Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
22 Jan 2003 : Column 336Wcontinued
Mr. Drew: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (1) what calculation she has made of the costs of the EU directive on disposal of dead stock for (a) the Government and (b) farmers; [92075]
(3) if she will make a statement on the Government's policy towards the forthcoming EU Directive on disposal of dead stock. [92074]
Mr. Morley [holding answer 20 January 2003]: Since April 2002, we have been involved in discussions with livestock and disposal industry stakeholders over future arrangements and funding options for disposal of fallen stock. The farming unions and the Master of the Foxhounds Association have been involved in these discussions.
I met with representatives from the farming unions and the knacker and rendering industry on 3 December 2002 to discuss a joint proposal for a National Fallen
22 Jan 2003 : Column 337W
Stock disposal scheme. The Government are prepared to make available the funding which it currently puts annually into collection and disposal of stock for the purposes of TSE testing into a National Scheme (nearly £30 million). However the industry must be responsible for additional funding and running of the Scheme (estimated to be around £20 million).
The livestock industry must now consider whether it wants to proceed with a National Scheme on this basis.
The Government expects farmers to comply with the new EU Directive. Those that do not can expect to be prosecuted.
Mr. Liddell-Grainger: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many deer were shot by the Forestry Commission in Somerset in (a) 200001 and (b) 200102. [91172]
Mr. Morley: The subject of the question relates to matters undertaken by Forest Enterprise. I asked its Chief Executive, Dr. Bob Mclntosh, to arrange a written response which I have attached.
Letter from Dr. Bob McIntosh to Mr. Liddell-Grainger, dated January 2003:
Mr. Liddell-Grainger: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs who is responsible for calculating the deer figures in the UK; and what they were at the most recent date. [91173]
Mr. Morley: No statutory body routinely collects information on overall wild deer numbers in England and Wales, or in Northern Ireland. The Deer Commission for Scotland conducts wild deer censuses in different areas every year and has estimated that wild deer in Scotland might currently number 600,000, although no completely reliable figure is available.
Stephen Harris et al. (1995) estimated the following pre-breeding population sizes for deer in Great Britain.
England | Scotland | Wales | Total GB | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Red deer | 12,500 | 347,000 | <50 | 360,000 |
Fallow deer | 95,000 | <4,000 | <1,000 | 100,000 |
Roe deer | 150,000 | 350,000 | 50 | 500,000 |
Sika deer | 2,500 | 9,000 | 0 | 11,500 |
Muntjac deer | 40,000 | <50 | <250 | 40,000 |
Chinese water deer | 650 | 0 | 0 | 650 |
Source:
From: Harris, S., Morris P., Wray S. and Yalden D. 1995. "A Review of British Mammals: population estimates and conservation status of British mammals other than cetaceans". JNCC, Peterborough.
Mr. Lidington: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs which (a) local
22 Jan 2003 : Column 338W
authorities and (b) drainage boards have still to produce a publicly available policy statement setting out plans for delivering the Government's policy aims and objectives for flood and coastal defence. [89641]
Margaret Beckett: When information on policy statements received was last compared with the Environment Agency in September 2002, statements had yet to be received from the following bodies:
Adlingfleet and Whitgift DC
Althorpe DB
Crowle Area IDB
Gravesend Bridge to Sheerness and Penshurst C of S
Lombards Wall to Gravesend
Bridge C of S
Rawcliffe DB
Scotter IDB
South Axholme IDB
Thorntree IDB (completion expected by December 2002)
Tickhill DB
West Axholme
West Butterwick
Woodwalton DC
Local Authorities (117)
Ashfield District Council
Aylesbury Vale District Council
Babergh District Council
Barking and Dagenham London
Borough Council
Barnet London Borough Council
Basildon District Council
Basingstoke and Deane
Borough Council
Blaby District Council
Boston Borough Council
Bracknell Forest Borough Council
Bradford City Council
Breckland Council
Brent London Borough Council
Brentwood Borough Council
Bridgnorth District Council
Brighton and Hove Council
Broadland District Council
Bromsgrove District Council
Broxbourne Borough Council
Cambridge City Council
Carrick District Council
Castle Point Borough Council
Chelmsford Borough Council
Chester-le-Street District Council
Chiltern District Council
City of London
Corby Borough Council
Craven District Council
Crawley Borough Council
Croydon London Borough Council
Dacorum Borough Council
Dartford Borough Council
Derbyshire Dales District Council
Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council
22 Jan 2003 : Column 339W
Ealing London Borough Council
East Cambridgeshire District Council
East Hertfordshire District Council
East Lindsey District Council
Fenland District Council
Forest Heath District Council
Forest of Dean District Council
Greenwich London Borough Council
Guildford Borough Council
Hackney London Borough Council
Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council
Harborough District Council
Haringey London Borough Council
Harlow District Council
Havering London Borough Council
High Peak Borough Council
Hinckley & Bosworth Borough Council
Horsham District Council
Isles of Scilly Council
Kensington and Chelsea Royal Borough
Kettering Borough Council
King's Lynn & West Norfolk
Borough Council
Kingston upon Thames Royal Borough
Lewisham London Borough Council
Lincoln City Council
Maidstone Borough Council
Maldon District Council
Malvern Hills District Council
Mendip District Council
Merton London Borough Council
Mid Devon District Council
Milton Keynes Council
Newham London Borough Council
North Hertfordshire District Council
North Kesteven District Council
North West Leicestershire District Council
North Wiltshire District Council
Norwich City Council
Nottingham City Council
Oadby and Wigston Borough Council
Oxford City Council
Penwith District Council
Plymouth City Council
Reading Borough Council
Redbridge London Borough Council
Richmond upon Thames London
Borough Council
Rochford District Council
Rushmoor Borough Council
Salisbury District Council
Sedgefield Borough Council
Sedgemoor District Council
Selby District Council
Slough Borough Council
South Bucks District Council
South Derbyshire District Council
South Hams District Council
South Holland District Council
South Kesteven District Council
22 Jan 2003 : Column 340W
South Norfolk District Council
South Oxfordshire District Council
South Somerset District Council
Southend-on-Sea Borough Council
Spelthorne Borough Council
St. Albans District Council
Staffordshire Moorlands District Council
Stevenage Borough Council
Teesdale District Council
Three Rivers District Council
Thurrock Borough Council
Tower Hamlets London Borough Council
Tunbridge Wells Borough Council
Uttlesford District Council
Wakefield City Council
Waltham Forest London Borough Council
Wandsworth London Borough Council
Watford Borough Council
West Berkshire Council
West Lindsey District Council
West Somerset District Council
West Wiltshire District Council
Westminster City Council
Weymouth & Portland Borough Council
Windsor & Maidenhead Royal Borough
Wokingham Council
Wyre Forest District Council
Mr. Sayeed: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs which local authorities adopted measures to improve the thermal insulation of buildings under their Home Energy Conservation Act obligations in fewer than 0.25 per cent. of their buildings over the last year. [90805]
Mr. Morley: The Home Energy Conservation Act does not require Energy Conservation Authorities to report on specific energy efficiency measures or the numbers of buildings in which measures have been installed. They are required to report on the overall progress they have made in implementing measures they have identified as being practicable, cost-effective and likely to result in significant improvement in the energy efficiency of the residential accommodation in their area.
Next Section | Index | Home Page |