Amendments proposed to the Criminal Justice Bill, As Amended - continued House of Commons

back to previous text
   

Mr Oliver Letwin
Mr Dominic Grieve
Mr Nick Hawkins
Mr Mark Francois
Simon Hughes
Mr David Heath

Annette Brooke

55

Page     5,     line     36     [Clause     7],     at end insert—

    '(7A)   No code or revised code issued under this section shall have effect until approved by resolution of each House of Parliament.'.


   

Simon Hughes
Mr David Heath
Annette Brooke

169

Page     6,     line     2,     leave out Clause 9.

   

Mr Oliver Letwin
Mr Dominic Grieve
Mr Nick Hawkins
Mr Mark Francois

57

Page     6,     line     7     [Clause     9],     leave out second 'a' and insert 'such'.

   

Mr Oliver Letwin
Mr Dominic Grieve
Mr Nick Hawkins
Mr Mark Francois

58

Page     6,     line     7     [Clause     9],     leave out second 'drug' and insert 'drugs'.

   

Mr Oliver Letwin
Mr Dominic Grieve
Mr Nick Hawkins
Mr Mark Francois

59

Page     6,     line     8     [Clause     9],     at end insert 'as are identified as cannabis or cannabis resin'.

   

Simon Hughes
Mr David Heath
Annette Brooke

170

Page     6,     line     41     [Clause     10],     leave out 'different' and insert 'higher'.


   

Simon Hughes
Mr David Heath
Annette Brooke

171

Page     12,     line     20     [Clause     16],     leave out 'not' and insert 'only'.

   

Simon Hughes
Mr David Heath
Annette Brooke

172

Page     12,     line     20     [Clause     16],     leave out 'unless' and insert 'if'.


   

Mr Secretary Blunkett

72

Page     18,     line     26     [Clause     28],     after 'evidence', insert 'or an abuse of process'.


   

Mr Secretary Blunkett

73

Page     19     [Clause     28],     leave out lines 1 to 3.

   

Mr Secretary Blunkett

74

Page     19,     line     9     [Clause     28],     after 'prosecutor', insert 'either—

 (a)'.

   

Mr Secretary Blunkett

75

Page     19,     line     10     [Clause     28],     at end insert ', or

(b) a statement of the kind mentioned in subsection (3A)'.

   

Mr Secretary Blunkett

76

Page     19,     line     14     [Clause     28],     at end insert—

    '(3A)   Instead of an updated defence statement, the accused may give a written statement stating that he has no changes to make to the defence statement which was given under section 5 or 6.'

   

Mr Secretary Blunkett

77

Page     19,     line     16     [Clause     28],     after 'give', insert 'either'.

   

Mr Secretary Blunkett

78

Page     19,     line     16     [Clause     28],     after 'statement', insert 'or a statement of the kind mentioned in subsection (3A)'.

   

Mr Charles Kennedy
Mr Menzies Campbell
Simon Hughes
Mr David Heath
Annette Brooke
Mr Andrew Stunell

Mrs Claire Curtis-Thomas

27

Page     19,     line     21,     leave out Clause 29.

   

Mr Secretary Blunkett

79

Page     19,     line     26     [Clause     29],     leave out 'give or call any evidence at' and insert 'call any persons (other than himself) as witnesses at his'.

   

Mr Oliver Letwin
Mr Dominic Grieve
Mr Nick Hawkins
Mr Mark Francois

60

Page     19,     line     26     [Clause     29],     leave out 'give or'.

   

Mr Charles Kennedy
Mr Menzies Campbell
Simon Hughes
Mr David Heath
Annette Brooke
Mr Andrew Stunell

28

Page     19,     line     26,     [Clause     29],     leave out from 'and' to end of line 35 and insert—

    '(2A)   Names and addresses of defence witnesses may only be disclosed under section (1) with the express and prior consent of the witness concerned.'.

   

Mr Secretary Blunkett

80

Page     19,     line     28     [Clause     29],     after 'each', insert 'such'.

   

Mr Secretary Blunkett

81

Page     19,     line     29     [Clause     29],     leave out '(other than the accused himself)'.

   

Mr Secretary Blunkett

82

Page     19,     line     32     [Clause     29],     at end insert 'such'.

   

Mr Secretary Blunkett

83

Page     19,     line     41     [Clause     29],     after 'person', insert '(other than himself)'.


