House of Commons portcullis
House of Commons
Session 2002 - 03
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament

Criminal Justice Bill


Criminal Justice Bill
Part 11 — Evidence
Chapter 2 — Hearsay evidence

    67

 

 109   Credibility

     (1)    This section applies if in criminal proceedings—

           (a)           a statement not made in oral evidence in the proceedings is admitted as

evidence of a matter stated, and

           (b)           the maker of the statement does not give oral evidence in connection

5

with the subject matter of the statement.

     (2)    In such a case—

           (a)           any evidence which (if he had given such evidence) would have been

admissible as relevant to his credibility as a witness is so admissible in

the proceedings;

10

           (b)           evidence may with the court’s leave be given of any matter which (if he

had given such evidence) could have been put to him in cross-

examination as relevant to his credibility as a witness but of which

evidence could not have been adduced by the cross-examining party;

           (c)           evidence tending to prove that he made (at whatever time) any other

15

statement inconsistent with the statement admitted as evidence is

admissible for the purpose of showing that he contradicted himself.

     (3)    If as a result of evidence admitted under this section an allegation is made

against the maker of a statement, the court may permit a party to lead

additional evidence of such description as the court may specify for the

20

purposes of denying or answering the allegation.

     (4)    In the case of a statement in a document which is admitted as evidence under

section 102 each person who, in order for the statement to be admissible, must

have supplied or received the information concerned or created or received the

document or part concerned is to be treated as the maker of the statement for

25

the purposes of subsections (1) to (3) above.

 110   Stopping the case where evidence is unconvincing

     (1)    If on a defendant’s trial before a judge and jury for an offence the court is

satisfied at any time after the close of the case for the prosecution that—

           (a)           the case against the defendant is based wholly or partly on a statement

30

not made in oral evidence in the proceedings, and

           (b)           the evidence provided by the statement is so unconvincing that,

considering its importance to the case against the defendant, his

conviction of the offence would be unsafe,

                   the court must either direct the jury to acquit the defendant of the offence or, if

35

it considers that there ought to be a retrial, discharge the jury.

     (2)    Where—

           (a)           a jury is directed under subsection (1) to acquit a defendant of an

offence, and

           (b)           the circumstances are such that, apart from this subsection, the

40

defendant could if acquitted of that offence be found guilty of another

offence,

                   the defendant may not be found guilty of that other offence if the court is

satisfied as mentioned in subsection (1) in respect of it.

     (3)    If—

45

           (a)           a jury is required to determine under section 4A(2) of the Criminal

Procedure (Insanity) Act 1964 (c. 84) whether a person charged on an

 

 

Criminal Justice Bill
Part 11 — Evidence
Chapter 2 — Hearsay evidence

    68

 

           (a)           indictment with an offence did the act or made the omission charged,

and

           (b)           the court is satisfied as mentioned in subsection (1) above at any time

after the close of the case for the prosecution that—

                  (i)                 the case against the defendant is based wholly or partly on a

5

statement not made in oral evidence in the proceedings, and

                  (ii)                the evidence provided by the statement is so unconvincing that,

considering its importance to the case against the person, a

finding that he did the act or made the omission would be

unsafe,

10

                   the court must either direct the jury to acquit the defendant of the offence or, if

it considers that there ought to be a rehearing, discharge the jury.

     (4)    This section does not prejudice any other power a court may have to direct a

jury to acquit a person of an offence or to discharge a jury.

 111   Court’s general discretion to exclude evidence

15

     (1)    In criminal proceedings the court may refuse to admit a statement as evidence

of a matter stated if—

           (a)           the statement was made otherwise than in oral evidence in the

proceedings, and

           (b)           the court is satisfied that the case for excluding the statement, taking

20

account of the danger that to admit it would result in undue waste of

time, substantially outweighs the case for admitting it, taking account

of the value of the evidence.

     (2)    Nothing in this Chapter prejudices—

           (a)           any power of a court to exclude evidence under section 78 of the Police

25

and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (c. 60) (exclusion of unfair evidence),

or

           (b)           any other power of a court to exclude evidence at its discretion

(whether by preventing questions from being put or otherwise).

Miscellaneous

30

 112   Expert evidence: preparatory work

     (1)    This section applies if—

           (a)           a statement has been prepared for the purposes of criminal

proceedings,

           (b)           the person who prepared the statement had or may reasonably be

35

supposed to have had personal knowledge of the matters stated,

           (c)           notice is given under the appropriate rules that another person (the

expert) will in evidence given in the proceedings orally or under section

9 of the Criminal Justice Act 1967 (c. 80) base an opinion or inference on

the statement, and

40

           (d)           the notice gives the name of the person who prepared the statement

and the nature of the matters stated.

     (2)    In evidence given in the proceedings the expert may base an opinion or

inference on the statement.

