Amendments proposed to the Criminal Justice Bill, As Amended - continued House of Commons

back to previous text

Expert juries

   

Mr Oliver Letwin
Mr Dominic Grieve
Mr Nick Hawkins
Mr Mark Francois

NC2

To move the following Clause:—

    '(1)   A jury of experts shall be constituted by 12 members drawn from the following professional bodies—

      (a) The Royal Institute of Chartered Accountants;

      (b) The Society of Actuaries.

    (2)   The Lord Chancellor may by order amend the list of professional bodies from which expert jurors are drawn.

    (3)   The Lord Chancellor shall maintain a list of eligible persons willing to serve as expert jurors.

    (4)   The Lord Chancellor may pay to any expert juror such remuneration as he may determine.'.


Application by defendant for trial to be conducted without jury

   

Vera Baird
Tony Wright
Mr Robert Marshall-Andrews
Mr Neil Gerrard
Mr Mark Fisher
Denzil Davies

Mr Austin Mitchell

NC23

To move the following Clause:—

    '(1)   This section applies where one or more defendants are to be tried on indictment for one or more offences.

    (2)   The defendant, or any of the defendants, may apply to a judge of the Crown Court for the trial to be conducted without a jury.

    (3)   The judge may make an order that the trial is to be conducted without a jury if satisfied that subsection (4) applies.

    (4)   This subsection applies if the judge is satisfied there is a substantial risk that the defendant will not receive a fair trial if tried by a jury.

    (5)   When deciding whether the subsection (4) applies the judge shall give consideration to the following—

      (a) the nature of the case;

      (b) any submissions made by the prosecution or the defence;

      (c) any other relevant factors.

    (6)   Before making any submissions under subsection (5)(b) the prosecution shall take into consideration the wishes and interests of any witnesses.

    (7)   If two or more defendants are to be tried and any of them opposes an application under subsection (2) then subsection (4) will not apply.'.


   

Mr Oliver Letwin
Mr Dominic Grieve
Mr Nick Hawkins
Mr Mark Francois
Vera Baird
Tony Wright

Mr Robert Marshall-AndrewsMr Neil GerrardMr Mark Fisher
Denzil DaviesDerek WyattPaul Flynn
Mr Kelvin HopkinsChris McCaffertyMr Austin Mitchell

1

Page     24,     line     12,     leave out Clause 36.

   

Mrs Claire Curtis-Thomas

141

Page     24,     line     15     [Clause     36],     at beginning insert 'Subject to subsection (2A)'.

   

Mrs Claire Curtis-Thomas

111

Page     24,     line     16     [Clause     36],     at end insert—

    '(2A)   In a case of serious historical complex abuse, the defendant may apply to a judge of the Crown Court for the trial to be conducted with an expert jury.

    (2B)   The Secretary of State shall by order define the qualifications or experience necessary for a person to serve on a jury in a case of serious historical complex abuse.'.

   

Mrs Claire Curtis-Thomas

142

Page     24,     line     16     [Clause     36],     at end insert—

    '(2A)   A defendant who is charged with a sexual offence which was investigated as part of a complex historical abuse case may apply to a judge of the Crown Court for the trial to be conducted by an expert jury appointed in accordance with guidance issued by the Lord Chancellor as to the qualifications and experience necessary for a person to serve on such an expert jury.'.

   

Mrs Claire Curtis-Thomas

112

Page     24,     line     17     [Clause     36],     after '(2)', insert 'or (2A).'.


   

Mr Oliver Letwin
Mr Dominic Grieve
Mr Nick Hawkins
Mr Mark Francois
Mr Charles Kennedy
Mr Menzies Campbell

Simon HughesVera BairdTony Wright
Mr Robert Marshall-AndrewsMr Neil GerrardMr Mark Fisher
Denzil DaviesDerek WyattPaul Flynn
Mr Kelvin HopkinsChris McCaffertyMr Austin Mitchell

2

Page     25,     line     10,     leave out Clause 37.

   

Mrs Claire Curtis-Thomas

143

Page     25,     line     13     [Clause     37],     at end insert 'other than a sexual offence which was investigated as part of a complex historical abuse case.'.

   

Mrs Claire Curtis-Thomas

113

Page     25,     line     13     [Clause     37],     at end insert—

    '(1A)   This section does not apply in a case of serious historical complex abuse.'.

   

Mr Oliver Letwin
Mr Dominic Grieve
Mr Nick Hawkins
Mr Mark Francois
Mr Charles Kennedy
Mr Menzies Campbell

Simon HughesVera BairdTony Wright
Mr Robert Marshall-AndrewsMr Neil GerrardMr Mark Fisher
Denzil DaviesDerek WyattPaul Flynn
Mr Kelvin HopkinsChris McCafferty

3

Page     25,     line     38,     leave out Clause 38.


