House of Commons portcullis
House of Commons
Session 2002 - 03
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament

Extradition Bill


Extradition Bill
Part 2 — Extradition to category 2 territories

    40

 

 77    Initial stages of extradition hearing

     (1)    This section applies if a person alleged to be the person whose extradition is

requested appears or is brought before the appropriate judge for the

extradition hearing.

     (2)    The judge must decide whether the documents sent to him under section 69

5

consist of (or include)—

           (a)           the documents referred to in section 69(9);

           (b)           particulars of the person whose extradition is requested;

           (c)           particulars of the offence specified in the request;

           (d)           in the case of a person accused of an offence, a warrant for his arrest

10

issued in the category 2 territory;

           (e)           in the case of a person alleged to be unlawfully at large after conviction

of an offence, a certificate issued in the category 2 territory of the

conviction and (if he has been sentenced) of the sentence.

     (3)    If the judge decides the question in subsection (2) in the negative he must order

15

the person’s discharge.

     (4)    If the judge decides that question in the affirmative he must decide whether—

           (a)           the person appearing or brought before him is the person whose

extradition is requested;

           (b)           the offence specified in the request is an extradition offence;

20

           (c)           copies of the documents sent to the judge under section 69 have been

served on the person.

     (5)    If the judge decides any of the questions in subsection (4) in the negative he

must order the person’s discharge.

     (6)    If the judge decides those questions in the affirmative he must proceed under

25

section 78.

     (7)    The reference in subsection (2)(d) to a warrant for a person’s arrest includes a

reference to a judicial document authorising his arrest.

 78    Bars to extradition

     (1)    If the judge is required to proceed under this section he must decide whether

30

the person’s extradition to the category 2 territory is barred by reason of—

           (a)           the rule against double jeopardy;

           (b)           extraneous considerations;

           (c)           the passage of time;

           (d)           hostage-taking considerations.

35

     (2)    Sections 79 to 82 apply for the interpretation of subsection (1).

     (3)    If the judge decides any of the questions in subsection (1) in the affirmative he

must order the person’s discharge.

     (4)    If the judge decides those questions in the negative and the person is accused

of the commission of the extradition offence but is not alleged to be unlawfully

40

at large after conviction of it, the judge must proceed under section 83.

     (5)    If the judge decides those questions in the negative and the person is alleged to

be unlawfully at large after conviction of the extradition offence, the judge

must proceed under section 84.

 

 

Extradition Bill
Part 2 — Extradition to category 2 territories

    41

 

 79    Rule against double jeopardy

A person’s extradition to a category 2 territory is barred by reason of the rule

against double jeopardy if (and only if) it appears that he would be entitled to

be discharged under any rule of law relating to previous acquittal or conviction

if he were charged with the extradition offence in the part of the United

5

Kingdom where the judge exercises jurisdiction.

 80    Extraneous considerations

A person’s extradition to a category 2 territory is barred by reason of

extraneous considerations if (and only if) it appears that—

           (a)           the request for his extradition (though purporting to be made on

10

account of the extradition offence) is in fact made for the purpose of

prosecuting or punishing him on account of his race, religion,

nationality or political opinions, or

           (b)           if extradited he might be prejudiced at his trial or punished, detained

or restricted in his personal liberty by reason of his race, religion,

15

nationality or political opinions.

 81    Passage of time

A person’s extradition to a category 2 territory is barred by reason of the

passage of time if (and only if) it appears that it would be unjust or oppressive

to extradite him by reason of the passage of time since he is alleged to have

20

committed the extradition offence or since he is alleged to have become

unlawfully at large (as the case may be).

 82    Hostage-taking considerations

     (1)    A person’s extradition to a category 2 territory is barred by reason of hostage-

taking considerations if (and only if) the territory is a party to the Hostage-

25

taking Convention and it appears that—

           (a)           if extradited he might be prejudiced at his trial because communication

between him and the appropriate authorities would not be possible,

and

           (b)           the act or omission constituting the extradition offence also constitutes

30

an offence under section 1 of the Taking of Hostages Act 1982 (c. 28) or

an attempt to commit such an offence.

     (2)    The appropriate authorities are the authorities of the territory which are

entitled to exercise rights of protection in relation to him.

     (3)    A certificate issued by the Secretary of State that a territory is a party to the

35

Hostage-taking Convention is conclusive evidence of that fact for the purposes

of subsection (1).

     (4)    The Hostage-taking Convention is the International Convention against the

Taking of Hostages opened for signature at New York on 18 December 1979.

