credit.
23. The definition of credit arrangements is much simpler than under the present system, relying on the accounting concept of long-term liabilities. The power to vary that definition by regulations would be used to provide that certain liabilities (such as those relating to pensions) are excluded from the definition. Regulations are also likely to ensure that credit arrangements may (as now) only be entered into for capital purposes, but it will be made clear that this does not prevent the use of a Private Finance Initiative contract to provide both capital assets and related management services.
Clauses 9 to 11: Capital receipts
24. Capital receipts are defined in clause 9 broadly as now - i.e. as the proceeds of property sales. However, such sums will be treated as received when they become payable to the authority, rather than, as now, when actually paid. This change is simply part of the general approach of bringing definitions in line with accounting practice (see note below on clauses 21 and 22) and will have no practical implications. There is power to vary this definition by regulations (clause 9(3)) and it is likely that the repayment of certain loans made for capital expenditure will be, as now, defined as capital receipts.
25. The present rules requiring part of housing receipts to be 'set aside' for debt redemption will disappear. These will be replaced by new arrangements, including 'pooling' a proportion of such receipts (clause 11(2)(b)), so that spending power can be redistributed from richer authorities to those in areas with a greater need for new housing investment. This will apply to sales proceeds obtained both in cash and in non-monetary form (for example, nomination rights) (clause 10). The pooling power will apply only to housing receipts.
26. Clause 11 provides power to make regulations about the use of other capital receipts - that is, all non-housing receipts and any housing receipts which are not pooled. The intention is to ensure that such receipts will, as now, be usable only for new capital spending or for the repayment of debt.
27. The treatment of amounts already 'set-aside' under the present system will be specified in regulations made under clause 21. The repeal of the current set-aside regime will not in itself create access to any additional resources for authorities. However, the set-aside rules were relaxed for debt-free authorities, giving them extra scope for capital expenditure; and a debt-free authority with unused spending capacity of that kind will still be permitted to spend those sums when the new system starts.
Clause 12: Power to invest
28. For the avoidance of doubt, clause 12 makes clear that authorities have power to invest, not only for any purpose relevant to their functions but also for the purpose of the prudential management of their financial affairs.
29. The Secretary of State's power to issue guidance (clause 15) is likely to be used to encourage authorities to invest prudently, thus preserving the safeguards of the present system but allowing greater flexibility and more local discretion.
Clause 14: Information
30. This requirement to provide information is simpler than the one in the present capital finance legislation. In practice, it will mainly mean, as now, that authorities have to complete regular statistical returns to the Secretary of State.
Clause 15: Guidance
31. Authorities will have to have regard to any guidance either issued specifically by the Secretary of State or identified in regulations. Guidance is likely to be needed, for example, on investments, enabling Government to steer authorities towards prudent options, while avoiding the rigidities of the present controls embodied in regulations (see note on clause 12 above).
Clause 17: External funds
32. The main effect here is to ensure that transactions by local government pension funds will, as now, be outside the capital controls. Separate regulatory systems apply.
Clause 18: Local authority companies
33. The present system ensures that authorities cannot evade the capital controls by operating through companies they own or influence. That broad principle will be preserved under the new system, both for the purposes of the prudential limit and any limit imposed under reserve powers (clauses 3 and 4). This clause confers the powers necessary to achieve that end and relies upon concepts used in the present system in Part 5 of the Local Government and Housing Act 1989.
Clause 19 and Schedule 1: Application to parish and community councils
34. The borrowing of parish and town councils in England (plus charter trustees and, in Wales, community councils) is still controlled under the system in the Local Government Act 1972 which was repealed for principal authorities in 1990. This relies upon case-by-case appraisal of applications for borrowing consent. The effect of this clause is to replace the old provisions with new ones which appear in Schedule 1 to the present Bill. There is some tidying up but the broad arrangements are unchanged.
Clauses 21, 22 and 16: Accounting practices, "Revenue Account", "Capital Expenditure"
35. The new system will as far as possible take standard local authority accounting practices and concepts as its starting point, thereby avoiding the need for special definitions in the legislation.
36. The legislation will provide a framework for identifying the accounting codes which are to constitute 'proper practices' (clause 21(2)). The codes so identified will have that status for the purposes of the capital finance system and other existing legislation.
37. Some special accounting treatments may be needed for the purposes of the capital system and there will be power for the Secretary of State to specify accounting practices by regulation (clause 21(1)).
38. Clause 16 deals specifically with the definition of 'capital expenditure'. Again, the normal accounting definition will apply, but there is power to amend this, on a local-authority wide basis (by regulations) or for individual authorities (by direction). That power to widen the definition will be used very sparingly, but regulations are likely, as now, to classify computer software development costs as capital expenditure. Directions will again be given only in exceptional circumstances, which could, as now, include cases where authorities are faced with significant redundancy costs.
Clause 23: 'Local authority'
39. The list of bodies to be covered by the new system (clause 23(1)) will be largely the same as under the present system. As now, there will be power to bring levying and precepting bodies into the system later by regulations (clause 23(2)).
Clause 24: Wales
40. This clause confers on the National Assembly for Wales the various regulation making powers in the Bill which in England will fall to the Secretary of State.
PART 2: FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION
41. Clauses 25 to 29 impose new duties on local authorities about how they set and monitor their budgets. They are designed to help ensure that authorities make prudent allowance for risk and uncertainties in their budgets, and regularly monitor their finances during the year. Largely they leave discretion with the authorities about the allowances to be made and action to be taken. But clause 26 is a reserve power for the Government to lay down the minimum reserves that local authorities must allow for when they set their budgets.
