|Previous Section||Index||Home Page|
7 Feb 2003 : Column 482Wcontinued
Alun Michael: The cost of external consultants in 2002 was £39 million. This figure includes costs for core-Defra, the Rural Payments Agency, the pesticides Safety Directorate, the Veterinary Medicines Directorate, the Central Science Laboratory, the Veterinary Laboratory Agency and the Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science.
7 Feb 2003 : Column 483W
Alun Michael: The timetable will depend on whether or not the Secretary of State calls a public inquiry into the designation order submitted by the Countryside Agency. This will be determined when all objections and representations received have been considered after the period for public consultation on the order ends on 28 February. If, as is anticipated, an inquiry is required, then it will probably be 2006 when the Secretary of State is able to decide whether or not to confirm the designation order. A full National Park authority, if it were decided to establish one, would probably come into being the following year. If there were no public inquiry, the decision on the designation order could be made this year.
Mr. Maude: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what assessment she has made of the right of access available to areas for which an entrance fee has been payable, but which meet the criteria for open country under the provisions of the Countryside Rights of Way Act 2000; and if she will make a statement. 
Alun Michael: The Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000 provides a power for landowners and tenants to close land for any reason for up to 28 days each year. The Act also makes provision for any person with an interest in land to apply to their relevant authority (the Countryside Agency, or, in national parks, the National Park Authority) to restrict or exclude access on the grounds of land management, public safety or to avoid the risk of fire. It would be open to landowners who before the Act charged a fee for entrance to their land to apply to their relevant authority for a restriction or exclusion of access to enable them to continue to charge for entry to that land but would have to show that one of the three criteria is met.
On our behalf, the Countryside Agency is developing guidance for relevant authorities on the operation of the restrictions and exclusions system. It is considering what guidance to give relevant authorities on applications for restrictions and exclusions of access for the purpose of charging a fee for entry to the land.
Norman Baker: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how much has been spent on providing security for shipments of radioactive material by BNFL in the last year for which figures are available. 
Mr. Wilson: The costs involved in transporting radioactive material, including the costs of ensuring that appropriate levels of physical protection are applied to the material during transport, are a commercial matter for the companies involved. Where radioactive material transport is carried out by BNFL pursuant to contracts concluded with external customers, the transport costs are reflected in the value of the contract.
7 Feb 2003 : Column 484W
Norman Baker: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what controls she intends to put in place to prevent BNFL from using funds available to it for investments tangential to its primary function. 
Mr. Drew: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what factors she estimates were responsible for the increases in severe fuel poverty between 1996 and 1998 as demonstrated in Table 13 of "Fuel Poverty in England in 1998". 
Mr. Wilson: The number of fuel poor households in England is estimated to have fallen by one million between 1996 and 1998, from 4.3 million in 1996 to 3.3 million in 1998. Most of this reduction is thought to be due to changes in energy prices and incomes.
It is recognised that for those in severe fuel poverty improvements in energy efficiency will be needed to remove these households from fuel poverty. Improvements, and increased funding, for the key programmes to improve energy efficiency were put in place after 1998.
The figures for 1998 were based on a relatively small sample, and data for 2001 based on a larger sample from the 2001 English House Condition Survey will become available shortly, and will be published on the internet at www.dti.gov.uk/consumers/fuel poverty/index.shtml
Ms Hewitt: A steering group will direct the practical implementation of the conclusions of the Review of the Regulatory Regime of the Accountancy Profession. It is a short term, working arrangement on which those currently heading the major regulatory bodies affected by review have agreed to serve.
The Government are keen to promote meritocracy and diversity among those charged with delivering independent regulation of the accountancy and audit professions. I have accepted the recommendations of the review that there should be open advertisement of all board positions in the new structure of the Financial Reporting Council, which will incorporate the responsibilities of the current Accountancy Foundation.
7 Feb 2003 : Column 485W
Mr. Laws: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what her estimate is of her Department's spending on assistance to the coal industry in each year from 199091 to 200304 (planned). 
Mr. Wilson: The following table shows Government financial support for the coal industry from 199091 to 200203. These figures exclude the impact of debt write-offs and proceeds at the privatisation of British Coal and payments made in respect of inherited liabilities following that privatisation, such as health claims.
A budget for spending on assistance to the coal industry for 200304 has not been finalised. Given that final decisions have yet to be made on a number of potential measures, each of which could significantly affect the size of the budget, it would be unrealistic at present to give a firm estimate on projected spending for 200304.
|Financial Year||Total grants|
(2) This is an estimated figure. Part of the expenditure forecast for financial year 200203 may slip into 200304.