 83    Case where person has not been convicted

40

     (1)    If the judge is required to proceed under this section he must decide whether

there is evidence which would be sufficient to make a case requiring an answer

 

 

Extradition Bill
Part 2 — Extradition to category 2 territories

    42

 

     (1)    by the person if the proceedings were the summary trial of an information

against him.

     (2)    In deciding the question in subsection (1) the judge must treat a statement

made by a person in a document as admissible evidence of a fact if—

           (a)           the statement is made by the person to a police officer or another person

5

charged with the duty of investigating offences or charging offenders,

and

           (b)           direct oral evidence by the person of the fact would be admissible.

     (3)    A summary in a document of a statement made by a person must be treated as

a statement made by the person in the document for the purposes of subsection

10

(2).

     (4)    If the judge decides the question in subsection (1) in the negative he must order

the person’s discharge.

     (5)    If the judge decides that question in the affirmative he must proceed under

section 86.

15

     (6)    If the judge is required to proceed under this section and the category 2

territory to which extradition is requested is designated for the purposes of this

section by Order in Council—

           (a)           the judge must not decide under subsection (1), and

           (b)           he must proceed under section 86.

20

     (7)    Subsection (1) applies to Scotland with the substitution of “summary

proceedings in respect of an offence alleged to have been committed by the

person (except that for this purpose evidence from a single source shall be

sufficient)” for “the summary trial of an information against him”.

     (8)    Subsection (1) applies to Northern Ireland with the substitution of “the hearing

25

and determination of a complaint” for “the summary trial of an information”.

 84    Case where person has been convicted

     (1)    If the judge is required to proceed under this section he must decide—

           (a)           whether the person was convicted in his presence or in his absence;

           (b)           if he was convicted in his absence, whether he deliberately absented

30

himself from his trial;

           (c)           if he was convicted in his absence and he did not deliberately absent

himself from his trial, whether he would be entitled to a retrial or (on

appeal) to a review amounting to a retrial.

     (2)    The judge must order the person’s discharge if he decides that the person—

35

           (a)           was convicted in his absence,

           (b)           did not deliberately absent himself from his trial, and

           (c)           would not be entitled to a retrial or (on appeal) to a review amounting

to a retrial.

     (3)    The judge must proceed under section 85 if he decides that the person—

40

           (a)           was convicted in his absence,

           (b)           did not deliberately absent himself from his trial, and

           (c)           would be entitled to a retrial or (on appeal) to a review amounting to a

retrial.

 

 

Extradition Bill
Part 2 — Extradition to category 2 territories

    43

 

     (4)    The judge must proceed under section 86 if he decides that the person—

           (a)           was convicted in his presence, or

           (b)           was convicted in his absence and deliberately absented himself from

his trial.

 85    Conviction in person’s absence

5

     (1)    If the judge is required to proceed under this section he must decide whether

there is evidence which would be sufficient to make a case requiring an answer

by the person if the proceedings were the summary trial of an information

against him.

     (2)    In deciding the question in subsection (1) the judge must treat a statement

10

made by a person in a document as admissible evidence of a fact if—

           (a)           the statement is made by the person to a police officer or another person

charged with the duty of investigating offences or charging offenders,

and

           (b)           direct oral evidence by the person of the fact would be admissible.

15

     (3)    A summary in a document of a statement made by a person must be treated as

a statement made by the person in the document for the purposes of subsection

(2).

     (4)    If the judge decides the question in subsection (1) in the negative he must order

the person’s discharge.

20

     (5)    If the judge decides that question in the affirmative he must proceed under

section 86.

     (6)    If the judge is required to proceed under this section and the category 2

territory to which extradition is requested is designated for the purposes of this

section by Order in Council—

25

           (a)           the judge must not decide under subsection (1), and

           (b)           he must proceed under section 86.

     (7)    Subsection (1) applies to Scotland with the substitution of “summary

proceedings in respect of an offence alleged to have been committed by the

person (except that for this purpose evidence from a single source shall be

30

sufficient)” for “the summary trial of an information against him”.

     (8)    Subsection (1) applies to Northern Ireland with the substitution of “the hearing

and determination of a complaint” for “the summary trial of an information”.

 86    Human rights

     (1)    If the judge is required to proceed under this section (by virtue of section 83, 84

35

or 85) he must decide whether the person’s extradition would be compatible

with the Convention rights within the meaning of the Human Rights Act 1998

(c. 42).

     (2)    If the judge decides the question in subsection (1) in the negative he must order

the person’s discharge.

40

     (3)    If the judge decides that question in the affirmative he must send the case to the

Secretary of State for his decision whether the person is to be extradited.

 

 

 
previous section contents continue
 
House of Commons home page Houses of Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Revised 22 January 2003