42. The objective of clause 30 is to facilitate remedial action when an authority's expenditure is forecast to exceed its resources and its chief finance officer has made a formal report to that effect.
Clause 25: Budget calculations: report on robustness of estimates etc
43. Local authorities decide every year how much they are going to raise from council tax. They base their decision on a budget that sets out estimates of what they plan to spend on each of their services. Because they decide on the council tax before the year begins and can't increase it during the year, they have to consider risks and uncertainties that might force them to spend more on their services than they planned. Allowance is made for these risks by:
44. This clause requires an authority's chief finance officer to make a report to the authority when it is considering its budget and council tax. The report must deal with the robustness of the estimates and the adequacy of the reserves allowed for in the budget proposals, so members will have authoritative advice available to them when they make their decisions. The clause requires members to have regard to the report in making their decisions.
Clauses 26 and 27: Minimum reserves
45. Clause 26 gives the Secretary of State power to determine minimum reserves for local authorities in England by regulation. The National Assembly for Wales is given a corresponding power in relation to local authorities in Wales. The minimum applies to the budget process: authorities would have to ensure that their budget made allowance for reserves at least equal to the minimum. Nothing in the clause would prevent these reserves being used during the year, even if as a result they fell below the minimum. However, if it was forecast that this was likely to happen, clause 27 requires the chief finance officer to report to the authority, at the time the following year's budget and council tax is being considered, to explain the reasons and any action considered necessary to prevent a repetition.
46. In relation to these clauses the Local Government White Paper said (paragraph 10.19 of Part II): 'Our preference would be not to make use of these powers, but we should not hesitate to do so if it emerged that authorities were failing to remedy deficiencies or were running down reserves against the advice of their finance officers'.
Clauses 28 and 29: Budget monitoring: general; Budget monitoring: Greater London Authority
47. Local authorities need to monitor their income and expenditure against their budget, and be ready to take action if overspends or shortfalls in income emerge. These clauses make this a statutory duty. If monitoring establishes that the budgetary situation has deteriorated authorities are required to take such action as they consider necessary. This might include, for instance, action to reduce spending in the rest of the year, or to increase income, or the authority might decide to take no action but to finance the shortfall from reserves.
48. Distinct budget procedures apply to the Greater London Authority and its functional bodies, and so separate provision for these organisations is made in clause 29. The monitoring duty is placed on the functional bodies and (for its own budget only) on the GLA. But, because the GLA is responsible for setting the budgets of the functional bodies, when one of these bodies identifies a budget deterioration the clause requires it to report the fact and the action it proposes to take in response to the Mayor and the Chair of the Assembly.
Clause 30: Authorisation of agreements during the prohibition period
49. Under section 114 of the Local Government Finance Act 1988 a local authority chief finance officer is under a duty to report to the authority in certain circumstances. One of these circumstances is when it appears to the officer that the expenditure of the authority in a financial year is likely to exceed the resources available to meet the expenditure.
50. Under section 115 of the Act such a report has to be considered by the full council within 21 days of its issue. During the period from the issue of the report until the day after the council meeting the authority is prohibited from entering into any new agreements involving expenditure by the authority.
51. This clause amends section 115 to allow the chief finance officer to except certain agreements from this prohibition. The exception applies to agreements which the officer considers likely to deal with the situation that led to the report being made or prevent it happening again. To benefit from the exception an agreement has to be authorised in writing by the chief finance officer, who must state why it is considered the agreement is eligible for exemption.
PART 3: GRANTS ETC
Chapter 1: Expenditure Grant
Clauses 31 to 35: Expenditure grants
52. This new wide-ranging power will enable any Minister to make a grant for any purpose, capital or revenue, to any local authority. Save for in Wales, Treasury consent will be needed in all cases to the making of the grants. The power should largely eliminate the need in future legislation for any further specific grant-making powers. It is designed to allow authorities more flexibility in the use of resources than some existing specific powers, which constrain their use. It is also expected to provide a more convenient means of delivering a number of grants currently made under existing powers. The new power will be used, for example, to make grants in connection with service improvements by local authorities which have entered into local Public Service Agreements with the Government.
53. Grants may be made under this power to a class or category of authority. For example grants may be made to authorities by reference to categories as set out in an Order made under clause 99(4). The conditions applied to individual grants may be differentiated by reference to these categories or may be different for an individual authority.
Chapter 2: Other Grants etc
Clauses 36 and 37: Best value grant: parishes, Best value grant: communities
54. In the 2001 Local Government White Paper, the Government announced that, when legislation permitted, it would pay a grant of £30,000 per year to each 'best value' parish in England. It stated that the grant is intended to cover audit costs and the corporate costs of carrying out work relating to best value, such as the preparation of performance plans and management of reviews. It stated also that the costs of separate best value inspections would continue to be supported through the Audit Commission.
55. The Welsh Assembly has commissioned a research study into the role and responsibilities of community councils in Wales. This may result in some community councils taking part in the Wales Programme for Improvement which is an in-depth assessment by each authority of its own fitness to achieve continuous improvement across all of its functions. The requirements of the Wales Programme for Improvement are set out in The Local Government (Whole Authority Analyses and Improvement Plans)(Wales) Order 2002, SI 2002 No. 886 (W.101). The basis for this in primary legislation is sections 3-6 of the Local Government Act 1999
|© Parliamentary copyright 2002||Prepared: 26 November 2002|