 

 

Criminal Justice Bill
Part 11 — Evidence
Chapter 2 — Hearsay evidence

    69

 

     (3)    If evidence based on the statement is given under subsection (2) the statement

is to be treated as evidence of what it states.

     (4)    This section does not apply if the court, on an application by a party to the

proceedings, orders that it is not in the interests of justice that it should apply.

     (5)    The matters to be considered by the court in deciding whether to make an

5

order under subsection (4) include—

           (a)           the expense of calling as a witness the person who prepared the

statement;

           (b)           whether relevant evidence could be given by that person which could

not be given by the expert;

10

           (c)           whether that person can reasonably be expected to remember the

matters stated well enough to give oral evidence of them.

     (6)    Subsections (1) to (5) apply to a statement prepared for the purposes of a

criminal investigation as they apply to a statement prepared for the purposes

of criminal proceedings, and in such a case references to the proceedings are to

15

criminal proceedings arising from the investigation.

     (7)    The appropriate rules are rules made—

           (a)           under section 81 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (c. 60)

(advance notice of expert evidence in Crown Court), or

           (b)           under section 144 of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980 (c. 43) by virtue

20

of section 20(3) of the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996

(c. 25) (advance notice of expert evidence in magistrates’ courts).

 113   Confessions

     (1)    In the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 the following section is inserted

after section 76—

25

       “76A            Confessions may be given in evidence for co-accused

           (1)           In any proceedings a confession made by an accused person may be

given in evidence for another person charged in the same proceedings

(a co-accused) in so far as it is relevant to any matter in issue in the

proceedings and is not excluded by the court in pursuance of this

30

section.

           (2)           If, in any proceedings where a co-accused proposes to give in evidence

a confession made by an accused person, it is represented to the court

that the confession was or may have been obtained—

                  (a)                 by oppression of the person who made it; or

35

                  (b)                 in consequence of anything said or done which was likely, in

the circumstances existing at the time, to render unreliable any

confession which might be made by him in consequence

thereof,

                         the court shall not allow the confession to be given in evidence for the

40

co-accused except in so far as it is proved to the court on the balance of

probabilities that the confession (notwithstanding that it may be true)

was not so obtained.

           (3)           Before allowing a confession made by an accused person to be given in

evidence for a co-accused in any proceedings, the court may of its own

45

 

 

Criminal Justice Bill
Part 11 — Evidence
Chapter 2 — Hearsay evidence

    70

 

           (3)           motion require the fact that the confession was not obtained as

mentioned in subsection (2) above to be proved in the proceedings on

the balance of probabilities.

           (4)           The fact that a confession is wholly or partly excluded in pursuance of

this section shall not affect the admissibility in evidence—

5

                  (a)                 of any facts discovered as a result of the confession; or

                  (b)                 where the confession is relevant as showing that the accused

speaks, writes or expresses himself in a particular way, of so

much of the confession as is necessary to show that he does so.

           (5)           Evidence that a fact to which this subsection applies was discovered as

10

a result of a statement made by an accused person shall not be

admissible unless evidence of how it was discovered is given by him or

on his behalf.

           (6)           Subsection (5) above applies—

                  (a)                 to any fact discovered as a result of a confession which is wholly

15

excluded in pursuance of this section; and

                  (b)                 to any fact discovered as a result of a confession which is partly

so excluded, if the fact is discovered as a result of the excluded

part of the confession.

           (7)           In this section “oppression” includes torture, inhuman or degrading

20

treatment, and the use or threat of violence (whether or not amounting

to torture).”

     (2)    Subject to subsection (1), nothing in this Chapter makes a confession by a

defendant admissible if it would not be admissible under section 76 of the

Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (c. 60).

25

     (3)    In subsection (2) “confession” has the meaning given by section 82 of that Act.

 114   Representations other than by a person

     (1)    Where a representation of any fact—

           (a)           is made otherwise than by a person, but

           (b)           depends for its accuracy on information supplied (directly or

30

indirectly) by a person,

            the representation is not admissible in criminal proceedings as evidence of the

fact unless it is proved that the information was accurate.

     (2)    Subsection (1) does not affect the operation of the presumption that a

mechanical device has been properly set or calibrated.

35

 115   Depositions

In Schedule 3 to the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 (c. 37), sub-paragraph (4) of

paragraph 5 is omitted (power of the court to overrule an objection to a

deposition being read as evidence by virtue of that paragraph).

 116   Evidence at retrial

40

For paragraphs 1 and 1A of Schedule 2 to the Criminal Appeal Act 1968 (c. 19)

(oral evidence and use of transcripts etc at retrials under that Act) there is

substituted—

 

 

 
previous section contents continue
 
House of Commons home page Houses of Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2003
Revised 6 March 2003