Previous Section Index Home Page


13 Jan 2003 : Column 382W—continued

Fire Service (Radio Network)

Mr. Chope: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister (1) what estimate he has made of the cost to (a) the Government and (b) contractors of the aborted regional fire service replacement radio budget; [90436]

Mr. Raynsford: No figures are available relating to the cost to Government or private sector companies of the fire service regional radio procurement strategy.

44 fire authorities have written to the Office giving preliminary notification of their intention to claim for costs related to the adoption of the national radio strategy. The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister does not expect to receive claims until March 2003.

13 Jan 2003 : Column 383W

Framework guidance on making claims is to be issued by officials shortly. All claims will be considered on merit within the given guidelines. A copy of the Fire Service Circular will be placed in the Library of the House in due course.

Flood Protection

Mr. Lidington: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister if he will make a statement on the impact the introduction of the new local government grant distribution formula will have on local authority budgets for flood defence and coastal protection. [89642]

Mr. Raynsford: The provisional settlement included a small change in the formula used to provide resources through FSS (formerly SSA) for flood defence and coastal protection. Actual budgeting and expenditure remain matters for the authorities themselves.

Green Goddesses

Bob Russell: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister how many Green Goddess fire appliances there are; what is the age of the (a) oldest and (b) newest; and what plans he has to replace them. [90363]

Mr. Raynsford: There are currently 1,027 Green Goddess appliances, including 116 for Scotland. They were all acquired in the mid-1950s. The Government have no current plans to replace the Green Goddesses but a substantial number of more modern appliances have been deployed for use by the military during the current dispute and we will be reviewing their effectiveness.

Housing (Private Rented Sector)

Mrs. Calton: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what plans he has to (a) increase supply and (b) improve standards in the private rented sector, and to enable it to play a bigger role in meeting housing need. [88549]

Mr. McNulty: The Government actively encourage a private rented sector that provides a decent standard of accommodation throughout. The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister will regulate where needed and the Housing Bill, to be published in draft shortly, will provide for the compulsory licensing of Houses in Multiple Occupation and the selective licensing of landlords in areas of low demand. The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister is consulting on tenancy deposits and is encouraging voluntary measures such as local accreditation schemes as well as streamlining Housing Benefit to improve delivery and to give tenants greater choice. The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister continues to consider the scope for measures that could make long-term investment in private rented housing a more attractive proposition.

Islington Community Groups

Jeremy Corbyn: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what information he has collated on Government expenditure in the last 12 months on Islington community groups based in buildings the Borough Council is proposing to sell; and if he will make a statement. [89382]

13 Jan 2003 : Column 384W

Mr. McNulty: The information requested is not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

Jeremy Corbyn: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what consultation there has been with the Government Office for London by Islington Council on the proposed sale of buildings used by community organisations; and if he will make a statement. [89385]

Mr. McNulty: There has been no consultation with the Government Office on the proposed sale of buildings used by community organisations.

Local Government (Performance Assessment)

Mr. Gordon Prentice: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what assessment he has made of the Audit Commission's comprehensive performance assessment of single tier and county councils; and what assessment he has made of the reasons underlying the proportion of unitary authorities rated as excellent. [90694]

Mr. Raynsford: The assessments were a matter for the Audit Commission. The methodology was widely consulted on with local government, the Local Government Association and other stakeholders. The judgments made for individual authorities drew a great deal of information from varied sources to form an overall view of authorities' services and their capacity to improve. The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister considers the assessments provide a robust basis for our programme of improvement.

The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister has made no assessment of the reasons for differences in average scores in different types of authority. The advice of the Audit Commission is that there is no strong evidence of systematic differences between classes of authority and the key message is that it is possible for authorities of all types and with widely varying circumstances to be excellent.

Local Government Finance

Mr. Chope: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister if he will place in the Library the information used by his Department in deciding upon area cost adjustments in the provisional funding settlement for local Government in 2003–04. [90438]

Mr. Leslie: A full methodology guide to the area cost adjustment is available on the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister's website, and a copy has been placed in the Library of the House. The guide explains how data from the New Earnings Survey is used to calculate the adjustment, and which areas of the country receive it.

Local Government Finance

Mr. George Howarth: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what his estimate is for each shire and metropolitan county and for the GLA of spending per head from all local government sources in the last year for which figures are available. [90009]

13 Jan 2003 : Column 385W

Mr. Raynsford: The budgeted spending per head for each shire county area, metropolitan county area and the GLA in the year 2002–03 is in the following table:

Revenue expenditure per head for each shire county area, metropolitan county area and the GLA area for 2002–03

Former county area(6)Revenue expenditure (# per head)
Avon1,211
Bedfordshire1,257
Berkshire1,020
Buckinghamshire998
Cambridgeshire1,089
Cheshire1,171
Cleveland1,479
Cornwall1,049
Cumbria1,241
Derbyshire1,183
Devon1,237
Dorset1,089
Durham1,278
East Sussex1,376
Essex1,182
Gloucestershire1,130
Hampshire1,153
Hereford and Worcester953
Hertfordshire1,184
Humberside1,313
Isle of Wight1,152
Kent1,259
Lancashire1,278
Leicestershire1,172
Lincolnshire1,132
Norfolk1,144
Northamptonshire1,132
Northumberland1,149
North Yorkshire1,123
Nottinghamshire1,243
Oxfordshire1,003
Shropshire1,012
Somerset990
Staffordshire1,131
Suffolk1,124
Surrey1,073
Warwickshire1,119
West Sussex986
Wiltshire1,085
Greater London1,797
Greater Manchester1,458
Merseyside1,613
South Yorkshire1,370
Tyne and Wear1,510
West Midlands1,476
West Yorkshire1,319

(6) Shire county areas are based on pre-reorganisation boundaries (1995–96 to 1998–99) and include shire districts, unitary authorities, police and fire authorities. Metropolitan areas include metropolitan districts, police, fire, transport and waste authorities. The Greater London area includes London boroughs, City of London, GLA, waste authorities and the Greater London Magistrates Courts Authority.

Source:

2002–03 GFRA budget estimates and the mid- 2001 population estimates from the Office for National Statistics (ONS).


Mr. George Howarth: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what his latest estimate is of spending per head from all local government sources for each region in England in the last year for which figures are available. [90037]

Mr. Raynsford: The budgeted spending per head for each region in England in the year 2002–03 is in the following table.

13 Jan 2003 : Column 386W

Revenue expenditure per head in English regions for 2002–03

Government officeRevenue expenditure (# per head)
East Midlands1,181
East of England1,165
London1,797
North East1,405
North West1,394
South East1,164
South West1,136
West Midlands1,292
Yorkshire and the Number1,301

Source:

2002–03 GFRA budget estimates and the mld-2001 population estimates from the Office for National Statistics (ONS)



Next Section Index Home Page