18 Nov 2002 : Column 7WS
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (Mr. Tony McNulty): Following consideration of proposals made in a consultation paper issued in July 2001, the Housing Revenue Account (HRA) subsidy system was changed from 20022003 to support the policy of social rent reform announced in the December 2000 housing policy statementQuality and Choice: A Decent Home for All.
We consulted local authorities and others in summer 2002 on further proposals to adjust the HRA subsidy system to take account of aspects of the new policy that it was not possible to address in 20022003. We also consulted on proposals about the treatment of service charges within the HRA subsidy system. There was general support for our objectives, and the HRA subsidy system for 20032004 will be adjusted as necessary to reflect the consultation proposals.
For 20032004, we will increase the resources per dwelling available at the national level for management allowances by about 8.1 per cent and for maintenance by about 5.7 per cent in cash terms, of which about 2.2 per cent will be to correct for technical changes to the subsidy system. This is an increase on the amounts proposed in the previous Spending Review, and will provide authorities with an extra #63 per dwelling compared with 200203.
The Government is committed to fighting antisocial behaviour. Local Authorities, as social landlords, are essential in winning this battle. We will encourage local authorities to use this real terms cash increase to tackle this blight, through imaginative prevention, enforcement and rehabilitation initiatives.
The Major Repairs Allowance will increase by about 2.5 per cent per dwelling in cash terms at the national level. For subsidy purposes, we are assuming that all local authority rents will be subject to two changes for 20032004. First an increase by about 3.5 per cent from their levels in 20022003. Secondly an adjustment, which for some authorities will increase and for others reduce rents, to move rents a second step towards the formula set out in our policy for rent restructuring. We have assumed that all authorities made a first step towards the formula rent in 20022003.
We have today issued for consultation the drafts of the HRA subsidy and Item 8 determinations for 20032004, as well as the draft general determination of administration of HRA subsidy 2002, which translate these national figures into subsidy allocations for individual housing authorities. Copies of the draft determinations and supporting material are being placed in the Library of the House, and will be available
18 Nov 2002 : Column 8WS
on my Office's web site. These allocations are based on the most up-to-date information available to us from authorities, and may change as that information is refined. Authorities have until 12 December to comment on the draft determinations.
RPG1 sets out the spatial development strategy that encompasses proposals for the development of the region's economy, housing, transport infrastructure, and other land uses. The priority of the strategy is to direct the majority of new development to the built up areas of the Tyne, Wear and Tees conurbations, and adopt a sequential approach to identifying sites for development to ensure that development is located in the most sustainable locations. RPG1 also sets out proposals for the conservation, management and enhancement of the region's natural and cultural environment.
I am pleased that much of the vision, objectives and core strategy of RPG1 carries forward to a great extent what was proposed in the original draft RPG prepared by the Association of North East Councils (ANEC). RPG1 reflects the effective working that was achieved between ANEC, local authorities, the Regional Development Agency, One NorthEast, and other stakeholders, all of whom have made valuable contributions to refine and enhance the original draft guidance. It builds on the inclusive process for preparing RPG that the Government has put in place. Many of the comments received in response to the consultations carried out earlier have made a positive contribution to the overall strategy for sustainable development and have been taken on board.
The Minister of State, (Home Department (Mr. John Denham): In May, my right hon. Friend the Home Secretary commissioned a fundamental review of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) and the accompanying Codes of Practice to be conducted jointly by the Home Office and the Cabinet Office.
The review focused on the basic requirements of PACE and the Codes that underlie police procedures with particular emphasis on, but not limited to, those aspects that govern detention and the custody process. In particular, the review team was asked to consider whether the Act and the Codes were still the best way of ensuring that the powers of the police are properly exercised and the rights of suspects are adequately protected.
18 Nov 2002 : Column 9WS
The review team has now reported and I have today placed a copy of their report in the Library. The main conclusion of the review is that the basic PACE approach is sound and still strikes broadly the right balance between the powers of the police and the rights and freedoms of the public. In particular, the review found that the general view of PACE is positive, especially in terms of the way it is viewed as having standardised and professionalised police work. The police have a clear framework within which to operate, whilst the provisions of the Act protect the individual.
However, the review also found that there are aspects of PACE that require updating to reflect changes in society over the years since the legislation was brought into force. Taken together, the review has proposed a challenging programme of change to amend the PACE legislation and the Codes of Practice which the Government has accepted and will take forward as part of its ongoing police reform agenda. This is a vital opportunity to improve the way the police operate and taken together with the measures we have already introduced in the Police Reform Act 2002, will bring about a real difference to the everyday lives of police officers on the front line and consequently to the delivery of services.
|Disablement Pension (100% rates unless otherwise shown)||Rates 2002||Rates 2003|
|(Weekly rates unless otherwise shown)||#||#|
|officer (per annum)||6,356.00||6,465.00|
|over 50% but not over 70%||12.55||12.75|
|over 70% but not over 90%||17.85||18.15|
|specified minor injury (min.)||775.00||788.00|
|specified minor injury (max.)||5,792.00||5,890.00|
|unspecified minor injury (min.)||321.00||326.00|
|unspecified minor injury (max.)||7,532.00||7,660.00|
|adult dependency increase||42.45||43.15|
|increase for first child||9.85||10.00|
|increase for subsequent children||11.55||11.75|
|Constant attendance allowance|
|full day rate||46.00||46.80|
|part day rate||23.00||23.40|
|Allowance for lowered standard of occupation (max)||45.92||46.72|
|Exceptionally severe disablement allowance||46.00||46.80|
|Severe disablement occupational allowance||23.00||23.40|
|Clothing allowance (per annum)||157.00||160.00|
|Educational allowance (per annum) (max)||120.00||120.00|
|War widow's pension|
|Childless widow(er) u-40 (other ranks)||22.12||22.50|
|Childless widow(er)-u-40 officer (p.a. max)||5,689.00||5,786.00|
|(a) age 65 to 69||10.55||10.75|
|(b) age 70 to 79||20.20||20.55|
|(c) age 80 and over||30.05||30.55|
|increase for first child||14.55||14.80|
|increase for subsequent children||16.20||16.50|
|increase for first child||16.50||16.80|
|increase for subsequent children||18.15||18.45|
|Unmarried dependant living as spouse (max)||89.95||91.50|
|Rent allowance (maximum)||34.80||35.40|
|Adult Orphan's pension (maximum)||70.95||72.15|
18 Nov 2002 : Column 10WS