Mr. Laws: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (1) what her estimate is of her Department's actual spending and planned spending on the 50 Best Companies to Work For list; and if she will make a statement; 
Alan Johnson: The UK Government are committed to making the UK the best place to do business and to raising UK productivity and prosperity for all. This can only be achieved by recognising every aspect responsible for performance including work organisation and human resource management.
The Department has therefore been happy to be associated with and support the Best Companies To Work For Project with the Sunday Times. In 2001 this produced a 50 Best UK Companies to Work for List. In 2002 due to the rise in popularity this was expanded to the Top 100 UK Companies to Work For. Since the project started, in 1999, we have spent in the region of
7 Feb 2003 : Column 486W
£500,000, which includes £100,000 committed for the 2003 Top UK Companies to Work for List. The surveys involved have been substantial and the generation of the 2003 list has included surveying over 47,000 employees. The project plans to announce the 2003 winners at the end of this month. We are also planning to spend some money on dissemination of the results of the survey but the sums involved are subject to further consideration.
The Top 100 UK Companies to Work For is just one part of the Work-Life Balance Campaign. The campaign was launched by the Prime Minister in 2000 to persuade employers to introduce ways of working which meet the needs of business and customers while simultaneously improving the work-life balance of their employees.
200102: £4.4 million
200304: £4.4 million
Support for over 400 private, voluntary and public sector organisations through the Challenge Fund;
A very well used website providing information, guidance and case studies. The site received an average of 6,000 'hits' a day over the last eight months and much positive feedback from users;
Completion of a highly successful international study tour in 2002 which culminated in the extremely well attended and received 'Improving Life at Work Conference' which I was delighted to open in January this year.
Mr. Laws: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what her estimate is of her Department's expenditure on the automotive industry in each year from 199091 to 200405 (planned), if she will give a breakdown down for each year to show the origin of investments and grant-aid of over £1 million per year; and if she will make a statement. 
Alan Johnson: Since 1990, total commitments of grant aid to the automotive industry in the form of Regional Selective Assistance have totalled some £330 million. A table detailing the totals, broken down by year, is attached.
The Department has also committed grants totalling £9.9 million to SMMT Industry Forum since 1996, and around £7.3 million to Foresight Vehicle since 1997. £45 million has been committed to future funding of the Automotive Innovation and Growth Team report initiatives.
7 Feb 2003 : Column 487W
|Less than £1 million||Greater or equal to £1 million|
|Year||Number||Value of offers (£000)||Number||Value ofoffers (£000)|
Mr. Laws: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what her estimate is of her Department's spending on aerospace and defence grants and launch investment in each year from 199596 to 200405 (planned); and if she will make a statement. 
Alan Johnson: The Government continue to be supportive of the aerospace industry in the UK. The Department's principle support to the civil aerospace sector is provided through the Aeronautics Research Programme (formerly known as CARAD) and through repayable launch investment. Expenditure on research and development to meet the UK's defence needs is a matter for the Ministry of Defence.
For civil aeronautics research, the value of grants paid from April 1995 through to March 2002 totalled over £145 million, averaging over £20 million per year. Forecast expenditure for the period April 2002 to March 2005 is also expected to exceed £20 million annually. Since April 1995 we have also committed in the order of £1 billion in launch investment for major new aircraft and engine projects. Annual expenditure under these programmes can be found in the Department's annual Expenditure Plans report which is available on the DTI's website at http://www.dti.gov.uk/expenditureplan/ or from the House of Commons Library.
The IGT will draw on the expertise of the major aerospace stakeholders to identify the key issues, including support to the sector, which will shape the future of the industry. The IGT will make recommendations to the Prime Minister in spring 2003 as to how the UK can best respond to the competitive challenges it will face over the next 20 years. However, an interim report from the IGT is hosted on the SBAC's website at http://www.sbac.co.uk/newsview.asp Copies of the report will be placed in the House of Commons Library in due course.
7 Feb 2003 : Column 488W
Mr. Laws: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what her estimate is of her Department's spending on the nuclear fusion programme in each year from 200102 to 200405 (planned). 
Mr. Wilson: The Department of Trade and Industry's funding for fusion for the period 200102 was £14.63 million. From April 2003 onwards the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council will have responsibility for funding fusion, their spending from 2003 to 2005 is expected to be in the region of £15 million-£17 million per annum.
|Next Section||Index||Home Page|