   

Mr Oliver Letwin
Mr Dominic Grieve
Mr Nick Hawkins
Mr Mark Francois
Mrs Claire Curtis-Thomas

53

Page     20,     line     6,     leave out Clause 30.

   

Mr Secretary Blunkett

84

Page     20,     line     23     [Clause     31],     leave out subsection (1) and insert—

    '(1)   Where an accused's solicitor purports to give on behalf of the accused—

(a) a defence statement under section 5, 6 or 6B, or

(b) a statement of the kind mentioned in section 6B(3A),

    that statement shall, unless the contrary is proved, be deemed to be given with the authority of the accused.'.


   

Mr Secretary Blunkett

85

Page     21,     line     7     [Clause     31],     at end insert—

'(c) where he has given both an initial defence statement and a statement of the kind mentioned in section 6B(3A), to the initial defence statement.'.


   

Mr Secretary Blunkett

86

Page     22,     line     30     [Clause     34],     after 'give', insert 'either'.

   

Mr Secretary Blunkett

87

Page     22,     line     30     [Clause     34],     at end insert 'or a statement of the kind mentioned in subsection (3A) of that section'.

   

Mr Secretary Blunkett

88

Page     22,     line     32     [Clause     34],     after 'statement', insert 'or a statement of the kind mentioned in section 6B(3A)'.


   

Mr Secretary Blunkett

89

Page     23,     line     3     [Clause     34],     leave out 'giving'.

   

Mr Secretary Blunkett

90

Page     23,     line     15     [Clause     34],     after 'witness', insert '(other than himself)'.

   

Mr Secretary Blunkett

91

Page     23,     line     21     [Clause     34],     at end insert—

    '(5A)   Where—

(a) this section applies by virtue of subsection (2)(f)(ii) (including that provision as it applies by virtue of subsection (3)(b)), and

(b) the matter which was not mentioned is a point of law (including any point as to the admissibility of evidence or an abuse of process) or an authority,

    comment by another party under subsection (5)(a) may be made only with the leave of the court.'.

   

Mr Secretary Blunkett

92

Page     23,     line     36     [Clause     34],     at end insert—

    '(9A)   Where the accused has given a statement of the kind mentioned in section 6B(3A), then, for the purposes of subsections (2)(f)(ii) and (iv), the question as to whether there has been a breach of the requirements imposed by or under section 6A or a failure to comply with section 6A(2)(a) or (b) shall be determined—

(a) by reference to the state of affairs at the time when that statement was given, and

(b) as if the defence statement was given at the same time as that statement.'.

   

Mr Secretary Blunkett

93

Page     23,     line     47     [Clause     34],     at end insert—

'(iii) where he has given both an initial defence statement and a statement of the kind mentioned in section 6B(3A), to the initial defence statement;'.


NEW CLAUSES RELATING TO PART 7

Applications by prosecution for complex and lengthy trial to be conducted before a jury of experts

   

Mr Oliver Letwin
Mr Dominic Grieve
Mr Nick Hawkins
Mr Mark Francois

NC1

To move the following Clause:—

    '(1)   This section applies where one or more defendants are to be tried on indictment for one or more offences.

    (2)   The prosecution or the defendant may apply to a judge of the Crown Court for the trial to be conducted before a jury of experts.

    (3)   If an application under subsection (2) is made and the judge is satisfied that both of the following two conditions are fulfilled he must make an order that the trial be conducted before a jury of experts, but if he is not so satisfied he must refuse the application.

    (4)   The first condition is that the complexity of the trial and its length—

(a) is likely to make the trial so burdensome to the members of a jury hearing the trial that it is necessary in the interests of justice for the trial to be conducted before a jury of experts.

(b) would be likely to place an excessive burden upon the life of a typical juror.

    (5)   The second condition is that the complexity and length will be attributable—

(a) to the fact that the issues likely to be material to the verdict of a jury hearing the trial relate to arrangements, transactions or records of a financial or commercial nature or which relate to property, and

(b) to the likely volume of evidence relating to those issues.

    (6)   In deciding whether or not he is satisfied that both of those two conditions are fulfilled, the judge must have regard to any steps which might reasonably be taken to reduce the complexity or length of the trial (or both).

    (7)   But a step is not to be regarded as reasonable if it would significantly disadvantage the prosecution or the defendant.'.

 
previous section contents continue
 
House of Commons home page Houses of Parliament home page House of Lords home page Search page Enquiries index

©Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 2 Apr 2003