   

Vera Baird
Tony Wright
Mr Robert Marshall-Andrews
Mr Neil Gerrard
Mr Mark Fisher
Denzil Davies

Mr Austin Mitchell

128

Page     26,     line     1     [Clause     38],     leave out 'satisfied' and insert 'convinced'.

   

Mr Oliver Letwin
Mr Dominic Grieve
Mr Nick Hawkins
Mr Mark Francois

4

Page     26,     line     19     [Clause     39],     leave out 'under sections 36 to 38'.

   

Mr Oliver Letwin
Mr Dominic Grieve
Mr Nick Hawkins
Mr Mark Francois

5

Page     26,     line     20     [Clause     39],     leave out from 'applies' to end of line 24 and insert 'to any application under section (Applications by prosecution for complex and lengthy trial to be conducted before a jury of experts) above.'.

   

Mr Oliver Letwin
Mr Dominic Grieve
Mr Nick Hawkins
Mr Mark Francois

6

Page     26,     line     43     [Clause     39],     leave out 'sections 36, 37 or 38' and insert 'section (Applications by prosecution for complex and lengthy trial to be conducted before a jury of experts)'.


   

Mr Oliver Letwin
Mr Dominic Grieve
Mr Nick Hawkins
Mr Mark Francois

7

Page     27,     line     18     [Clause     39],     leave out 'sections 36, 37 or 38' and insert 'section (Applications by prosecution for complex and lengthy trial to be conducted before a jury of experts)'.

   

Mr Oliver Letwin
Mr Dominic Grieve
Mr Nick Hawkins
Mr Mark Francois

8

Page     27,     line     28     [Clause     39],     leave out '(or partly because)'.

   

Mr Oliver Letwin
Mr Dominic Grieve
Mr Nick Hawkins
Mr Mark Francois

9

Page     27,     line     28     [Clause     39],     leave out 'appears to have' and insert 'has'.

   

Mr Oliver Letwin
Mr Dominic Grieve
Mr Nick Hawkins
Mr Mark Francois

10

Page     27,     line     35     [Clause     40],     leave out from 'must' to end of line 36 and insert 'terminate the trial'.

   

Mr Oliver Letwin
Mr Dominic Grieve
Mr Nick Hawkins
Mr Mark Francois

11

Page     27,     line     37     [Clause     40],     leave out subsection (4).

   

Mr Oliver Letwin
Mr Dominic Grieve
Mr Nick Hawkins
Mr Mark Francois

12

Page     27,     line     39     [Clause     40],     leave out from '(4)' and insert '(3)'.

   

Mr Oliver Letwin
Mr Dominic Grieve
Mr Nick Hawkins
Mr Mark Francois

13

Page     27,     line     41     [Clause     40],     leave out from 'that' to end of line 44 and insert—

    'if the retrial were to take place with a jury there is a real and present danger that jury tampering would again occur and that either,

      (a) (i) the danger of jury tampering is such that it would be necessary to provide police protection for the members of the jury hearing the trial and

      (ii) the level and duration of that protection would be likely to place an excessive burden upon the life of a typical juror, or

    (b)   notwithstanding any steps (including the provision of police protection) which might reasonably be taken to prevent jury tampering the likelihood that it would take place was so high to make it necessary in the interests of justice for the trial to be conducted without a jury.'.


   

Mr Oliver Letwin
Mr Dominic Grieve
Mr Nick Hawkins
Mr Mark Francois

14

Page     28,     line     3     [Clause     40],     leave out subsection (7) and insert—

    '(7)   Any new trial by judge alone must take place in front of a different judge.'.

   

Mr Oliver Letwin
Mr Dominic Grieve
Mr Nick Hawkins
Mr Mark Francois

15

Page     28,     line     31     [Clause     42],     leave out subsection (1).

   

Mr Oliver Letwin
Mr Dominic Grieve
Mr Nick Hawkins
Mr Mark Francois

16

Page     28,     line     33     [Clause     42],     leave out 'trial' and insert 're-trial'.

   

Mr Oliver Letwin
Mr Dominic Grieve
Mr Nick Hawkins
Mr Mark Francois

17

Page     28,     line     34     [Clause     42],     leave out 'be continued' and insert 'take place'.


   

Mrs Claire Curtis-Thomas

114

Page     39,     line     31     [Clause     61],     at end add 'or (anonymity of defendants in sexual offence cases)'.


   

Mr Oliver Letwin
Mr Dominic Grieve
Mr Nick Hawkins
Mr Mark Francois

18

Page     41,     line     7     [Clause     63],     leave out 'a qualifying offence' and insert 'murder or rape, contrary to section 1 of the Sexual Offences Act 1956'.



 
previous section contents continue
 
House of Commons home page Houses of Parliament home page House of Lords home page Search page Enquiries index

©Parliamentary copyright 2003
Prepared 2 Apr 2003